|
How do you like your pen0r? (pg. 28)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
What I am saying is that female genital mutilation is equivalent to male genital mutilation in terms of severity in my opinion. |
And you’d be completely wrong. I mean honestly :rolleyes: |
|
|
| FuzzQi |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
In terms of function (protection and the production of warm/moist/smegma friendly environment,) I would guess that the labia majora would be more analogous to the foreskin. In terms of nerve-endings/pleasure receptors, I don't really know. |
I agree with you.
Male circumcision ~ Female circumcision
As humans develop, the area that develops into the foreskin in males develops into the labia majora in females, with the upper part the equivalent of the hood. |
|
|
| astroboy |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
My point of contention is mainly this idea that it's "mutilation" in anything but the strictest sense. Regardless of the stupid religious reasons, female circumcision for me is a -load more severe and totally, unequivocally pointless compared to male circumcision. |
There are many many different variations of traditional female genital modification, some more and some less severe than the classic procedure for male genital modification. All variations are (rightly) illegal.
Needless to say the consequences for some of the more severe forms of female genital modification are quite horrific, particularly in terms of the complications that arise during childbirth. |
|
|
| astroboy |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
As I suspected, we're talking about different studies.
|
Cool. Could u give a citation for the one to which you were referring? |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| quote: | Originally posted by astroboy
Cool. Could u give a citation for the one to which you were referring? |
http://mrw.interscience.wiley.com/c...362/pdf_fs.html
It pools results from three seperate studies conducted in different countries. On closer inspection, one looks like it is the South Africa study you mentioned, so my mistake there, but it also uses two other studies of similar size, and all three were stopped early due to the significance of the findings. |
|
|
| Slylee |
| what a bunch of fags sitting here talking about cocks for 9 pages:wtf: you guys must really have some issues about yours:stongue: |
|
|
| ChemEnhanced |
| quote: | Originally posted by Slylee
what a bunch of fags sitting here talking about cocks for 9 pages:wtf: you guys must really have some issues about yours:stongue: |
you're one to talk....you talk about your for countless pages and in countless threads...heck you even talk about cocks you don't have anymore |
|
|
| Slylee |
| quote: | Originally posted by ChemEnhanced
you're one to talk....you talk about your for countless pages and in countless threads...heck you even talk about cocks you don't have anymore |
LOL you posted a lot in this thread didn't u:p |
|
|
| tubularbills |
 |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by Slylee
what a bunch of fags sitting here talking about cocks for 9 pages:wtf: you guys must really have some issues about yours:stongue: |
This thread had everything to become a hit right from the start. It's got religion, cocks, science, cocks, STD's, cocks, gun control, cocks, mutilation, dicks, doughnuts, cocks, and the pleasant fact that you can correct someone else on the internet that happens to be wrong.
This has Freud spilled all over it! |
|
|
| woscar |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
This thread had everything to become a hit right from the start. It's got religion, cocks, science, cocks, STD's, cocks, gun control, cocks, mutilation, dicks, doughnuts, cocks, and the pleasant fact that you can correct someone else on the internet that happens to be wrong.
This has Freud spilled all over it! |
:stongue:
Regarding the OP, I wouldn't know what to say since I've had my pen0r circumcised for as long as I can remember and I'm pretty happy with it. :p |
|
|
| Slylee |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
This thread had everything to become a hit right from the start. It's got religion, cocks, science, cocks, STD's, cocks, gun control, cocks, mutilation, dicks, doughnuts, cocks, and the pleasant fact that you can correct someone else on the internet that happens to be wrong.
This has Freud spilled all over it! |
:stongue:
i was just busting balls u guys. kinda like how some of u peek into the chick thread and make snarky comments about how we talk about our boyfriends too much.:gsmile: |
|
|
|
|