|
9/11 RIP to the Fallen & F*CK the US GOV (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: |
In 2008, Zdeněk P. Bažant, Professor of Civil Engineering and Materials Science at Northwestern University, published with three coauthors a paper to examine whether allegations of controlled demolition might be scientifically justifiable. They found that the available video records are not consistent with the free fall hypothesis, that the size of the concrete particles is consistent with comminution caused by impact, and that the high velocity of compressed air explains why material from the towers were ejected to a distance of several hundred meters from the tower. The authors conclude that the allegations of controlled demolition do not have any scientific merit.[46] A spokesman for NIST said that any sightings of molten metal, including metal seen pouring from the South tower, were likely molten aluminum from the airplane, an explanation disputed by Richard Gage who stated that the colour of the molten metal rules out aluminum.[47] "Basically, gravity and the utter force of the upper floors forced the towers down," said NIST spokesperson Michael Newman.[40]
|
here is the peer reviewed article:
http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/p...0Cause%20It.pdf
enough bull please.. Bring on some hard facts here.. anyone can blindly sign a petition. Id like to see all the names of those who signed it, do they really have the guts to publish their name to something that there is no FACTUAL evidence about? not to mention the reputation of their designations? |
|
|
| kotsy |
| Loose Change is a load of bullocks |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
| Question for the "experts" here, could someone please explain to me about all those "secondary explosions" heard that came from both towers? if there was no other explosion why would those people lie about it? I would like to have an actual explanation please. |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
Because you are an idiot hardcore trancer.
Seriously, shut the up. |
|
|
| kotsy |
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
Because you are an idiot hardcore trancer. |
that makes sense |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
Because you are an idiot hardcore trancer.
Seriously, shut the up. |
:conf: what did I ever do to you? come say to my face next time.;) |
|
|
| DaRoZa |
i used to buy all this BS but at some point i saw past the rhetoric and scary music. for any of the conspiracy theories to be the least bit valid, hundreds or thousands of gov't employees, flight controllers, police, firefighters, experts in a multitude of fields, etc would all have to be aware and part of it. and all kept their conscience under control for 9 years without sharing a shred of proof that there was something shady going on (interviews with alex jones etc. don't count)
a lot of the "evidence" is little observations of the towers going down... as if the physics of crashing massive objects have been tested before and we know the subtleties of what was to be seen and heard should they have "normally" fell. |
|
|
| hasbone |
| quote: | Originally posted by hardcore trancer
:conf: what did I ever do to you? come say to my face next time.;) |
 |
|
|
| Eager Kid Mono |
| quote: | Originally posted by hardcore trancer
:conf: what did I ever do to you? come say to my face next time.;) |
Come suck my aids infected cock |
|
|
| Comrade Stalin |
| quote: | Originally posted by hardcore trancer
Question for the "experts" here, could someone please explain to me about all those "secondary explosions" heard that came from both towers? if there was no other explosion why would those people lie about it? I would like to have an actual explanation please. |
Any number of things can explode in a building as large as the twin towers. Why that sound just HAS to be demolition charges (even though absolutely no demolition materials were ever found, i.e. demolition caps, charges, etc), I just don't know. In addition to the fact that who would have set those demolition charges, is completely unanswered. Given the fact that it would take tonnes of explosives to bring down both towers, how such an operation was kept secret, is beyond me. Not to mention the fact that whoever took part must have either been killed or just kept their mouths shut, so as to keep it secret. Absolutely impossible. |
|
|
| yankeeBaby |
| quote: | Originally posted by hardcore trancer
Question for the "experts" here, could someone please explain to me about all those "secondary explosions" heard that came from both towers? if there was no other explosion why would those people lie about it? I would like to have an actual explanation please. |
I just watched a show on PBS today on the conspiracies, including ideas from "Loose Change" et al. They took the theories and compared them with expert witnesses and professionals (ie: structural engineers for certain questions, etc.....) They took one theory at a time and dissected it with the arguments from both sides, which leads you to make your own conclusion. Interesting to watch, I would recommend it, because it doesnt necessarily point you in either direction, which is good imo.
Edit: I tagged hardcore because they addressed this question...
On that note, can we please make a separate "R.I.P" and conspiracy thread? Today was a dark day in NYC, Washington, USA and the world, and out of respect for the lives lost, perhaps we dont argue politics and conspiracies in the same breath as sending condolences :( :( :( |
|
|
|
|
