|
The Arrivals: The Foundation of the Anti-Christ (pg. 68)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| thesauce23 |
| quote: | Originally posted by basilisk
|
precisely. i just didn't want to write alot and clarify, so i'm glad you did it for me. |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
Whatever you think about peer-reviewed research, it is the only acceptable standard of scientific truth, PERIOD. End of story. There is no debate on that. |
You can use peer reviewed excuse all you want. The information and data contained within which was exaggerated, lied about and completely omitted is what really counts.
You put in you get out. It's not the reviewers fault, they had all to go on to say otherwise. |
|
|
| basilisk |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
An Al-qaeda suspect was mistakenly invited to the Pentagon for tea and biscuits? LOL |
Wasn't he suspected of links to Al-Qaeda long after the tea and biscuits? |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by basilisk
Wasn't he suspected of links to Al-Qaeda long after the tea and biscuits? |
Long before it. |
|
|
| Comrade Stalin |
| quote: | Originally posted by thesauce23
lol. no one is debating regarding peer-review and i don't need to THINK about peer-review, brah. take it easy, its really not that serious.... promise
and re-read the last sentence of my response. if you read it correctly, it should point out that i do agree about its relevance |
Just sayin', peer-reviewed publication actually is the end-all-be-all, in this debate. |
|
|
| Comrade Stalin |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
An Al-qaeda suspect was mistakenly invited to the Pentagon for tea and biscuits? LOL
ing ignorance is great. Bush is not guilty for protecting the interests of the fabricated Al-qaeda terrorists yet everything is just fine and dandy when all is presented to the public to invade a country they had no right to invade. They killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people and profited in the billions yet you're still using Alex Jones as a cop out.
Critical thinking. Got you. |
The Pentagon invited Al-Qaeda to lunch so they could hi-five each other on a 9/11 job well done. LOL. Listen to how utterly retarded you sound.
I hated Bush and the wars he got us into. Surprised? |
|
|
| Comrade Stalin |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
You can use peer reviewed excuse all you want. The information and data contained within which was exaggerated, lied about and completely omitted is what really counts.
You put in you get out. It's not the reviewers fault, they had all to go on to say otherwise. |
Excuse? LOL. Yea, right. :rolleyes: We already know scientific inquiry doesn't mean anything to you. We got it. Just don't ask me to believe in your 9/11 truth religion without it. Like I said, publish a peer-reviewed research document, or prosecute the supposed perpetrators. Otherwise, you've got nothing but sorry amateur excuses of investigative research. |
|
|
| Claude Hughes |
| quote: | Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
Whatever you think about peer-reviewed research, it is the only acceptable standard of scientific truth, PERIOD. End of story. There is no debate on that. |
Brutal |
|
|
| Claude Hughes |
| quote: | Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
I hated Bush and the wars he got us into. Surprised? |
No you dont George W Bush Jr. |
|
|
| Comrade Stalin |
| quote: | Originally posted by Claude Hughes
No you dont George W Bush Jr. |
If you want to call me George Bush Jr., at least do it the right way, George Bush III...dumb ass...:rolleyes: |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
Just sayin', peer-reviewed publication actually is the end-all-be-all, in this debate. |
No it's not.
Look at the casualty total estimates since Iraq occupation. This is a perfect example of how such large variations in numbers or conclusions (+/- 600,000) can be applied to all papers by using critical thinking, peer reviewed or not. You choose the peer reviewed paper in this debate because it fits with your side of the argument, not because it's scientific.
The Lancet reported (peer reviewed twice) the tally is over 600,000 deaths in Iraq.
The World Health Organization reported The Iraq Family Health Survey results at around 150,000 deaths.
Opinion Research Business reported the death tally at over 1.2 million.
The Iraq Body Count Project has their estimate at around 100,000 deaths.
I'll put money down you would take The Lancet because it's scientific. |
|
|
| Claude Hughes |
| quote: | Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
If you want to call me George Bush Jr., at least do it the right way, George Bush III...dumb ass...:rolleyes: |
You're our GWB Jr :D |
|
|
|
|
