|
My evolution theory involving fa...*ahem* i mean homosexuality (pg. 7)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Vlad |
| quote: | Originally posted by Steven Hays
Yes! To an extent... |
Depends on the environment you put them in. |
|
|
| tribu |
| Im big on nurture (enviorment, development) over nature as well. I believe alot of what we are physically comes from genetics, but our sexual actions are learned and aped, you might say, from a multitude of inputs |
|
|
| Radagast |
Here's my evolutionary chart involving general faggotry (In human males)...
Straight > Metrosexual > Hermaphrodude > Gay > Sex change |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| Freud believed we are all bisexual. |
|
|
| Vlad |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
Freud believed we are all bisexual. |
Freud was a sick bastad. |
|
|
| Ang ' ela_ie |
| I think this subject line is offensive, and I think it shines a bad light on TA. I want to vomit every time I read it. |
|
|
| Dervish |
| quote: | Originally posted by Slylee
i definitely believe in evolution...i'm not buying the whole Adam & Eve thing.
|
| quote: | | Originally posted by Slylee whoever or WHATever created us, didn't create us so that men should other men in the . |
How does that work? Either you belive in evolution which would mean noting created us, or something created us with a no entry . |
|
|
| Dervish |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
Freud believed we are all bisexual. |
See I recon in a totally open socity we would be. But I'm personally preconditioned to just be repulsed by the idea of a in one of my holes. |
|
|
| ::TranceVanDyk:: |
| quote: | Originally posted by Slylee
i don't know much about evolution aside from the basics, and i'm not really "religious" even though i was brought up catholic. i'm one of those "sprituals" who just believes in some sort of God or higher power and that our souls go somewhere nice hopefully when we die, but if not, then oh well, i'll be dead and it won't matter.
anyway, i was thinking about the whole gay epidemic (sorry for calling it an epidemic like it's some sort of disease but i can't think of another word) and it's really surprising actually. i really think that there is a gay gene and i'm wondering if there is just a "glitch" if you will in our whole genetic make up, the more and more we reproduce.
i definitely believe in evolution...i'm not buying the whole Adam & Eve thing.
but anyway...when it comes to homosexuality, i think it's wrong. and i don't mean because of my religious or spiritual beliefs. i'm talking about the basic science of it all. whoever or WHATever created us, didn't create us so that men should other men in the . it is very obvious what our was made to do, and that is to . if men were created to men, then don't u think men would be able to bare children?
anyway so i think it has to do with some sort of weird glitch along the way where men are starting to like men (more and more i mean), and i wonder if eventually men will be able to have babies after we have evolved more.
what u think? i'm nuts?
sorry for being so crude but i'm sure u guys wouldn't expect anything less:p |
u live in the san francisco of the east coast, u cant escape them.
but if you're saying that it is not natural to be homosexual, ide agree with you. and if u believe in evolution, natural selection would eventually have all the gays die off, but not the case, as the heteros reproduce at very alarming rates, humans are not going extinct after all!! |
|
|
| Vlad |
| quote: | Originally posted by Dervish
How does that work? Either you belive in evolution which would mean noting created us, or something created us with a no entry . |
Now youre just nit picking at her wording. We has to start somewhere, as a single celled organism - and through evolution, body parts began to emerge during evolution to adapt to certain environments. Giraffe's dont have long necks just by chance. |
|
|
| ::TranceVanDyk:: |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vlad
Scientists have done genetic studies and they believe that there is a genetic link to homosexuality, although its just a theory after many experiments, and there isnt any conclusive evidence. They are constantly working on different fragments of chromosomes and they believe that they have found the area, but arent 100% sure. |
scientists have already come to the conclusion that a homosexual's DNA and that of heterosexuals are no different. there is no gay gene. a lot of time, one is gay because of something they've seen, how they've been raised or abuse of some kind. they were not born gay. |
|
|
| Vlad |
| quote: | Originally posted by ::TranceVanDyk::
u live in the san francisco of the east coast, u cant escape them.
but if you're saying that it is not natural to be homosexual, ide agree with you. and if u believe in evolution, natural selection would eventually have all the gays die off, but not the case, as the heteros reproduce at very alarming rates, humans are not going extinct after all!! |
You probably didnt read the entire thread... gay's cant die off because women carry the gene for homosexuality, if that is the case. |
|
|
|
|
