|
The Arrivals: The Foundation of the Anti-Christ (pg. 51)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
i've already explained that to you, simpleton. the fact you think all those votes are from aussies just shows how useless you are at research. i happened to check that poll well before you'd heard of it, and saw what happened after it was posted on 911blogger et al.
it really is like talking to a child :stongue: |
Are you ing stupid or what? (never mind don't answer that)
Did you bother reading the local newspaper it originated from before it went international. This was coming straight out of Australia and he has at least 50% of the "community" on his side.
He's calling out the official story, local media and ing idiots like you. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
somebody's reading comprehension is obviously a little behind, lol. i've already addressed your BS on this topic you ing moron.
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
i was surprised that a leading trade member leader was also a congenital idiot, but they come in all shapes and sizes.
FYI, the poll had a reasonable (though not total) favour against bracken's nonsense, before it was posted on 911blogger and others, and all the idiots like you went along and voted.
in any case, scientific truth and facts are not decided upon by internet poll. but i guess, without any peer-reviewed science, this is all you idiots can do. well done, you won another poll! how's that second investigation coming along? :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: |
again, i don't care what random internet users, a huge majority of whom are not australian, have to say about 911 and what some union leader has to say :haha: |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
wrong! thanks for playing. i said i had read a "few" dozen pages. that isn't necessarily 24. you're completely incapable of understanding anything you read :haha:
i do enjoy your infatuation with me, knock yourself out.
|
A few dozen pages is 24- 48 pages, the 9/11 Commission Report is a 600 page book of lies and omissions. You barely made past the first chapter you ing idiot. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
A few dozen pages is 24- 48 pages, the 9/11 Commission Report is a 600 page book of lies and omissions. You barely made past the first chapter you ing idiot. |
a "few" can mean many things, retard. and no, i made it well past the first chapter. it was a "few" dozen pages from all over the report (ie the interesting bits).
you are incapable of making reasonable inferences from information provided. which is why you're a conspiracy theorist.
i am laughing my arse off at you (supposedly) reading the whole report, and STILL not understanding it. how embarrassing :haha: :haha: :haha: |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
I'm surprised you still have time to troll but yet don't have the time to check or admit that thousands of verified engineers say otherwise.
What are you afraid of? |
taking 15 seconds to call you a dolt = entertainment during my coffee break
as for your expectation of me systematically proving your so called list of experts to be grossly overrated and generally full of , thats the equivalent of you telling me a bag of sand is in reality full of diamonds and expecting me to analyze every single grain to prove you wrong....
In my opinion, any self respecting organization who purports its members to be experts in their fields that doesn't properly vet and background check its own members is a complete and utter joke.
For example, and i know how much you hate the word credential since you have none, but engineering licensing associations vet every single candidate who applies for membership before granting them a license and listing them in their registry... How hard would it have been for architects and engineers for 9/11 truth to vet its membership before posting its "list"? well it would have made the list awfully short which is probably why they skipped that step.
Christ, your truth movement couldn't even put together a theory that would pass basic academic research standards. You rarely if ever linik to the entire transcript of quotes you use from key figures (mainly because they are almost always taken way out of context), you don't cite, read or use any peer reviewed scientific analysis, and the list goes on....
how can you expect to have anyone take your ideas seriously if you cant even present your opinions in a academic manner? A properly researched paper would exclude all evidence that would be considered to be hearsay, conjecture or coincidence. |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Are you ing stupid or what? (never mind don't answer that)
Did you bother reading the local newspaper it originated from before it went international. This was coming straight out of Australia and he has at least 50% of the "community" on his side.
He's calling out the official story, local media and ing idiots like you. |
Yeah i didn't need to look far to see that your references are people who believe in planet towing alien spaceships in our vicinity. I'm pretty sure that if i waste even more of my time delving into your "sources" i will come up with holograms and missiles.
