|
The Arrivals: The Foundation of the Anti-Christ (pg. 35)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by basilisk
"Admitted"? I did the primary research here so we can have a rational discussion of your theories and get beyond all the mud-slinging. Instead you're making a big deal out of something inconsequential with no regard for the dozens of occasions you've been caught promulgating outright falsehoods. And "plagiarize"? Do you even know what that word means? My sources are cited in the text unlike yours. Anyway, since you seem so intent on being an I'm not about to sink any more energy into this. |
You specifically said the Hudson building was a fraction of the size of WTC building 7 to prove your point. Would you like me to quote you?
It took all of 5 minutes to check what you posted to prove otherwise from the very same source which you provided.
Hudson building: 2.2 million square feet, 420 feet by 220 feet footprint
WTC building 7: roughly 1.9 million square feet, 330 feet by 140 feet footprint.
Which building would take longer to rig up because as evidenced by your initial post it can be done with a whopping 12 man crew on a much larger building. |
|
|
| basilisk |
Did you miss the part where I said "yes, you got that right" or do you just need to hear it over and over again? Again, for the 1000th time: if you're going to make a claim of controlled demolition you can do the leg work to build a case, as I have started to do. I wasn't out to prove a point, I was assessing the sort of data we have access to, and where we might begin to flesh things out. And like I said, JL Hudson is a fraction the size of WTC 1 and WTC 2. I conflated that with WTC 7 when I wrote the comment you have written several messages about. So what? I acknowledge the correction and usually we'd move on. TA is not a peer-reviewed journal; I'm not spending a lot of time going over my notes to make sure everything is correct. I was interested in discussing the topic and seeing what we can find. You're interested in scoring points and ad hominem attacks. No rational dialogue is possible within this context.
See, having a rough idea of how much manpower is required to rig up a building of a similar size is just the beginning of building a case. You would want to go over the schedules, calculate how much material would need to be moved, how the building would be wired (the example of JL Hudson was based on tens of thousands of feet of detonator cord--not something you could put into the WTC complex), and so on. You know, use your head to start figuring things out and move being blatant statements of fact without and procedural logic involved. But I see you're not interested in anything like this... no, you just want to crow about petty message board victories. Well, have fun. |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
Wow, when i talked to Karim last night i almost didn't believe him when he told me that the tinfoil hats had invaded TOTA... culrout didn't you get enough of a reaming in the PDD for this topic? Actually last time i checked (which has been a while) the mere mention of 9/11 in the PDD these days is akin to invoking a Hitler comparison in an debate...
your kind have had 9 years to come up with some kind of credible evidence and a peer reviewed alternate theory and to date you have accomplished NOTHING....nada...zip...zilch
Its time for you to find a new crusade..... perhaps prove the medical validity of homeopathy...... |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by colonelcrisp
Wow, when i talked to Karim last night i almost didn't believe him when he told me that the tinfoil hats had invaded TOTA... culrout didn't you get enough of a reaming in the PDD for this topic? Actually last time i checked (which has been a while) the mere mention of 9/11 in the PDD these days is akin to invoking a Hitler comparison in an debate...
your kind have had 9 years to come up with some kind of credible evidence and a peer reviewed alternate theory and to date you have accomplished NOTHING....nada...zip...zilch
Its time for you to find a new crusade..... perhaps prove the medical validity of homeopathy...... |
Actually if you would have bothered to read this thread from the beginning you would know the invasion is quite the opposite. It has become cool to derail threads, troll and sling insults like PKC and your like always seem to do when someone posts an opinion or a different view point on this forum.
Your post couldn't be any more further from the truth. |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Actually if you would have bothered to read this thread from the beginning you would know the invasion is quite the opposite. It has become cool to derail threads, troll and sling insults like PKC and your like always seem to do when someone posts an opinion or a different view point on this forum.
Your post couldn't be any more further from the truth. |
my apologies, after having read all 11 pages of rational debate in this thread, i have now seen the errors of my ways. This is clearly just a presentation of pure factual unbiased evidence gathered from sound youtube research and evaluated by extremely intelligent 12 year old web sleuths... |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by basilisk
Did you miss the part where I said "yes, you got that right" or do you just need to hear it over and over again? Again, for the 1000th time: if you're going to make a claim of controlled demolition you can do the leg work to build a case, as I have started to do. I wasn't out to prove a point, I was assessing the sort of data we have access to, and where we might begin to flesh things out. And like I said, JL Hudson is a fraction the size of WTC 1 and WTC 2. I conflated that with WTC 7 when I wrote the comment you have written several messages about. So what? I acknowledge the correction and usually we'd move on. TA is not a peer-reviewed journal; I'm not spending a lot of time going over my notes to make sure everything is correct. I was interested in discussing the topic and seeing what we can find. You're interested in scoring points and ad hominem attacks. No rational dialogue is possible within this context.
See, having a rough idea of how much manpower is required to rig up a building of a similar size is just the beginning of building a case. You would want to go over the schedules, calculate how much material would need to be moved, how the building would be wired (the example of JL Hudson was based on tens of thousands of feet of detonator cord--not something you could put into the WTC complex), and so on. You know, use your head to start figuring things out and move being blatant statements of fact without and procedural logic involved. But I see you're not interested in anything like this... no, you just want to crow about petty message board victories. Well, have fun. |
You continue to neglect that a building which was bigger then WTC building 7 was demolished by controlled demolition even though it was actually done as you originally posted. The Hudson building was much bigger then WTC building 7, more then 5 NFL football fields bigger.
I find it extraordinary that you believe this is impossible when it has been done on a much larger scale yet you don't find it even more extraordinary that not one building in the history of mankind has fallen due to fires before or after 9/11. |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by colonelcrisp
|
Marc... this is the "meat guy" who earns a lot of money so he knows more about physics and engineering then you, right? |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
Marc... this is the "meat guy" who earns a lot of money so he knows more about physics and engineering then you, right? |
i keep forgetting i got my engineering license in a box of cracker jacks... the real engineering happens at the butcher shop |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by colonelcrisp
my apologies, after having read all 11 pages of rational debate in this thread, i have now seen the errors of my ways. This is clearly just a presentation of pure factual unbiased evidence gathered from sound youtube research and evaluated by extremely intelligent 12 year old web sleuths... |
For some reason I take someone that uses a quote from the biggest troll in the history of tranceaddict in his signature with a grain of salt.
PKC went crying to more then one individual after I called him out? |
|
|
| love_child |
| :stongue: at you guys comparing credentials over 9/11 |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by love_child
:stongue: at you guys comparing credentials over 9/11 |
Same old, same old.
He must be peer reviewed. |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by love_child
:stongue: at you guys comparing credentials over 9/11 |
sorry but it's funny that this guy claims to know more about engineering then an engineer, that's all. |
|
|
|
|
