return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 
Would you ever have children? (pg. 30)
View this Thread in Original format
Lira
quote:
Originally posted by Fledz
Shouldn't life be easier these days?

And it is. That's why divorce rates are higher, there's more fat people around, and so on... makes perfect sense to me: it's easy to do the right thing, and it's also simple to do the stuff we don't really find laudable.
Lews
quote:
Originally posted by Sushipunk
On its own, yes. Ohhh, but with the right bits and pieces of goodness.... mmmmm.


Indeed :)
Fledz
quote:
Originally posted by Lira
And it is. That's why divorce rates are higher, there's more fat people around, and so on... makes perfect sense to me: it's easy to do the right thing, and it's also simple to do the stuff we don't really find laudable.

Yea good point.
fughawzi
quote:
Originally posted by Fledz Have we become so politically correct and study focused that we've actually headed backwards?


No? The problem doesn't lie with actually, you know, conducting scientific studies. Most people aren't sitting around reading the results from studies, they're learning about them from a media source which messes everything up. Studies cannot be applied outside of their designated population (i.e., a study done on male adolescents with ADD cannot be applied to all adolescents). Media outlets do not seem to realise and/or care about this and then they sensationalize to gather interest. Those conducting the studies understand that they may be contradicted at a later date.

I think it is extremely important that people make informed decisions about raising children and going about their daily lives. Instinct and recommendations come from a good place, but they're not consistently reliable.
SYSTEM-J
quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
I half regret saying that each time I see it. I'm not sure if I believe it anymore after reading it so many times. It's kind of a paradox in the first place - perhaps the world really is getting worse because it's becoming more televised.


I think if you'd said "society" then the phrase would have been more paradoxical, but as "the world" it becomes an almost epistemological statement. I'm increasingly concerned with the cognitive biases of nostalgia that have led to our generation having this wistful yearning for an idealised fictional past just out of memory.

quote:
Originally posted by PivotTechno
Regardless of whether it's 100 or 200, I don't recall our forebearers of the 1800s as being in possession of nuclear arsenals with the capacity to fly over to their target of invasion in a number of hours, nor do I recall them having the technology to do near-irreparable damage to the environments of the countries whose resources they chose to exploit. With that in mind, along with skyrocketing population rates (world population was under a billion for 1800 years, yet somehow we've done that seven times over in the past 200) and documented environmental changes (desertification, toxic watersystems, et al), I'd venture it's safe to say that the playing field has changed considerably over the past couple of hundred years.


You realise mankind has been wiping out species since we invented the spear, that large parts of America were deforested by native Americans and are now deserts (in fact, the EB has it that up to 9/10ths of all deforestation happened before 1950), that genocide, invasion and endless war is almost as old as humanity, and that those nuclear arsenals are probably the only thing that have forced our species to sober up and pick our fights more carefully?

The playing field has changed, but it's an utterly ludicrous view of the past to say it was better to be a child in the pre-industrial era, especially if you were unlucky enough to be born with health problems.
MrJiveBoJingles
The main reason the "nature / nurture" debate is still going on is that it disappoints parents (or those who want to become parents) to think that, short of abuse or some other extreme situation, their kids would probably turn out much the same even if they were raised by someone else. People want to think that they are the shapers of their kids' souls, when in fact they are mostly just the providers of raw material that is then tempered a little by peer environment.

If not for that sentimental factor, things would be nicely wrapped up in favor of genetics.
PivotTechno
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
You realise mankind has been wiping out species since we invented the spear


But we've never done so in an attempt to sustain the needs of nearly 7 billion people.

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
large parts of America were deforested by native Americans and are now deserts (in fact, the EB has it that up to 9/10ths of all deforestation happened before 1950)


You forgot to mention this part of the article:

quote:
All that has changed since the mid-twentieth century is that an ancient process has accelerated, and that, compared to previous ages, environments more sensitive and irreversibly damaged have been affected.


Native Americans might have contributed to some NA deforestation, but the map tells me that it's accelerated considerably in the past 150 years.



quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
The playing field has changed, but it's an utterly ludicrous view of the past to say it was better to be a child in the pre-industrial era, especially if you were unlucky enough to be born with health problems


Skewed Western vantage aside, how about whether it's better to be a human in the era in which we currently reside?
MrJiveBoJingles
If you really want the old ways, stop posting mere rants on the Internet, move somewhere that has a lot less technology, and make friends with the local communities.

;)
zoogla
what the hell is wrong with you, of course yes.
PivotTechno
quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
If you really want the old ways, stop posting mere rants on the Internet, move somewhere that has a lot less technology, and make friends with the local communities.

;)


Who said anything about pining for the old ways? How about an increased focus on sustainability, taking the place of our current, locust-like habits?

Lira
quote:
Originally posted by PivotTechno
Who said anything about pining for the old ways? How about an increased focus on sustainability, taking the place of our current, locust-like habits?

Isn't it something people have been trying to achieve anyway?
PivotTechno
quote:
Originally posted by fayraree
what the hell is wrong with you, of course yes.


"Skewed Western vantage aside"
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 
Privacy Statement