Why don't you save me the effort and post them yourself. |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
somebody's reading comprehension is obviously a little behind, lol. i've already addressed your BS on this topic you ing moron.
again, i don't care what random internet users, a huge majority of whom are not australian, have to say about 911 and what some union leader has to say :haha: |
So copying and pasting a bulletin list from a random internet user named Donna Ferrente (LOL) over a legitimate person who just made world headlines originating in Australia because he called out the media is?
Got you, thanks for clearing that up. |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| Hey Mark, I tried. Logic and analogies don't work. I think he may have failed kindergarten. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by colonelcrisp
taking 15 seconds to call you a dolt = entertainment during my coffee break
as for your expectation of me systematically proving your so called list of experts to be grossly overrated and generally full of , thats the equivalent of you telling me a bag of sand is in reality full of diamonds and expecting me to analyze every single grain to prove you wrong....
In my opinion, any self respecting organization who purports its members to be experts in their fields that doesn't properly vet and background check its own members is a complete and utter joke.
For example, and i know how much you hate the word credential since you have none, but engineering licensing associations vet every single candidate who applies for membership before granting them a license and listing them in their registry... How hard would it have been for architects and engineers for 9/11 truth to vet its membership before posting its "list"? well it would have made the list awfully short which is probably why they skipped that step.
Christ, your truth movement couldn't even put together a theory that would pass basic academic research standards. You rarely if ever linik to the entire transcript of quotes you use from key figures (mainly because they are almost always taken way out of context), you don't cite, read or use any peer reviewed scientific analysis, and the list goes on....
how can you expect to have anyone take your ideas seriously if you cant even present your opinions in a academic manner? A properly researched paper would exclude all evidence that would be considered to be hearsay, conjecture or coincidence. |
yep! :haha:
http://lies-of-the-truth-movement.b...-engineers.html |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
Hey Mark, I tried. Logic and analogies don't work. I think he may have failed kindergarten. |
you should ask del to write a finger painting script for TA so we can communicate on curlout's level.... |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by colonelcrisp
taking 15 seconds to call you a dolt = entertainment during my coffee break
as for your expectation of me systematically proving your so called list of experts to be grossly overrated and generally full of , thats the equivalent of you telling me a bag of sand is in reality full of diamonds and expecting me to analyze every single grain to prove you wrong....
In my opinion, any self respecting organization who purports its members to be experts in their fields that doesn't properly vet and background check its own members is a complete and utter joke.
For example, and i know how much you hate the word credential since you have none, but engineering licensing associations vet every single candidate who applies for membership before granting them a license and listing them in their registry... How hard would it have been for architects and engineers for 9/11 truth to vet its membership before posting its "list"? well it would have made the list awfully short which is probably why they skipped that step.
Christ, your truth movement couldn't even put together a theory that would pass basic academic research standards. You rarely if ever linik to the entire transcript of quotes you use from key figures (mainly because they are almost always taken way out of context), you don't cite, read or use any peer reviewed scientific analysis, and the list goes on....
how can you expect to have anyone take your ideas seriously if you cant even present your opinions in a academic manner? A properly researched paper would exclude all evidence that would be considered to be hearsay, conjecture or coincidence. |
That's a whole lot of writing to say absolutely nothing. Check that list yet?
http://www2.ae911truth.org/signpetition.php |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
So copying and pasting a bulletin list from a random internet user named Donna Ferrente (LOL) |
it's "Ferentes" you illiterate .
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
over a legitimate person who just made world headlines originating in Australia because he called out the media is? |
:haha: :haha: oh my god, you kill me. what makes the leader of a completely small & irrelevant union leader "legitimate"? im rarely one to quote the prime minister, but she's certainly way more legit than some union hack, hahahahaha.
| quote: |
Prime Minister Julia Gillard says comments by a Victorian union official that the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks were a conspiracy are "stupid and wrong". |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Got you, thanks for clearing that up. |
is that it? that's your huge, epic point of destruction? wow, don't give up your day job, meat packer! :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: :stongue: |
|
|
|
|
