1) .02 seconds LOL
2) marty's reaction
3) what is the devils record vs the rangers in the playoffs
4) sit.
1) Stop using your past 2 years' record against the Devils as a benchmark for success, it means nothing. "The CUP means everything."
2) Get your goalie a Stanley Cup ring, or at least help him beat some records, before you call him "King"
3) Win another cup, so you can make it TWICE in 50+ years.
4) Tell all your Rag buddies to come out of hiding when you guys don't have a good season. I couldn't find anyone to ridicule the past 10 years. Now, everyone's a "Ranger fan" and took their jerseys out of storage...
DJ Eco
quote:
Originally posted by sean5
funny how the team is able to beat the devils on a fairly consistent basis
Can I say it again? WIN A CUP, PLEASE.... I want to have hockey discussions with people on my level, not people who think beating the rival for two seasons is the end-all and be-all to aim for.
elFreak
oh boy price just pulled a patrick roy.
bye bye silver platter kid.
(he sucked hard and when he made a routine save the crowd cheered him mockingly and he put his hands in the air.)
looks like he will be gone, thank for that.
DJ Eco
"Rangers SUCK, Flyers SWALLOW!"
chimera66
i'm stunned...
sean5
aww the poor swamp fans are worried that the devils might get beat in the first round. i guess it's ok as it would save you from defeat at the hands of the rangers.
LOL
ovechkin finally scored. 1 in 30+ shots is a pretty good shooting percentage. HAHAHAHAH
sean5
quote:
Originally posted by DJ Eco
Can I say it again? WIN A CUP, PLEASE.... I want to have hockey discussions with people on my level, not people who think beating the rival for two seasons is the end-all and be-all to aim for.
rangers won in 94, but i guess that was before you jumped on the devils bandwagon. had you been watching hockey you would have actually known that. this is the new nhl with different rules and in this new nhl, the rangers have absolutely raped the devils and seeing as they will have lundqvist for a long time, you better get used to it.
DJ Eco
quote:
Originally posted by sean5
aww the poor swamp fans are worried that the devils might get beat in the first round.
Our series is 2-2 an our team is the better more consistent one, we're not worried... The odds for us to lose our series is the same as yours. You guys lost one of your games 4-0 and you're playing in Washington to an angry 2nd place Eastern Conference leader.
You'd be RETARDED to think you're in the clear now..
DJ Eco
quote:
Originally posted by sean5
rangers won in 94, but i guess that was before you jumped on the devils bandwagon. had you been watching hockey you would have actually known that. this is the new nhl with different rules and in this new nhl, the rangers have absolutely raped the devils and seeing as they will have lundqvist for a long time, you better get used to it.
Well, I was 7 years old at the time and was a Devils fan, so nice job bringing up the bandwagon point. What else are you going to throw at me, our lack of attendance (which is only 1500 lower yearly average than the Rags, whoa!), or how about Brodeur's affair with his sister-and-law (who cares!)? You're showing with each post you're a typical Ranger fan with absolutely NO idea about the game and the same talking points...
What it comes down to in the end is you guys are not a consistent or good team by any means. No one is scared of the Rangers and no one really respects them. Lundqvuist and Dubinsky are your only good players, but compared to the other better 16 teams in the league, that's not much.
Even if the Rangers have raped the Devils in this "new NHL", they're not doing a good job at raping anyone else, seeing as they finished 7th and even after tonight's game, no one thinks they are Cup contenders. Go read a Wikipedia article on hockey, it'll do you more good than the knowledge you have now..
sean5
quote:
Originally posted by DJ Eco
Our series is 2-2 an our team is the better more consistent one, we're not worried... The odds for us to lose our series is the same as yours. You guys lost one of your games 4-0 and you're playing in Washington to an angry 2nd place Eastern Conference leader.
You'd be RETARDED to think you're in the clear now..
the better more consistent one? really? 2-2 against a team that finished 2nd in the scrubiest division meanwhile the rangers are 3-1 against the 1st team in that division - a team that also finished ahead of the swampers. the odds are not the same. it's apparent that "your level" is that of a 10 year old. do everyone a favor and go back to listening to sean tyas. leave the hockey talk to people who actually know something. last time i checked my picks were raping the rest of the board.
sean5
quote:
Originally posted by DJ Eco
Well, I was 7 years old at the time and was a Devils fan, so nice job bringing up the bandwagon point. What else are you going to throw at me, our lack of attendance (which is only 1500 lower average than Rags, whoa!), or how about Brodeur's affair with his sister-and-law? You're showing with each post you're a typical Ranger fan with absolutely NO idea about the game...
Even if the Rangers have raped the Devils in this "new NHL", they're not doing a good job at raping anyone else, seeing as they finished 7th and even after tonight's game, no one thinks they are Cup contenders. Go read a Wikipedia article on hockey, it'll do you more good than the knowledge you have now..
7 years old so that's like 3 years ago you started watching hockey right? the rangers have made the playoffs every season so apparently they have been one of the best 16 teams in the league over that span.
next, lol.
DJ Eco
quote:
Originally posted by sean5
the better more consistent one? really?
Losing 4-0 in your last game and barely squeeking by this one, that's not consistent. If you guys win the next game in Washington and seal the series, I'll be the first to say good job and call it an upset, because that's what it would be. But don't count your chickens...
