return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 
The Arrivals: The Foundation of the Anti-Christ (pg. 55)
View this Thread in Original format
culorut
A B-25 Bomber crashed into the Empire state building in 1945, the building did not collapse due to the crash or the fires.






Care to provide an example of a steel framed building that collapsed at nearly the rate of free fall before or after 9/11 due to fires?
Comrade Stalin
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Faux News?

GTFO of here.


Fox news is gold compared to the bull you post. And I hate Fox News. Funny that you didn't even address the destruction of your delusional lies by the Popular Mechanics guest.
Comrade Stalin
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
You mean the original court room hearing's from 1987 on Rex 84? No I don't know what you mean.


Only an idiot like you would see the classified nature of "continuity of the state" in extreme circumstances, as some conspiracy to set up FEMA concentration camps. Do you know how much of a paranoid wing nut you sound like? I sure hope you aren't involved in Canadian politics. Do you vote? I sure hope you don't.
Comrade Stalin
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
That's odd because the other Pentagon videos don't show a plane either. Funny how planes are visible from the amateur footage in New York and not by the military security footage at the nations most secure building.


So video evidence means so much to you regarding the Pentagon, but when you see two planes hit the twin towers, you claim controlled demolition. LOL. :haha:
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
So video evidence means so much to you regarding the Pentagon, but when you see two planes hit the twin towers, you claim controlled demolition. LOL. :haha:


What video evidence stupid? All of the videos do not show Flight 77.
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
Only an idiot like you would see the classified nature of "continuity of the state" in extreme circumstances, as some conspiracy to set up FEMA concentration camps. Do you know how much of a paranoid wing nut you sound like? I sure hope you aren't involved in Canadian politics. Do you vote? I sure hope you don't.


Are you denying Rex 84 did not happen? If you are you sound like a ing idiot who knows about the very country you live in.


quote:
" These camps are to be operated by FEMA should martial law need to be implemented in the United States and all it would take is a presidential signature on a proclamation and the attorney general's signature on a warrant to which a list of names is attached."



What part of camps being operated by FEMA don't you quite understand if martial law is implemented?
basilisk
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
No plane crashed into WTC building 7. WTC 1 and 2 were designed to sustain multiple airplane strikes. Get your straight.


Your rate of disinformation would keep a team of people busy. Luckily, anyone swayed by your bull can easily verify these claims using Google... where, in this case, one will invariably find quantitative details such as the size and speed of airliner impact those towers were designed for. You know, numbers. Plug them into an equation and you can estimate things like kinetic energy etc. Not that an ignoramus like you would have any idea how to process such information. And that's the trend with all the nonsensical claims you post: they are either ambiguous (i.e. the geopolitics of 9/11) or can be cleared up by looking at actual data (i.e. the engineering and physical aspects of 9/11).

Doesn't matter though, you'll go on yammering about this until hell freezes over. I'm just waiting for the "melting point of steel" claim to drop, among other tired old and completely discredited troofer canards.
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by basilisk
Your rate of disinformation would keep a team of people busy. Luckily, anyone swayed by your bull can easily verify these claims using Google... where, in this case, one will invariably find quantitative details such as the size and speed of airliner impact those towers were designed for. You know, numbers. Plug them into an equation and you can estimate things like kinetic energy etc. Not that an ignoramus like you would have any idea how to process such information. And that's the trend with all the nonsensical claims you post: they are either ambiguous (i.e. the geopolitics of 9/11) or can be cleared up by looking at actual data (i.e. the engineering and physical aspects of 9/11).

Doesn't matter though, you'll go on yammering about this until hell freezes over. I'm just waiting for the "melting point of steel" claim to drop, among other tired old and completely discredited troofer canards.


More useless banter just to say absolutely nothing. You used Google well though, I'll give you that. You ate your own words because of it getting into something way above your head.

Troofer (LOL)
Comrade Stalin
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
What video evidence stupid? All of the videos do not show Flight 77.


The point is, you don't care whether or not there is clear video evidence. You've already decided beforehand what you want to believe. *Religion*
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
The point is, you don't care whether or not there is clear video evidence. You've already decided beforehand what you want to believe. *Religion*


Apparently you and your like don't like conclusive proof. Can you look at any of the Pentagon videos released by the government and confirm that was Flight 77?

Excuses are like s and you are definitely an . Maybe you should go back to let Popular Science re-write history for you.

Comrade Stalin
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Are you denying Rex 84 did not happen? If you are you sound like a ing idiot who knows about the very country you live in.


Where did I deny it? No where. See, this is a classic example of where you twist the truth to suite your preconceived ideological world view. Rex 84 certainly exists, so what? The only thing to come out of this FEMA concentration camp stuff is flat out lies (i.e. photo-shopped satellite pictures of a North Korean prison camp and calling that a FEMA concentration camp). And to think Rex 84 was a part of some NWO plot to turn America into a fascist state, is just loony, and again, falsification of the truth.

quote:
What part of camps being operated by FEMA don't you quite understand if martial law is implemented?


Martial law isn't being implemented, so could you please, just shut the up about it? Are you seriously that paranoid?
Comrade Stalin
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Apparently you and your like don't like conclusive proof. Can you look at any of the Pentagon videos released by the government and confirm that was Flight 77?


A video is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to conclusive proof. I'm sorry that in your world, something is true only if it's been recorded and uploaded to youtube. :stongue:

quote:
Excuses are like s and you are definitely an . Maybe you should go back to let Popular Science re-write history for you.


That's cute. Why don't you get an education? Oh, I forgot, educated people are just being brainwashed for the coming fascist dictatorship. My bad. :haha:
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 
Privacy Statement