|
Intelligent Design Theory (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| FuzzQi |
| Did ID evolve from creationism. If so, self pwn. |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by FuzzQi
Did ID evolve from creationism. If so, self pwn. |
:stongue:
However, it can work both ways: ID had designers, so to speak :p |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| Im surprised we’ve gone so many replies without lira pulling out his tolerance for stupid faggot cap! |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
Im surprised we’ve gone so many replies without lira pulling out his tolerance for stupid faggot cap! |
Huh? ID is intolerable both because it's bad science and, for that matter, bad theology. What are you talking about? :conf: |
|
|
| FuzzQi |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
:stongue:
However, it can work both ways: ID had designers, so to speak :p |
Intelligent designers |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by FuzzQi
Intelligent designers |
"Ignorant designers" still spells ID :D |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Huh? ID is intolerable both because it's bad science and, for that matter, bad theology. What are you talking about? :conf: |
you were defending the creationist musuem, don't try and lie to me now! :gsmile: |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
you were defending the creationist musuem, don't try and lie to me now! :gsmile: |
I said if the American government reckons it's not a problem to sponsor/finance the construction of that park because of the economic benefits, then I'm not opposed to that. In fact, if those nutters all move to some unimportant place in Kentucky, it's all the better for the rest of us.
I never said I support their views, or even think they're remotely valid. If anything, they're the poster children of what happens when you give faith more credit than it deserves... and I'm not even sure it deserves any. |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by Saka
no, not going to argue in here.
point in me doing so? |
its what god would want you to do. Here's your chance |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
I said if the American government reckons it's not a problem to sponsor/finance the construction of that park because of the economical benefits, then I'm not opposed to that. In fact, if those nutters all move to some unimportant place in Kentucky, it's all the better for the rest of us. |
haha, i don't remember anything about "economic benefits"; i do remember some balls about possible future contributions to mankind by way of magic as yet undiscovered though :p
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
I never said I support their views, or even think they're remotely valid. If anything, they're the poster children of what happens when you give faith more credit than it deserves... and I'm not even sure it deserves any. |
that's the (unholy) spirit! |
|
|
| Lira |
Oh, I didn't notice the typo, thanks for pointing it out :)
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
haha, i don't remember anything about "economic benefits"; i do remember some balls about possible future contributions to mankind by way of magic as yet undiscovered though :p |
If I recall correctly, it's in my first posts defending the construction of the park, but because it wasn't the "outrageous" bit, it probably didn't draw much attention :p
No, I don't believe they're bound to make "any contributions to mankind by way of magic". What I said is that just because you disagree with someone, that alone is not a good reason to suppress their view because, if they're wrong they can show us why we're right, and if they're right we can learn something from them (and there's nothing new about this, John Stuart Mill said it 150 years ago). In this case, it's blatantly obvious that they're as misguided as they can be, and their lunacy can show us what went wrong and how we can avoid it. Needless to say, they're also keen to silence the opposition.
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
that's the (unholy) spirit! |
Learn one thing about me: Just because I tolerate the existence of an idea, that doesn't mean I agree with it ;)
Or think it's tolerable, for that matter, these folks really get on my ! |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Oh, I didn't notice the typo, thanks for pointing it out :) |
haha actually i wasn't pointing. i was quoting you minus what was obviously a typo. i think i've seen one time ever your english ever needed fixing!
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
If I recall correctly, it's in my first posts defending the construction of the park, but because it wasn't the "outrageous" bit, it probably didn't draw much attention :p |
yeah, that's a fair call. especially if we're talking about me. in my defence though, for a portuguese naturale you type quite a lot of english to read :p
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
No, I don't believe they're bound to make "any contributions to mankind by way of magic". What I said is that just because you disagree with someone, that alone is not a good reason to suppress their view because, if they're wrong they can show us why we're right, and if they're right we can learn something from them (and there's nothing new about this, John Stuart Mill said it 150 years ago). In this case, it's blatantly obvious that they're as misguided as they can be, and their lunacy can show us what went wrong and how we can avoid it. Needless to say, they're also keen to silence the opposition. |
is this a long long paragraph with dead whitey referenced somewhere? goddamn it :mad:
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Learn one thing about me: Just because I tolerate the existence of an idea, that doesn't mean I agree with it ;) |
well duh. i know you don't agree with it. im being intolerant of your tolerance for it! :tongue2 |
|
|
|
|
