alright fellas, im slowly getting over my jet lag, so am off to bed. please keep raping cretinrot and his ilk during my absence. but also let me know as soon as they have the 2nd investigation up and running! it should be any day now :stongue:
culorut
PKC, explain how your point bulletin list copied from a website that is biased towards anyone who has a differing opinion on anything discussed holds any merit.
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
:stongue: :stongue: :stongue:
brilliant.
well, at least they try a little harder than the bentham journal who published steven jones' fantasies- as well as that paper written by a bot! haha.
the world of science isn't debated in internet polls or petitions. please provide the journal articles published by these "engineers".
9 years and still nothing. why havent these THOUSANDS of engineers provided any work for you to gloat about? tick tock motherer.
colenelcrisp check that list yet?
Moral Hazard
I love this argument that a poll shows a majority of Aussies believe the official story is incorrect....
Even if that were the case; what the majority believes is not what determines factual validity. A majority of people once believed that the sun revolved around the earth... using culorut's logic that must have been true until such time as a majority of people changed their in' minds.
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
I love this argument that a poll shows a majority of Aussies believe the official story is incorrect....
Even if that were the case; what the majority believes is not what determines factual validity. A majority of people once believed that the sun revolved around the earth... using culorut's logic that must have been true until such time as a majority of people changed their in' minds.
A majority of the people also used to believe that 19 hijackers pulled off the greatest attack on America with Bin Laden giving directions from his secret bat cave. Today not so much.
:stongue:
Moral Hazard
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
A majority of the people also used to believe that 19 hijackers pulled off the greatest attack on America with Bin Laden giving directions from his secret bat cave. Today not so much.
The point here is that your argument regarding what a majority of Aussies believe or do not believe is immaterial to what is true or not true.... just as your argument above is also immaterial. In fact, pretty much every argument you have raised is immaterial and largely just a tactic to avoid answering the questions posed to you earlier; so again I will give you an opportunity to answer...
1) What was rigged for controlled demolition on 9/11: WTC 7, the twin towers, the Pentagon, or other structures?
2) How were the planes hijacked and by whom? (I've seen some allusions to Al-Qaeda being made up so I am curious to know who was responsible: US government operatives or what?)
3) Did a plane hit the Pentagon or was it something else?
Unless you attempt to answer any of the above then there is little point in continuing the discussion... you know; except to point out how little capacity for reasonable discussion and/or critical thinking you have; however, presumably all the rational people viewing this thread already have a good understanding of that, as you've provided ample evidence thusfar.
Comrade Stalin
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
It's even funnier that you ignore the fact that there is over 800 camps all guarded and empty in the USA yet you believe they are only there for the soul purpose of just taking up space.
If you believe that they all were set up to imprison only illegal Mexicans you're a ing tool also. Rex 84, reported since 1987 because of the Iran/Contra hearings.
Newsflash.
Keep ignoring history,
You are full of lies.
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
You are full of lies.
Faux News?
GTFO of here.
Zyklon_Jay
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Faux News?
GTFO of here.
quoted for irony.
fox news = not reputable source for sure...but have you seen your sources?:haha:
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
1) What was rigged for controlled demolition on 9/11: WTC 7, the twin towers, the Pentagon, or other structures?
2) How were the planes hijacked and by whom? (I've seen some allusions to Al-Qaeda being made up so I am curious to know who was responsible: US government operatives or what?)
3) Did a plane hit the Pentagon or was it something else?
1. WTC 1, 2 and 7 did not collapse due to fires, they were built to withstand multiple aircraft hits, hurricanes and earthquakes. Fires don't blow up buildings and cause them to fall to the ground at nearly the rate free fall. Find me another example of this in the history of mankind before or after 9/11. Good luck to you, I'm not buying another word or story from the same people which lied about WMD's in Iraq and everything else they spoke of.
2. Supposedly by hijackers (patsies) which did train in the US and were funded by the US government. Al-qaeda is a fabrication spin off group of terrorists set up and trained by the very same government that brought them here, they are one and the same. Trained to do the dirty work and used to foil the public into believing terrorists hate America's freedoms, they convinced the public to go to a fake war on terror by means of black ops. Nothing new here really.
quote:
Zbigniew Brzezinski not long ago revealed that on July 3, 1979, unknown to the American public and Congress, President Jimmy Carter secretly authorized $500 million to create an international terrorist movement that would spread Islamic fundamentalism in Central Asia and "de-stabilise" the Soviet Union... The CIA called this Operation Cyclone and in the following years poured $4 billion into setting up Islamic training schools in Pakistan (Taliban means "student").
Young zealots were sent to the CIA's spy training camp in Virginia, where future members of al-Qaeda were taught "sabotage skills"
3. You tell me, the official story says a plane hit the Pentagon yet provides no evidence to date that it was Flight 77.
Below is a close up of the entrance hole at the Pentagon before the exterior wall collapsed, firefighters sprayed foam to put out the flames as is visible on the windows above the entrance hole and around it. Care to explain how a Boeing 757 plane which apparently crashed a few feet below those windows did not manage to break the ing glass?
Now compare what a scaled drawing of what Flight 77 would have looked like next to the Pentagon to the video put out by the lying government you blindly believe in,
Houston, we have a problem.
Zyklon_Jay
things tend to look blurry when travelling at several hundreds of miles per hour as opposed to being parked beside something.
..but yeah, you are totally right..it was george w with a jetpack firing a bazooka.
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by Zyklon_Jay
quoted for irony.
fox news = not reputable source for sure...but have you seen your sources?:haha:
You mean the original court room hearing's from 1987 on Rex 84? No I don't know what you mean.
