|
girlfriend situation (pg. 5)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| FuzzQi |
| You guys need to talk |
|
|
| SuspicionVandit |
| blow into her ear. that'll teach her who's her daddy. |
|
|
| r5a |
 |
|
|
| DELPHINA |
Don't worry!
You 'll find another pie...
hmm girlfriend i wanted to say!
:rolleyes: |
|
|
| Arbiter |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
I like how everyone's saying she's a whore when the guy cheated on her first. It doesn't make her actions justified, but she's just showing him that she's as ready for a serious relationship as he is: this is either over or they're made for one another :) |
Technically, he only kissed another girl, whereas the clear implication is that she's taking it up the ass from at least twelve different guys. That's hardly comparable.
I might personally doubt that his cheating was limited to kissing, and I might personally suspect that her behavior was mere (but, obviously, effective) manipulation. But at this point, I'm obligated to construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. |
|
|
| idoru |
| Not to re-hash a thread from last month, but kissing can and typically does qualify as "cheating". |
|
|
| idoru |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
It is common practice for people to try and intentionally get their mate to be jealous in an attempt to remind them that they are desirable (if other men want her, then he should want her too). |
Sane people do not do this. |
|
|
| Arbiter |
| quote: | Originally posted by idoru
Not to re-hash a thread from last month, but kissing can and typically does qualify as "cheating". |
It seems pretty clear to me that it's all about context.
But whether you want to call it cheating or not, 'cheating' is not a very informative or useful label. If I told you that there was an organism at your back door, I could be referring to a bacterium or a rhinoceros. While the term 'organism' is obviously even broader than the term 'cheating,' both are so broad that their use to describe a particular set of facts is essentially an exercise in obfuscation.
Anyway, what I'm trying to say here is that the original poster's girlfriend has a rhinoceros at her back door. |
|
|
| DigitalPhoenix |
The pie is full of lies...ask Jenny.
PS: Cockbags |
|
|
| TranceGiant |
| quote: | Originally posted by Arbiter
It seems pretty clear to me that it's all about context.
But whether you want to call it cheating or not, 'cheating' is not a very informative or useful label. If I told you that there was an organism at your back door, I could be referring to a bacterium or a rhinoceros. While the term 'organism' is obviously even broader than the term 'cheating,' both are so broad that their use to describe a particular set of facts is essentially an exercise in obfuscation.
Anyway, what I'm trying to say here is that the original poster's girlfriend has a rhinoceros at her back door. |
| quote: |
Frigaliment Importing Co. v. B.N.S. International Sales Corp.
190 F.Supp. 116 (S.D.N.Y. 1960)
The issue is, what is chicken?
Plaintiff says 'chicken' means a young chicken, suitable for broiling and frying. Defendant says 'chicken' means any bird of that genus that meets contract specifications on weight and quality, including what it calls 'stewing chicken' and plaintiff pejoratively terms 'fowl'. Dictionaries give both meanings, as well as some others not relevant here. To support its, plaintiff sends a number of volleys over the net; defendant essays to return them and adds a few serves of its own. Assuming that both parties were acting in good faith, the case nicely illustrates Holmes' remark 'that the making of a contract depends not on the agreement of two minds in one intention, but on the agreement of two sets of external signs -- not on the parties' having meant the same thing but on their having said the same thing.' The Path of the Law, in Collected Legal Papers, p. 178 |
|
|
|
| Theresa |
| quote: | Originally posted by idoru
Sane people do not do this. |
It's often sub-conscious. |
|
|
|
|
