return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 
dear america AKA mellymel is not at all racist (pg. 57)
View this Thread in Original format
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
It doesn't have anything to do with free trade. The idea is that lower taxes on the wealthy will cause them to buy more, which will give poor people more jobs -- you got that part right.


that is only a small part of it. and it has a LOT to do with free trade economics. the example i gave you is a perfect example of 'trickle down' thinking.
MrJiveBoJingles
Trickle-down theory doesn't even address international trade. It is a theory about what government tax policies are best within a nation's economy (low taxes on highest earners).
Lebezniatnikov
It doesn't necessarily HAVE to be free trade - though that can create the conditions for accumulation of wealth in the elite. In Africa, the idea was that by funneling billions of dollars through aid and free trade (mostly primary commodities), some of that wealth would trickle down.

But it didn't - in fact, 85% of aid money put into some African countries never reaches the lower class.

When a system predicated on greed somehow argues that accumulation among the wealthy is good for the poor, it just leaves me shaking my head.
Lebezniatnikov
quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Trickle-down theory doesn't even address international trade. It is a theory about what government tax policies are best within a nation's economy (low taxes on highest earners).


It's both - the difference between the Reagan version (domestic) and the Thatcher version (more international).
MrJiveBoJingles
quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
It's both - the difference between the Reagan version (domestic) and the Thatcher version (more international).

Okay. I had only heard of the Reagan version.
MrJiveBoJingles
quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
When a system predicated on greed somehow argues that accumulation among the wealthy is good for the poor, it just leaves me shaking my head.

When the top earners get richer, the poor benefit by the increased availability of yacht-building jobs, donchaknow?

;)
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
It doesn't necessarily HAVE to be free trade - though that can create the conditions for accumulation of wealth in the elite. In Africa, the idea was that by funneling billions of dollars through aid and free trade (mostly primary commodities), some of that wealth would trickle down.

But it didn't - in fact, 85% of aid money put into some African countries never reaches the lower class.

When a system predicated on greed somehow argues that accumulation among the wealthy is good for the poor, it just leaves me shaking my head.


well, maybe i see it as related to free trade because that's the only way i believe anything can ever "trickle down" to anyone! in australia at least trickling always seemed to revolve around the context of free trade, but im happy to be corrected by you two :)
Lebezniatnikov
quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
Okay. I had only heard of the Reagan version.


That's the dominant use of the term here in the US - but it's the same principle really - both cause the same effect of amassing wealth among the wealthy and hoping that increased consumption will eventually work its way down to the poor - by way of money passing from rich households to firms to manufacturers, and eventually out to individuals in the form of wages.

In practice, there is very little evidence to suggest it works - certainly not in anything approaching the short term.
noikeee
quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
1. Trickle-down economics doesn't work. That's why we're in the place we are


Well, you're the biggest, most badass economy in the world. I always assumed the US were the top world power thanks to being capitalistic as and having very big-corporation-friendly laws.

I presume you're talking about the present financial crisis though. :p
Lebezniatnikov
quote:
Originally posted by noikeee
Well, you're the biggest, most badass economy in the world. I always assumed the US were the top world power thanks to being capitalistic as and having very big-corporation-friendly laws.

I presume you're talking about the present financial crisis though. :p


Yeah - I'm talking mostly about the bursting of the credit bubble.

However, it's worth noting that 38 million Americans live in poverty - that's like the entire population of France.

enydo
quote:
Originally posted by noikeee
Well, you're the biggest, most badass economy in the world.


Not for much longer, and that's if we even are anymore. :p
Alex
quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Yeah - I'm talking mostly about the bursting of the credit bubble.

However, it's worth noting that 38 million Americans live in poverty - that's like the entire population of France.


France has over 60 million people :p

(Wait, was that sarcasm about being an ignorant American? :p)
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 
Privacy Statement