|
Sarah Palin (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| R!CH |
| quote: | Originally posted by T.A.S.D.
Ha ha Ha R!ch. You shamelessly continue to misstep by clearly demonstrating your hypocrisy (typical of leftards). Can I find your info on this thread on the covers of the SDUT? I bet not. Yet you still cannot refute me with regard to Biden's stances on EDM (EDM being the reason we visit this site). And you still won't state why you support him when he stands for very little, except largely against EDM. However, you're the one obsessively surrendering to recognizing me because you hysterically proceed with your insecure revengeful and feebly inadequate attempts to slur me after each of my blessed, unassailable posts of facts. |
rofl that was hilarious! especially the very end :haha: :haha:
thanks for that :stongue: |
|
|
| CND |
| quote: | Originally posted by R!CH
what the ? do you know what a moral crusader is? it's someone who takes their own morals and insists upon projecting them upon all of society through laws. "the word is bad, i'm going to have it banned from tv. evolution is wrong, i'm going to have it banned from libraries. gay marriage is a sin, i'm going to make sure it's illegal. weed is dangerous, no one should be allowed to touch it." i am the complete opposite of a moral crusader, what you would call a libertarian. themoreyouknow.jpg |
You are just as guilty of demagoguery as those whom you despise from the right?
Like Al Franken except not as funny or charming. |
|
|
| Clovis |
| quote: | Originally posted by T.A.S.D.
Wow. R!ch seems to have a hard-on for Sarah Palin! Let's take a closer look at her counterpart: Sen Joe Biden. He's an uber-leftarded-30+ year Washingtonian who's only famous for his RAVE act. With his sneaky legislation, he wanted to eliminate EDM altogether. That's right you Libtards, he wanted you in prison for paraphernalia (i.e. pacifiers and waterbottles) with or without MDMA on your person or in your system. Biden wanted to imprison promoters, even if they did the best they could in security and drug-free measures. |
Yeah thats definitely a negative.
So I think on that front we're something like:
Obama/Biden: 8
McCain/Palin: 286 |
|
|
| R!CH |
| quote: | Originally posted by CND
You are just as guilty of demagoguery as those whom you despise from the right?
Like Al Franken except not as funny or charming. |
how so? this is news to me considering i've never signed a petition or voted on any laws that sought to restrict the liberties upon which this nation was founded. moreover i've never used any false claims to arrive at any position of power as you've suggested, but i'm very curious to hear how you reached that conclusion... |
|
|
| pointer |
This is from Factcheck.org. FYI only because I noticed some things in this thread that weren't true about Palin (like the banning of books, etc.):
| quote: | We’ve been flooded for the past few days with queries about dubious Internet postings and mass e-mail messages making claims about McCain’s running mate, Gov. Palin. We find that many are completely false, or misleading.
Palin did not cut funding for special needs education in Alaska by 62 percent. She didn’t cut it at all. In fact, she tripled per-pupil funding over just three years.
She did not demand that books be banned from the Wasilla library. Some of the books on a widely circulated list were not even in print at the time. The librarian has said Palin asked a “What if?” question, but the librarian continued in her job through most of Palin’s first term.
She was never a member of the Alaskan Independence Party, a group that wants Alaskans to vote on whether they wish to secede from the United States. She’s been registered as a Republican since May 1982.
Palin never endorsed or supported Pat Buchanan for president. She once wore a Buchanan button as a “courtesy” when he visited Wasilla, but shortly afterward she was appointed to co-chair of the campaign of Steve Forbes in the state.
Palin has not pushed for teaching creationism in Alaska’s schools. She has said that students should be allowed to “debate both sides” of the evolution question, but she also said creationism “doesn’t have to be part of the curriculum. |
FYI only.
rob. |
|
|
| Electrophile |
| quote: | Originally posted by R!CH
how so? this is news to me considering i've never signed a petition or voted on any laws that sought to restrict the liberties upon which this nation was founded. moreover i've never used any false claims to arrive at any position of power as you've suggested, but i'm very curious to hear how you reached that conclusion... |
Ummm...he read your posts and was able to use his perfect brain that God gave him to build a complete psychological and political profile of you from nine replies to a thread! :haha: |
|
|
| CND |
| quote: | Originally posted by Electrophile
Ummm...he read your posts and was able to use his perfect brain that God gave him to build a complete psychological and political profile of you from nine replies to a thread! :haha: |
Wow you know me pretty well. Thanks for the insight into myself. Gotta sleep on that bit of wisdom. |
|
|
| R!CH |
| quote: | Originally posted by pointer
This is from Factcheck.org. FYI only because I noticed some things in this thread that weren't true about Palin (like the banning of books, etc.):
FYI only.
rob. |
ok this is yet another case of inferring too much from what i posted. i never said she banned books, i never said anything about a list. as a matter of fact that is news to me. i said she tried to. from cbs news:
| quote: | Time reported last week, for example, that Palin asked the Wasilla librarian, Mary Ellen Baker, about the process for banning books. Baker was reportedly "aghast" at the question. Soon after taking office, Palin, according to a New York Times report, fired Baker, and news reports from the time indicate that Palin thought Baker hadn't done enough to give her "full support" to the mayor.
Palin reversed course on Baker's dismissal after a local outcry, and later said the discussions about banning books were "rhetorical." |
|
|
|
| R!CH |
| quote: | Originally posted by CND
Wow you know me pretty well. Thanks for the insight into myself. Gotta sleep on that bit of wisdom. |
before you sleep on it, can you explain to me what it is i have in common with religious zealots and moral crusaders and how i am like a demagogue? |
|
|
| R!CH |
| i also need help finding where it is i stated i'm a supporter of joe biden's policies. tasd, little help? |
|
|
| blaze |
| quote: | Originally posted by revitalizedbeat
aah it reminds of a quote of Buddha:
Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.
Buddha |
so bottom line is we are OUT OF LUCK, regardless of the victor.:( :sadgreen: :sadgreen: :sadgreen: :sadgreen: |
|
|
| CND |
| quote: | Originally posted by R!CH
before you sleep on it, can you explain to me what it is i have in common with religious zealots and moral crusaders and how i am like a demagogue? |
Because you are a zealot and a crusader for your own views, morality and causes. No different from whom you hold in such contempt.
Nothing wrong with that as you are more than entitled to your views, just as they are. As a matter of fact I admire the passion . . . but leftist zealots are no different than right wing zealots.
I don't know you, never met you, but that’s the perception I get when reading your posts . . . that’s all.
Sweet dreams. |
|
|
|
|
