return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Archives > Classic old threads / Inactive Forums > Retired Forums > Sports Discussion

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 
Official 2006-2007 NBA Season Thread (pg. 83)
View this Thread in Original format
LeopoldStotch
quote:
Originally posted by inconspicuous
I know...that was the basis of the joke :/

hey at least we can still make some Rob Nen jokes. Same city, different sport and different guy. both died. :toothless
inconspicuous
I like Rob Nen :(

Is Mark Wohlers dead yet?
verndogs
quote:
Originally posted by LeopoldStotch
hey hey ... no one bashes the champs around here. 4 rings in 9 years..... dynasty!!!!!!!!!!


i know that pisses off vern when i call the spurs a dynasty. :wtf:



it's because they're clearly NOT a dynasty



yet
verndogs
quote:
Originally posted by LeopoldStotch
hey at least we can still make some Rob Nen jokes. Same city, different sport and different guy. both died. :toothless


it's rod beck
Member of X
quote:
Originally posted by verndogs
it's because they're clearly NOT a dynasty



yet


Yeah, in thinking about it I don't consider them to be a dynasty. The championships were way too spead out. That doesn't equal dynasty. Sorry it just doesn't. They aren't even repeat champions or made the finals the previous year. That term is thrown around too much.

Pats...3 super bowls in 4 years? I think that isn't the classic definition of 4 championships but football is harder to repeat in all of sports. Has any team won more than 2 in a row? No. So 3 out of 4 should be the gauge. Therefore, I'd give the Cowgirls and the Pansies as the only ones. Begrudgingly..... yuck

Yankees 1996-2001, that's a dynasty!! Especially being the best team ever assembled (1998).
King Ecnal
quote:
Originally posted by Member of X
Yeah, in thinking about it I don't consider them to be a dynasty. The championships were way too spead out. That doesn't equal dynasty. Sorry it just doesn't. They aren't even repeat champions or made the finals the previous year. That term is thrown around too much.

Pats...3 super bowls in 4 years? I think that isn't the classic definition of 4 championships but football is harder to repeat in all of sports. Has any team won more than 2 in a row? No. So 3 out of 4 should be the gauge. Therefore, I'd give the Cowgirls and the Pansies as the only ones. Begrudgingly..... yuck

Yankees 1996-2001, that's a dynasty!! Especially being the best team ever assembled (1998).


plus, its San Antonio... they got................ONE professional team.... ONE.... thats not a sports city/town/region.... Dynasty also depends on where it is... unless the......Carolina Panthers go out and win 4 super bowls in a row, then well, i'm full of ...

but what I'm saying, if the Bulls or Lakers did what the Spurs have done, it'd probably be more of a dynasty than the boring-ass spurzzzz....
inconspicuous
quote:
Originally posted by King Ecnal
plus, its San Antonio... they got................ONE professional team.... ONE.... thats not a sports city/town/region.... Dynasty also depends on where it is


classic NE elitist bull. :o


they're not a dynasty because they've never completely dominated every other team for a stretch of years. Dynasty status has nothing to do with location.
King Ecnal
quote:
Originally posted by inconspicuous
classic NE elitist bull. :o


lol, and I wasn't even going for that... I didn't mention the Celtics on purpose, and I still come off as Elitist???

, GO ME!!!
Kapedan
Actually, I agree. They are not a dynasty yet. If they can win it this upcoming year, I think they will be. Still, the Lakers won three straight, whereas we have never won two in a row. Kind of sad. We were close though. :)
Member of X
quote:
Originally posted by King Ecnal
lol, and I wasn't even going for that... I didn't mention the Celtics on purpose, and I still come off as Elitist???

, GO ME!!!


Mentioning the Celtics obviously wouldn't be elitist since they've sucked for countless years.

King Ecnal
quote:
Originally posted by Member of X
Mentioning the Celtics obviously wouldn't be elitist since they've sucked for countless years.


it was an EXAMPLE... ass
chorche
Well, who do you think will be early favourite for the next season? I suppose, that Mavs will be no afraid of rising Warriors and finally win! ;)
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 
Privacy Statement