|
The Arrivals: The Foundation of the Anti-Christ (pg. 65)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Comrade Stalin |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
It's my religion and I am entitled to it. |
FIXED |
|
|
| culorut |
| Who let the farm animals back in? |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
No, see that's the thing. We as democratic nation-states entrust people with the authority to review evidence and make judgments regarding what is and is not factual... these people are called triers of fact and generally are judges, juries, commissioners, magistrates, etc depending on the forum in which the question of fact is being decided. The "official story" regarding 9/11 has been accepted as fact by a number commissions and courts; meaning, every trier of fact entrusted to determine what happened has reviewed evidence and determined that the "official story" is factually correct (on a balance of probabilities... that's the test). So, you see, it's not my opinion; it's the judgment of numerous judges on numerous courts, and commisioners on the 911 commission; and since those persons are the ones that are charged with the responsibility of establishing fact it is not opinion at all; rather, it is fact. In order for it to no longer be fact someone will have to prove to another trier of fact that it is incorrect. So, my poorly educated and terribly misinformed friend... your position is "just your opinion"; however, the position of the 9/11 commission and the judges/juries that heard the civil court cases for the insurance claims are FACT (by definition). |
All that just to say you take side with the Bush administration? |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
All that just to say you take side with the Bush administration? |
No; all of that just to explain that fact is dertermined by certain individuals whom we entrust with that duty... of whom you are not one; subsequently, the "official story" is FACT, not opinion.
I may point out; however, that it is more correct to state that the Bush administration agreed with the commission and later the judges rather then vice versa, as the Bush administrations initial position was not identical to that which they took following the commission's report. |
|
|
| Comrade Stalin |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
All that just to say you take side with the Bush administration? |
Uh, you know, liberals and conservatives accept the peer-reviewed investigation by NIST as fact. You ing tool. |
|
|
| PivotTechno |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Who let the farm animals back in? |
Right, because the very fabric of society might unravel if your highbrow discussion should happen to be interrupted.
Or is it that when you've finally reached your amazingly and utterly mindblowing conclusion to your highbrow discussion that the very fabric of society will indeed unravel, just as you'd planned from the beginning?
People viewing this thread:
You:
 |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by PivotTechno
Right, because the very fabric of society might unravel if your highbrow discussion should happen to be interrupted.
Or is it that when you've finally reached your amazingly and utterly mindblowing conclusion to your highbrow discussion that the very fabric of society will indeed unravel, just as you'd planned from the beginning?
People viewing this thread:
You:
|
Completely miss the point much?
I entered this discussion to point out the individuals trolling on other users here. Feel free to go back and check. |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
Uh, you know, liberals and conservatives accept the peer-reviewed investigation by NIST as fact. You ing tool. |
And the other half of the planet does not accept it Mr. Potato Head.
I guess you still think there is a difference between liberals and conservatives, just like you think you have choice. |
|
|
| Claude Hughes |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
No, see that's the thing. We as democratic nation-states entrust people with the authority to review evidence and make judgments regarding what is and is not factual... these people are called triers of fact and generally are judges, juries, commissioners, magistrates, etc depending on the forum in which the question of fact is being decided. The "official story" regarding 9/11 has been accepted as fact by a number commissions and courts; meaning, every trier of fact entrusted to determine what happened has reviewed evidence and determined that the "official story" is factually correct (on a balance of probabilities... that's the test). So, you see, it's not my opinion; it's the judgment of numerous judges on numerous courts, and commisioners on the 911 commission; and since those persons are the ones that are charged with the responsibility of establishing fact it is not opinion at all; rather, it is fact. In order for it to no longer be fact someone will have to prove to another trier of fact that it is incorrect. So, my poorly educated and terribly misinformed friend... your position is "just your opinion"; however, the position of the 9/11 commission and the judges/juries that heard the civil court cases for the insurance claims are FACT (by definition). |
 |
|
|
| PivotTechno |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Completely miss the point much?
I entered this discussion to point out the individuals trolling on other users here. Feel free to go back and check. |
I'm far more curious about how you'll be leaving it. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
I entered this discussion to point out the individuals trolling on other users here. Feel free to go back and check. |
Doesn't look like trolling to me. You're getting owned, yes - but that doesn't mean you're being trolled. |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| at least ******** was entertaining.... |
|
|
|
|
