Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN 3. Inability to answer questions.
For people who loudly advertise their determination to the principle of questioning everything, they're pretty poor at answering direct questions from sceptics about the claims that they make.
Go away epic troll
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by Claude Hughes
Go away epic troll
apart from gobbling on cretinrot's knob, what exactly has been your "non-troll" contribution to this thread, simpleton?
Claude Hughes
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
It's not me at all, it's their ignorance which destroys them. I'm still getting a good laugh about how many of them actually think some guy named "CatHerder" from abovetopsecret.com (LOL) actually has a say in all this using pre-school hand drawn evidence. CatHerder must be PKC's secret persona as that website is just about the only place where he might actually get someone to listen to him and all his bull excuses.
quote:
Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
Funny, coming from the guy who believes FEMA is setting up concentration camps.
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
It's even funnier that you ignore the fact that there is over 800 camps all guarded and empty in the USA yet you believe they are only there for the soul purpose of just taking up space.
If you believe that they all were set up to imprison only illegal Mexicans you're a ing tool also. Rex 84, reported since 1987 because of the Iran/Contra hearings.
Newsflash.
Keep ignoring history,
:haha:
Claude Hughes
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
apart from gobbling on cretinrot's knob, what exactly has been your "non-troll" contribution to this thread, simpleton?
Let me remind you what brought me here in the first place, your dumb ass. I'm enjoying culorut destroy the bush jr administration sort of like how he destroyed you in this thread. Now leave me alone you disease.
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
apart from gobbling on cretinrot's knob, what exactly has been your "non-troll" contribution to this thread, simpleton?
I bet you're the kind of guy that would a person in the ass and not even have the goddamn common courtesy to give him a reach-around.
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by Claude Hughes
Let me remind you what brought me here in the first place, your dumb ass.
so what you're saying is you came here for much the same reason i did- dumb asses. so in essence, you've behaved virtually the same way i have (except thoroughly hypocritically, what with your "respect" bull) and still think you're somehow different? hahahaha.
quote:
Originally posted by Claude Hughes
I'm enjoying culorut destroy the bush jr administration sort of like how he destroyed you in this thread.
:stongue: i wouldn't expect an intellectual peasant to draw any other conclusion;
6. Inability to tell good evidence from bad.
Conspiracy theorists have no place for peer-review, for scientific knowledge, for the respectability of sources. The fact that a claim has been made by anybody, anywhere, is enough for them to reproduce it and demand that the questions it raises be answered, as if intellectual enquiry were a matter of responding to every rumour. While they do this, of course, they will claim to have "open minds" and abuse the sceptics for apparently lacking same.
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
6. Inability to tell good evidence from bad.
Conspiracy theorists have no place for peer-review, for scientific knowledge, for the respectability of sources. The fact that a claim has been made by anybody, anywhere, is enough for them to reproduce it and demand that the questions it raises be answered, as if intellectual enquiry were a matter of responding to every rumour. While they do this, of course, they will claim to have "open minds" and abuse the sceptics for apparently lacking same.
Was waiting for your useless list to be brought up again, care to explain how "CatHerder" from abovetopsecret.com is good evidence when placed up against thousands of verified engineers, pilots, 9/11 Commission board members and the like?
culorut
So PKC were you born a fat, slimy, scumbag puke piece of troll or did you have to work on it?
culorut
Was "CatHerder's" (LOL) write up peer reviewed?
:stongue:
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Was waiting for your useless list to be brought up again, care to explain how "CatHerder" from abovetopsecret.com is good evidence when placed up against thousands of verified engineers, pilots, 9/11 Commission board members and the like?
i never referenced catherder. but i HAVE been asking you for 3 years what happened to flight 77, how the crew and passengers got to the pentagon crash site, what did the hundreds if not thousands of witnesses REALLY see if not the UA jet etc etc etc.
i gave you more than enough opportunities, and to this day you have been unwilling or unable to answer these very basic questions.
i already destroyed your assertion that some of the 911 commissioners think the commission was a failure (or that it was an inside job, ROFL).
quote:
Lee Hamilton, along with Thomas Keane:
quote:
Both of us were aware of grumbling around Washington that the 9/11 Commission was doomed--if not designed--to fail: the commission would splinter down partisan lines; lose its credibility by leaking classified information; be denied the necessary access to do its job; or alienate the 9/11 families who had fought on behalf of its creation. What we could not have anticipated were the remarkable people and circumstances that would coalesce within and around the 9/11 Commission over the coming twenty months to enable our success.
... [NORAD] gave us inaccurate information. We asked for a lot of material and a lot of documentation. They did not supply it all. They gave us a few things. We sent some staff into their headquarters. We identified a lot more documents and tapes, they eventually gave them to us, we had to issue a subpoena to get them. Eventually they told us we had the story right, they had it wrong, it took a while to get to that point, but we eventually got here.
completely inline with the typical CT MO, you just went on, posting more nonsense.
7. Inability to withdraw.
It's a rare day indeed when a conspiracy theorist admits that a claim they have made has turned out to be without foundation, whether it be the overall claim itself or any of the evidence produced to support it. Moreover they have a liking (see 3. above) for the technique of avoiding discussion of their claims by "swamping" - piling on a whole lot more material rather than respond to the objections sceptics make to the previous lot.
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Was "CatHerder's" (LOL) write up peer reviewed?
why would someone like you care either way? :haha:
you're only interested in "evidence" that confirms your pre-conceived notions. because you're a conspiracy theorist (and uneducated) and that's how CTs roll.
culorut
How do you feel about your fellow Aussies PKC?
65% percent of the people which called in later felt the 9/11 story did not stand up to scientific scrutiny.
Trades Hall president Kevin Bracken stands by his 9/11 conspiracy
VICTORIAN Trades Hall president Kevin Bracken remains unrepentant after his controversial comments about the 9/11 attacks made news around the world. Mr Bracken sparked outrage yesterday when he told Jon Faine's ABC talk-back program the attacks were not the result of terrorist activity. He said the story was a conspiracy that "didn't stand up" to scientific scrutiny. This morning Mr Bracken phoned into Faine's program again for a right of reply. He said he wasn't phoning as the president of the Trades Hall council or as secretary of the Maritime Union of Australia. Mr Bracken stood by his comments and said he had the support of 50 per cent of the community. He also attacked Faine, claiming he was ridiculed on yesterday's program.
"Unfortunately cowards like yourself have set the political agenda in this country for too long," said Kevin Bracken.
