|
The Arrivals: The Foundation of the Anti-Christ (pg. 61)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
You seem to have a lot of time making excuses when the probability of 3 separate instances occurring on the same day is next to impossible when it has never happened in the history of mankind before or after 9/11. |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
could you please show me the other times in history that large commercial jets full of fuel were flown at 500mph into skyscrapers that were built using the 'tube in a tube' structural design?
since you keep harping on the "never before in history" (and have been for years), i'd like to see the examples the other times in history when these things happened and the skyscrapers didn't fall down.
you've tried the B-25 incident, i owned you hard on that, what are your other examples? |
3. Inability to answer questions.
For people who loudly advertise their determination to the principle of questioning everything, they're pretty poor at answering direct questions from sceptics about the claims that they make.
tick tock motherer. |
|
|
| basilisk |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
That's wonderful, the problem with your brief analysis is that WTC 1 and WTC 2 were two completely separate instances. Each plane crashed into different locations of the towers yet both buildings blew up and fell to the ground at nearly the rate of free fall. Then you have WTC 7 which blew up and collapsed to the ground at nearly the rate of free fall as well without having any plane crash into it. |
Facts are your enemy.
| quote: | In a video, it appears that WTC 7 is descending in free fall, something that would not occur in the structural collapse that you describe. How can you ignore basic laws of physics?
In the draft WTC 7 report (released Aug. 21, 2008; available at http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NIST_NCST...lic_comment.pdf), NIST stated that the north face of the building descended 18 stories (the portion of the collapse visible in the video) in 5.4 seconds, based on video analysis of the building collapse. This time period is 40 percent longer than the 3.9 seconds this process would have taken if the north face of the building had descended solely under free fall conditions. During the public comment period on the draft report, NIST was asked to confirm this time difference and define the reasons for it in greater detail.
To further clarify the descent of the north face, NIST recorded the downward displacement of a point near the center of the roofline from first movement until the north face was no longer visible in the video. Numerical analyses were conducted to calculate the velocity and acceleration of the roofline point from the time-dependent displacement data. The instant at which vertical motion of the roofline first occurred was determined by tracking the numerical value of the brightness of a pixel (a single element in the video image) at the roofline. This pixel became brighter as the roofline began to descend because the color of the pixel started to change from that of the building façade to the lighter color of the sky.
The approach taken by NIST is summarized in Section 3.6 of the final summary report, NCSTAR 1A (released Nov. 20, 2008; available at http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A.pdf) and detailed in Section 12.5.3 of NIST NCSTAR 1-9 (available at http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCS...9%20Vol%202.pdf).
The analyses of the video (both the estimation of the instant the roofline began to descend and the calculated velocity and acceleration of a point on the roofline) revealed three distinct stages characterizing the 5.4 seconds of collapse:
* Stage 1 (0 to 1.75 seconds): acceleration less than that of gravity (i.e., slower than free fall).
* Stage 2 (1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)
* Stage 3 (4.0 to 5.4 seconds): decreased acceleration, again less than that of gravity
This analysis showed that the 40 percent longer descent time—compared to the 3.9 second free fall time—was due primarily to Stage 1, which corresponded to the buckling of the exterior columns in the lower stories of the north face. During Stage 2, the north face descended essentially in free fall, indicating negligible support from the structure below. This is consistent with the structural analysis model which showed the exterior columns buckling and losing their capacity to support the loads from the structure above. In Stage 3, the acceleration decreased as the upper portion of the north face encountered increased resistance from the collapsed structure and the debris pile below. |
Nevermind that freefall is not a distinguishing characteristic of controlled demolition... but hey, we're arguing with true believers here. |
|
|
| Claude Hughes |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
he's a meat packer. no, that isn't a euphamism for smoking pole, though it could be. |
| quote: | Originally posted by Zyklon_Jay
packers usually take it up the ass, and quite frankly that would wake up his mother and cause him to get grounded. |
This is so unbelievably brutal I'm actually embarrassed for the two of you. Is this really the most creative dis you could come up with? Wow
This is how it's done.....
| quote: | Originally posted by Claude Hughes
Very clever :rolleyes:
Did you plan this while you were in bed eating each others asses or over "private messages"?
It's a fact that 1 of them is correct. Guess what? No matter which one it is you're both very "H*A*P*P*Y" :D
:haha:
 |
BEAUTIFUL! |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
i guess when you have low standards you're constantly able to amuse yourself :stongue:
we're all still waiting or your opinions on 911 claude! |
|
|
| Zyklon_Jay |
what do you do for a living claude?
claude est un nom francais, est-ce que tu parles la belle langue? Moi je pense que tu restes avec ta maman et tu travail au tim hortons.
not that there is anything wrong with that... |
|
|
| Claude Hughes |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
i guess when you have low standards you're constantly able to amuse yourself :stongue:
we're all still waiting or your opinions on 911 claude! |
Let's shift the focus to this....
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
It's time to expose PKC.
PKC has not only been trolling this forum bashing it's members for years lying about everything he speaks of. He is also playing epic fail trolling games with his "secret" friends using alternative/vulgar user handles (who have probably been banned from this forum for trolling). To top it all off a quick search on Google yields more then a few interesting results about the user and mega troll known as PKCraistlin on the the world wide web,
1. PKCraistlin is a member on HateForum.com (LOL). Here are some of his posts,
http://www.hateforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=11327 |
Why don't you share with us this disturbing community you are associated with? |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| sorry to disappoint you claude, i have no idea. ive been a member of squillions of forums, and this was what, 10 years ago? dont even remember posting those quotes cretinrot pasted. then again, i was quite the stoner :) |
|
|
| culorut |
| PKC's mom is so slutty that she gets more claps from the back than an auditorium. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
You seem to have a lot of time making excuses when the probability of 3 separate instances occurring on the same day is next to impossible when it has never happened in the history of mankind before or after 9/11. |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
could you please show me the other times in history that large commercial jets full of fuel were flown at 500mph into skyscrapers that were built using the 'tube in a tube' structural design?
since you keep harping on the "never before in history" (and have been for years), i'd like to see the examples the other times in history when these things happened and the skyscrapers didn't fall down.
you've tried the B-25 incident, i owned you hard on that, what are your other examples? |
3. Inability to answer questions.
For people who loudly advertise their determination to the principle of questioning everything, they're pretty poor at answering direct questions from sceptics about the claims that they make.
tick tock motherer. |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
PKC's mom is so slutty that she gets more claps from the back than an auditorium. |
Really, this is the best you can do? You are a child, aren't you?
oh, and in-case PKC's mom is lurking... Call me:gsmile: |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | | Originally posted by Moral Hazard oh, and in-case PKC's mom is lurking... Call me:gsmile: |
I wouldn't worry, she'll call you. |
|
|
| Claude Hughes |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
sorry to disappoint you claude, i have no idea (of course you have no idea lol). ive been a TROLLING member of squillions of forums, and this was what, 10 years ago? (CORRECTED) dont even remember posting those quotes cretinrot pasted (you've been called out AGAIN and now all of a sudden you have no recollection? How convenient). then again, i was and still am quite the moron and stoner :) (CORRECTED) |
|
|
|
|
|
