|
girlfriend situation (pg. 6)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| igottaknow |
I want to know more about the kiss. Were you both drunk? Did it happen more than once? Who initiated the kiss? Where was it, on the cheek, lips or on another body part? Was there tongue involved? Where were your hands while you were kissing her? How long did the kiss last? Did you make eye contact? What were you thinking about when you were kissing? Did she kiss better than your gf?
I can think of more questions but this should do for know. |
|
|
| CranberryJuice |
| quote: | Originally posted by TranceGiant
Originally posted by Arbiter
It seems pretty clear to me that it's all about context.
But whether you want to call it cheating or not, 'cheating' is not a very informative or useful label. If I told you that there was an organism at your back door, I could be referring to a bacterium or a rhinoceros. While the term 'organism' is obviously even broader than the term 'cheating,' both are so broad that their use to describe a particular set of facts is essentially an exercise in obfuscation.
Anyway, what I'm trying to say here is that the original poster's girlfriend has a rhinoceros at her back door.
quote:
Frigaliment Importing Co. v. B.N.S. International Sales Corp.
190 F.Supp. 116 (S.D.N.Y. 1960)
The issue is, what is chicken?
Plaintiff says 'chicken' means a young chicken, suitable for broiling and frying. Defendant says 'chicken' means any bird of that genus that meets contract specifications on weight and quality, including what it calls 'stewing chicken' and plaintiff pejoratively terms 'fowl'. Dictionaries give both meanings, as well as some others not relevant here. To support its, plaintiff sends a number of volleys over the net; defendant essays to return them and adds a few serves of its own. Assuming that both parties were acting in good faith, the case nicely illustrates Holmes' remark 'that the making of a contract depends not on the agreement of two minds in one intention, but on the agreement of two sets of external signs -- not on the parties' having meant the same thing but on their having said the same thing.' The Path of the Law, in Collected Legal Papers, p. 178
|
the nerdy lawyers at their best invaded TA
:o
clearly the road of perdition :o :nervous: |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| This thread reminds me how glad I am not to be a ing idiot. |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
This thread reminds me how glad I am not to be a ing idiot. |
:stongue: :stongue: :stongue:
And OP dude needs to grow some balls, man up to the mistake and then man up to his girl and get to steppin' out of the picture. Why would you post something of this nature in the CoR and not expect to get on? You must be one of those -whipped nice guys to put up with that crap - and then come on this forum in order to relieve some more of your self-imposed shame by volunteering that you're being humiliated by some broad you didn't care enough about not to find yourself in the ing situation that has you making one stupid decision after another. Seriously, was it before or after you kissed that other chick, that you suffered from a closed-head injury resulting in frontal lobe impairment?
She's got more balls than you do for doing it in a place where she knows you'll find out about it. Man up and tell her if she does it again, you'll leave and if she does it again, man up, thank her profusely for demonstrating that she's so ed up a warning label would have sufficed and GTFO! [/smack_talkin'_mofo]
Seriously, sorry all that happened, dude, but just end it. |
|
|
| igottaknow |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
This thread reminds me how glad I am not to be a ing idiot. |
Like your hand hasn't ever cheated on your bf by touching your pie. :rolleyes: |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| Wtf IGK humour. I can't help but laugh. :stongue: |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by Arbiter
Technically, he only kissed another girl, whereas the clear implication is that she's taking it up the ass from at least twelve different guys. That's hardly comparable. |
In all fairness, based on what he said, we may believe she's done anything ranging from a long unsexy talk about the human condition to a hardcore gangbang, while in his case, we know he did something she clearly wouldn't have approved of if she knew about it beforehand, yet he did it anyway. We can't really do any comparison with the working hypotheses we've been given so far :p
| quote: | Originally posted by Arbiter
I might personally doubt that his cheating was limited to kissing, and I might personally suspect that her behavior was mere (but, obviously, effective) manipulation. But at this point, I'm obligated to construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. |
I don't know - the girl didn't break up with him, as Idoru pointed out, and she may just be messing up with his head, even if that's a really smart move on her part. He wasn't really the apex of cleverness throughout his relationship anyway, so I stand by what I said: either they were made for one another and should smarten up together (if they ever do), or they should just call it a failure and move on. |
|
|
| igottaknow |
| The funny thing is this thread has got me hungry. I have a craving for some good pie. And no I mean the real type of pie. I'm going to stop by the grocery store tonight and pick me up blueberry or strawberry rhubarb, you know Trade Joe has some nice pies. A scope of vanilla ice cream and I'm in heaven. |
|
|
| Lews |
| Damn right they have some great ing pies. Had some strawberry rhubarb the other night from them, was delicious. |
|
|
| yukii |
| i want pie :mad: with vanilla icecream? anyone? :( |
|
|
| jupiterone |
break up, find a new girl
unless you're dating eva mendes |
|
|
| RapidFire |
| quote: | Originally posted by Arbiter
I suggest cheating. |
I agree. |
|
|
|
|
