|
The Arrivals: The Foundation of the Anti-Christ (pg. 39)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Comrade Stalin |
| quote: | Originally posted by Claude Hughes
This question has been asked and not one "usual suspect" (as Richard calls them) has answered this question
Anyone? |
Yea, and ing Roosevelt must have let Pearl Harbor happen on purpose too right!? :rolleyes: It's called negligence dude. The NSA refusing to cooperate with the FBI, etc. There is zero forensic evidence for a controlled demolition, PERIOD. And until any one of you can come up with that evidence, and publish your findings in a genuinely peer-reviewed publication, you have nothing to stand on. Let's cut the "I'm just asking questions" bull, and just admit you believe by some superhuman feat, a bunch of black ops guys set many tonnes of explosives in 3 different high rise buildings, wired them, undetected, with no whistle-blowers, no forensic evidence, no plot line, no names, and not to mention a huge jet liner crashed head on into the building. 's sake, are you people that ing thick? |
|
|
| Claude Hughes |
| quote: | Originally posted by richard raiban
The last few pages have been focused on "controlled demolition". A few of you are saying there is "no real hard evidence" that controlled demolition was used. Ok, lets take that aspect and put that a side for a moment. Let's assume that the building came crashing down because of the impact of both planes.
Having said that, do the usual suspects in this thread who are arguing "there is no evidence that CD was used" believe that the BUSH Administration are completely innocent and had "absolutely no involvement in the events that took place on 9/11?" I am really curious. Are you guys saying that the Bush Administration has clean hands in all of this?[/i][/b] |
| quote: | Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
Yea, and ing Roosevelt must have let Pearl Harbor happen on purpose too right!? :rolleyes: It's called negligence dude. The NSA refusing to cooperate with the FBI, etc. There is zero forensic evidence for a controlled demolition, PERIOD. And until any one of you can come up with that evidence, and publish your findings in a genuinely peer-reviewed publication, you have nothing to stand on. Let's cut the "I'm just asking questions" bull, and just admit you believe by some superhuman feat, a bunch of black ops guys set many tonnes of explosives in 3 different high rise buildings, wired them, undetected, with no whistle-blowers, no forensic evidence, no plot l
ine, no names, and not to mention a huge jet liner crashed head on into the building. 's sake, are you people that ing thick? |
:haha:
Did you learn how to respond to questions by reading the "Answering REAL questions for REAL dummies [George W Bush Edition] handbook? :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FD7B...be_gdata_player |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
if medical research was treated with the same degree of scientific integrity that you and culrout display, homeopathy would be considered valid, proven, solid medical treatment..... |
|
|
| Claude Hughes |
| quote: | Originally posted by colonelcrisp
if medical research was treated with the same degree of scientific integrity that you and culrout display, homeopathy would be considered valid, proven, solid medical treatment..... |
Seems like you read the same handbook. I know it's difficult but just try and answer that 1 simple question. |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by Claude Hughes
Seems like you read the same handbook. I know it's difficult but just try and answer that 1 simple question. |
show me where i stated that i think that the bush administration are innocent in 9/11. do i believe they were directly responsible? no, i don't give them that much credit. however i do tend to believe that they were grossly negligent in their assessment and handling of pre warnings and threat indicators.
as moral has said it quite eloquently, there as a great difference between incompetence and intention. It is my opinion that the US government and its agencies showed great incompetence in the events leading up to and following closely after 9/11.
As for all the arguments that 9/11 was staged to bring the nation into a unjustified war? i don't think that was anything more than opportunism and knee jerk reaction to the events of 9/11. were those decisions founded on proper evidence? probably not..... it was inevitable that at least one country was going to get bombed off the face of the map over the 9/11 events.
my biggest problem with the conspiracy movement beyond the technical fallacies that they purport as fact, is the overall notion that an administration or government organization who could co-ordinate, plan and execute a "false flag" operation of this scale would leave behind such a large trail of evidence (physical, documented and circumstantial) that could be found by a bunch of internet sleuths....
i mean honestly, if they had the ability and power to organize all of this, do you really think that dylan avery or steven jones would still be alive? I don't think so.... |
|
|
| Comrade Stalin |
It's pretty clear you don't give two s about scientific truth. It's ok, we all know you're just as ing stupid as culorut. Two words. Forensic evidence. Why don't you look it up? Oh, nevermind, no matter how illogical your idiotic conpiratorial views are shown to be, you'll still religiously believe in it, no matter what.
Again, there is zero forensic evidence for a controlled demolition, PERIOD. And until any one of you can come up with that evidence, and publish your findings in a genuinely peer-reviewed publication, you have nothing to stand on. |
|
|
| Goebbel Goebbel |
claude hughes is worthy of his avatar.
keep it up cletus! |
|
|
| Claude Hughes |
| quote: | Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
Again, there is zero forensic evidence for a controlled demolition, PERIOD. And until any one of you can come up with that evidence, and publish your findings in a genuinely peer-reviewed publication, you have nothing to stand on. |
:haha:
Thanks George W Bush Jr |
|
|
| Comrade Stalin |
| quote: | Originally posted by Claude Hughes
:haha:
Thanks George W Bush Jr |
I guess in your case, idiocy can't be cured, huh? |
|
|
| culorut |
| If the self proclaimed scholars would put their money where their mouth is maybe the rest of us uneducated folks wouldn't think they're just another idiot taking up valuable space. |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by colonelcrisp
show me where i stated that i think that the bush administration are innocent in 9/11. do i believe they were directly responsible? no, i don't give them that much credit. however i do tend to believe that they were grossly negligent in their assessment and handling of pre warnings and threat indicators.
as moral has said it quite eloquently, there as a great difference between incompetence and intention. It is my opinion that the US government and its agencies showed great incompetence in the events leading up to and following closely after 9/11.
As for all the arguments that 9/11 was staged to bring the nation into a unjustified war? i don't think that was anything more than opportunism and knee jerk reaction to the events of 9/11. were those decisions founded on proper evidence? probably not..... it was inevitable that at least one country was going to get bombed off the face of the map over the 9/11 events.
my biggest problem with the conspiracy movement beyond the technical fallacies that they purport as fact, is the overall notion that an administration or government organization who could co-ordinate, plan and execute a "false flag" operation of this scale would leave behind such a large trail of evidence (physical, documented and circumstantial) that could be found by a bunch of internet sleuths....
i mean honestly, if they had the ability and power to organize all of this, do you really think that dylan avery or steven jones would still be alive? I don't think so.... |
Checked the verified list yet?
You have plenty of time to troll like the ing idiot comrade does. |
|
|
| Claude Hughes |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Checked the verified list yet?
You have plenty of time to troll like the ing idiot comrade does. |
Don't hold your breath.
Comrade is so focused on CD. Unless we prove otherwise GWB is innocent :haha: |
|
|
|
|
