return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 
lol @ christianity (pg. 7)
View this Thread in Original format
Floorfiller
quote:
Originally posted by Clovis86
Either way, thats alot o' tight p00n.


:stongue: :stongue: :stongue:
djmetatron
quote:
Originally posted by Orbax
No...youre not paying attention. Theres a difference between proving something and having ANY BASIS for the thought. If youre making it up, say "here is my fairy tale" dont pass it off as something when it isnt.


:conf: i can see i'm getting on your nerves here so i'll leave it alone.

but if your asking for a source here are a couple good books on the subject:

http://human-nature.com/nibbs/02/boyer.html

http://www.godpart.com/
lex400sc
quote:
Originally posted by Clovis86
Either way, thats alot o' tight p00n.


virgin screws suck anyway, gimme 7 whores ftw :wtf:
djmetatron
quote:
Originally posted by Floorfiller
religious oppinion: "god exists because i read about it"


non-religious oppinion: "god doesn't exist because i read about it"



but what books are each of these people reading?

..and were they translated properly?

:p
Orbax
quote:
Originally posted by djmetatron
:conf: i can see i'm getting on your nerves here so i'll leave it alone.


?

quote:
but if your asking for a source here are a couple good books on the subject:

http://human-nature.com/nibbs/02/boyer.html

http://www.godpart.com/


Ill look at these. In the meantime you might want to explain how these go towards your personal enlightment further than reading about them.

edit: so those are book titles. Have you even read them?
lex400sc
quote:
Originally posted by Floorfiller
religious oppinion: "god exists because i read about it"


non-religious oppinion: "god doesn't exist because i read about it"


hmmmmmmmmmmm.....


that's where i differ. i based my thoughts on what i know, not how many sources and links i can attach to them... as my original post points out, there's plenty of bull publications out there to point to, all of which amount to nothing.
Floorfiller
quote:
Originally posted by djmetatron
but what books are each of these people reading?

..and were they translated properly?

:p



if translation is to blame then what is to be said of reading someone else's rationalization of material from a translated work?


quote:
Originally posted by lex400sc
that's where i differ. i based my thoughts on what i know, not how many sources and links i can attach to them... as my original post points out, there's plenty of bull publications everyone can point to



a religious person might use that same argument...they base their faith on what they know (spiritually) not on how many sources and links they can attach to them...and acutally would be more justified since by definition the non-religious argument usually is based on the belief that it is more factual...
lex400sc
quote:
Originally posted by Floorfiller a religious person might use that same argument...they base their faith on what they know (spiritually) not on how many sources and links they can attach to them...


what i know is based on a lot of formal education... human psychology, sociology, philosophy, history, etc... not weekly sermons on how to live life...
Orbax
quote:
Originally posted by lex400sc
that's where i differ. i based my thoughts on what i know, not how many sources and links i can attach to them... as my original post points out, there's plenty of bull publications out there to point to, all of which amount to nothing.


thats very Gnostic of you, but its been thoroughly reamed as a valid philosophy
Orbax
quote:
Originally posted by lex400sc
what i know is based on a lot of formal education... human psychology, sociology, philosophy, history, etc... not weekly sermons on how to live life...


So all religion, including the ones you were referencing earlier, were promulgated through weekly services? You lose at logic.

Floorfiller
quote:
Originally posted by lex400sc
what i know is based on a lot of formal education... human psychology, sociology, philosophy, history, etc... not weekly sermons on how to live life...



and what if someone recieves a formal education in theology?


you're comparing different levels of education.
lex400sc
quote:
Originally posted by Floorfiller a religious person might use that same argument...they base their faith on what they know (spiritually) not on how many sources and links they can attach to them...and acutally would be more justified since by definition the non-religious argument usually is based on the belief that it is more factual...


that's because the non-religious community bases it's pool on knowledge upon logic, mathematics, scientific process and emperical evidence... NOT a thousand year old book of folk stories that is just ASSUMED to be accurate.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 
Privacy Statement