return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Local Scene Info / Discussion / EDM Event Listings > Canada > Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 
How many of you take E? (pg. 18)
View this Thread in Original format
rabbitjoker
quote:
Originally posted by Swamper
haha "Adam"


wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! :stongue:
Skipper
quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
Dude why don't you just quit while you're ahead, your arguments are getting worse with each successive post.

It's not socially acceptable because most people are ignorant about it (like you) and only know that it's illegal. It's not illegal because it's a "fake illusion almost". :rolleyes:


haha - I can just picture Aaron saying "fake illusion almost" and then rolling his eyes.
bluE_Neon
quote:
Originally posted by StereoPrincess
Their is no use trying to argue these points.

There are people in the world that will always try to put down what others do to make themselves think that those people are bad in someway.

If you in your mind think that you are better than someone else because they use a chemical in moderation and you don't, then you are just fooling yourself.

We can argue about the effects of MDMA on and on. I personally don't like arguing these things because nothing is conclusive either way so there is no point.


Woahhhh, adda spirit Goska! Come to think of it, most Polacks I know, are either alcs or junkies/semi-junkies, whatever you wanna call it. The way I see it, all older polacks drink madly, the younger generation (like us) is into the chemicals :stongue: Ofcourse drinking once in a while isn't prohibited!


quote:
Originally posted by cap
I know friends who have had sex on E and are extremely depressed because nothing can naturally simulate the feeling.


Well thats a big bummer man. I've had sex many times on a comedown and it's the best feeling in the world. But sex on the actual high is impossible :disbelief
starsearcher
quote:
Originally posted by bluE_Neon
Well thats a big bummer man. I've had sex many times on a comedown and it's the best feeling in the world. But sex on the actual high is impossible :disbelief


Why not? Do you get a limp fish? :thepirate
arek
62.00%

not bad at all.
cap
quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
That is positively THE DUMBEST ING ARGUMENT I've ever heard. I think I just lost whatever respect I might have had for your intellectual faculties.

Ever heard of evolution, you moron? We evolve for our own survival, not personal pleasure. In fact, I can see many ways for which having a "magic button" like that would be detrimental to our species' survival in the long term. Unless of course the "magic button" you're talking about is your genitals, which is a button for pleasure AND procreation.


This is not an argument, it is my personal opinion. As I said a sentence later in the post.

You criticizing it proves your ignorance. We are all entitled to our personal opinions, without being called a "moron."

Diginut, you have a poor mindset in general. When you read someone's post, it seems as though your first priority is to pick out what is negative, what you don't like, and what you can criticize with ease.

Starve the negative, feed the positive.

Besides, what I mean is that anyone who knowingly and willingly chemically alters their body with a man-made drug like ecstacy , in my opinion, has no respect for their bodies, and has lost all spiritual integrity. E stands for exploitation (of the body) not ectasy.

But, hey, in the 21st century, who has spiritual/moral integrity anyways?:rolleyes:
bluE_Neon
quote:
Originally posted by starsearcher
Why not? Do you get a limp fish? :thepirate


Nah it's not that I got a limp fish, it's rather that my mind seems to be occupied on other stuff, which is music & only music. Ofcourse once in a odd time I do get a more confidence in myself but thats if the music & vibe is really ty.
starsearcher
Wait I don't get it...so when youre high...and you're having sex...you can't concentrate on hitting the target or sumthin'?
exergo
wow this thread has exploded....

if e weren't around....trance would not exist as the scale it does now...think about it..if there were no drugs tiesto would come and draw 400 people..not 4,000

meanwhile, whomever knocked me for feeling i "need" to drink or dose at a club neeeds to understand that clubs are designed for such activities...everyone is drinking, clubs make money that way..if i want to listen to good music while staying sober i can do that at home....i can't go get freaky with 1,000 people in my basement...i go out sober quite a bit as i like to take my car downtown.....its enjoyable and i'm usually able to have a great time......but not quite as fun and usually way to predictable

and honestly it's pretty much impossible to convert someone from top 40-hip hop- rock to EDM without the involvement of drugs...thay may enjoy it but to reeally get someone into it there nees to be that addition... it has happened to sooo may people i know...that moment :P
DigiNut
quote:
Originally posted by cap
This is not an argument, it is my personal opinion. As I said a sentence later in the post.

You criticizing it proves your ignorance. We are all entitled to our personal opinions, without being called a "moron."

Diginut, you have a poor mindset in general. When you read someone's post, it seems as though your first priority is to pick out what is negative, what you don't like, and what you can criticize with ease.

Starve the negative, feed the positive.

Besides, what I mean is that anyone who knowingly and willingly chemically alters their body with a man-made drug like ecstacy , in my opinion, has no respect for their bodies, and has lost all spiritual integrity. E stands for exploitation (of the body) not ectasy.

But, hey, in the 21st century, who has spiritual/moral integrity anyways?:rolleyes:

If you're free to express your opinions, no matter how offensive they are, we're free to express ours, no matter how little you like them.

You are telling me to stop being objective simply for the sake of liking what you have to say. That isn't going to work. Objectivism is not negativity - there's a difference - learn it.

Honestly, you sound like a ing evangelist. Before you open your pie hole again, keep in mind that not all of us are interested in spirituality and even many who are spiritual DO NOT think that "morals" have anything whatsoever to do with "spiritual integrity" of spirituality in general. Do everyone a favour and don't bring religion or spirituality into the subject of man-made chemical substances. Nobody, and I mean nobody, wants to hear it.

DigiNut
quote:
Originally posted by starsearcher
Wait I don't get it...so when youre high...and you're having sex...you can't concentrate on hitting the target or sumthin'?

You wouldn't be having sex to begin with. You just aren't interested.

Think of it this way - if you're bored, and you see a porno come on TV, you might be tempted to watch it. But let's say you're already in the middle of a pounding session, well the TV at that point is really just going to be a needless distraction.

It's like that. Your mind's just occupied with other things. Pursuit of sex is really the pursuit of pleasure and you already have that in the music and the vibe and your own self-acceptance, so you don't need it and don't want it, most of the time.
starsearcher
hhhmmmm that doesn't really make any sense...I think...to a sober person :p but alright...

So what if you take e in your bedroom with you girl and then have sex???
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 
Privacy Statement