|
My evolution theory involving fa...*ahem* i mean homosexuality (pg. 27)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by emc^2
|
considering you believe yourself to be such an open minded and accepting person, why do you keep 'censoring' the word homosexual as though it was a degrading term? |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by CharetCutestroy
Did you read the rest of my post? I agree about the fact that the sexual gratification can become it's own reason but then why would homosexual gratification be needed when there is already heterosexual gratification in place? |
because it is a different kind of gratification.
kinda like asking why do you need vanilla when you have apples. |
|
|
| Steven Hays |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ang ' ela_ie
I dont think it needs to be closed.
I DO think it needs to have the title changed so that it in no way references terminology that I rank as low as the words n***** and s***, etc.
I think that people who dont have enough respect for the other members of a forum not to degrade them with such words shouldnt be able to discuss in the forum. |
I think living in a time of "offended people" is stupid. You are who you are so why would you be offended if someone told you other words? If someone called me a cracker I wouldn't be offended. If someone told me something I don't want to hear, it goes in one ear and out the other. Seriously, I'm so tired of this polital correctness bull. One person gets offended and laws/rules have to change because of it. (EX: school pledge, no more Christmas). God people get a life. People have always had opinions, but the great thing about life is that we don't have to listen to them. |
|
|
| CharetCutestroy |
| quote: | Originally posted by Psy-T
because it is a different kind of gratification.
kinda like asking why do you need vanilla when you have apples. |
hmm. but then why would said "apples" suddenly become desirable is my question. i would view it more as switching from the apple to the bark. why would someone no longer want the apple which has obvious benenfits and start desiring the bark which has no benefits (except maybe the fiber :D)
Not saying that the "bark" isn't desireable for some it's that why would it be? I know people don't think about procreation as a benefit of sex, they just like the sex.:) So then you must look at sex as a tool to obtain something else. And since the homosexual form of sex provides no other or extra benefit then you have to ask why does it exist? |
|
|
| Psy-T |
| quote: | Originally posted by CharetCutestroy
Not saying that the "bark" isn't desireable for some it's that why would it be? I know people don't think about procreation as a benefit of sex, they just like the sex.:) So then you must look at sex as a tool to obtain something else. And since the homosexual form of sex provides no other or extra benefit then you have to ask why does it exist? |
you probably didn't notice, but you answered your own question in that same paragraph. |
|
|
| XoxidE |
| THis is what i dont get about homosexuals, girls have poopers too, why not stick it in there, why they got to stick it in guys? |
|
|
| kr00t0n |
| quote: | Originally posted by XoxidE
THis is what i dont get about homosexuals, girls have poopers too, why not stick it in there, why they got to stick it in guys? |
:rolleyes:
because they are attracted to the male form, duh! |
|
|
| XoxidE |
| How about if they stick it in body building women? |
|
|
| CharetCutestroy |
| quote: | Originally posted by Psy-T
you probably didn't notice, but you answered your own question in that same paragraph. |
i knew i didn't quite get my point across there.
what i mean is yes some guys like it in the p00per from another hairy guy. and some girls like eating oysters.
but why? in the bigger picture why would nature cause some to have these sexual wants? we know why the original sexual desires exist; to cause procreation. why would we need something else?
i don't really think there is an answer to this. |
|
|
| XoxidE |
This is my theory, In their past life, they were the opposite sex they are now, and when they died, and then reborn again, they changed sex, but their "soul" stayed the same...I dont think i said it right...
Hmmm...
Ok simpler:
Past life, girl who is attracted to guys
*dead*
born, girl turned to guy, still attracted to guys....
ah, nvm.:crazy: |
|
|
| kr00t0n |
| quote: | Originally posted by CharetCutestroy
i knew i didn't quite get my point across there.
what i mean is yes some guys like it in the p00per from another hairy guy. and some girls like eating oysters.
but why? in the bigger picture why would nature cause some to have these sexual wants? we know why the original sexual desires exist; to cause procreation. why would we need something else?
i don't really think there is an answer to this. |
erm, humans want many things we don't need, we've evolved beyond basic survival necessities
some people like horror movies, others comedies, some like rock, some like trance, only fair that some guys could like wouldn't you say? |
|
|
| tribu |
| I can't believe this thread is still going. I think it's a waste of time to try to rationalize human behaviors or condemn them for that matter. Good discussion though, I suppose |
|
|
|
|
