Originally posted by culorut
Actually people like you are talking a lot of nonsense. Missiles and holograms? Care to quote me stating any of this or are you going to keep making stuff up and painting pictures of the ocean with black paint.
FYI, Al-Qaeda was a direct result of US involvement (black-ops) dating back a few decades. This is known fact and on the record.
Nonsense? I'm just trying to fill in the blanks because you haven't provided any straight answers in your own words. Here are those simple questions again:
1) What was rigged for controlled demolition on 9/11: WTC 7, the twin towers, the Pentagon, or other structures?
2) How were the planes hijacked and by whom? (I've seen some allusions to Al-Qaeda being made up so I am curious to know who was responsible: US government operatives or what?)
3) Did a plane hit the Pentagon or was it something else?
All I know is that you think WTC 7 was brought down by CD but you still haven't explained the others. Now you're saying Al-Qaeda exists but you have not clarified what you believe their present relationship to the US government might be. As for the Pentagon, who the knows? You haven't been clear and no one knows where you really stand. If it's somehow obvious and I've missed it then surely it isn't much to ask for you to clarify your position on 9/11 - if indeed you have one and aren't just throwing out a lot of random crap in the hope that something sticks.
DaRoZa
colorut: if double agents/black ops/CIA are behind all the attacks attributed to al queda, and you don't buy into the missile/hologram thing, what exactly did they do to convince atta et. al. to partake in suicide attacks?
so what if some of them were trained by CIA in afghanastan decades ago. doesn't mean that that led to all of their actions in the future. nicaraguan contras and tons of militia around the world were influenced by the US in one way or another over the last century, but doesn't mean you can automatically attribute every action they take thereafter to the US.
thesauce23
quote:
Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
Search my earliest posts from 2009 and you'll see.
yea i searched the first 2 pages and couldn't find the answer.
quote:
Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
I'd much rather have my taxes go towards health care than bombing the out of third world countries. No more paying insurance premiums to corrupt insurance companies.
but this= win. atleast this post shows signs that you are not really a jaded tard like alot of patriotic-ragin americans(when it comes to healthcare atleast).
Spam
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Do you see a plane cause I don't. The government released only 5 frames of their supposed video evidence and manipulated the video. They said a plane hit the pentagon, where's the proof?
Given the time lapse between frames, I'm more than convinced that the object we see in the background at 24 seconds could be a plane.
There are also hundreds of eye-witnesses that said they saw a plane crash into the pentagon. This is consistent with the fact that the plane would have flown over a major highway junction to make it to the pentagon.
Euphorica
that video is a joke
Spam
quote:
Originally posted by Euphorica
that video is a joke
It is what it is, grainy security footage that shows a large, white object crash into the pentagon.
Comrade Stalin
quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
:stongue: psst, Krypton... "Forensic" actually means "acceptable to a court." I'm not trying to be a prick here, just thought I'd clear that up. I presume you mean physical evidence or evidence that has been tested by experts and accepted into court.
No no, it's ok. Because these idiots don't even have that kind of evidence. I've been asking for years for one court case to put the supposed traitors in prison. I've challenged them to bring a court case. They'd probably make millions of dollars if they did. But course, we all know they can't, and won't because they can't, and never will.
Comrade Stalin
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Do you see a plane cause I don't. The government released only 5 frames of their supposed video evidence and manipulated the video. They said a plane hit the pentagon, where's the proof?
How many murders have been seen? I guess a murderer can't be found guilty unless we have a youtube video clearly showing it, right? Oh, what about the planes we actually did see hit a building? Two buildings. Those are faked right? Remote controlled airplanes or something huh? Suicidal CIA agents labeled Al-Qaeda to make them look like terrorists? :stongue:
quote:
And no I could care less about pieces of scrap metal that were supposedly found on the lawn, none of it has ever been matched up to Flight 77.
So you just decided, out of hand, to completely dismiss the airplane debris found all over the Pentagon wreckage. And how are you going to explain that? A fairy sprinkling the Pentagon lawn with metal airplane debris? :haha: :haha: :haha:
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by Euphorica
that video is a joke
There is footage of not one but three buildings blowing up right in front of everyone's eyes, they later said it was the fires yet this enigma has never happened in the history of mankind. Only on 9/11.
There is footage of something smashing into the Pentagon yet the video they provided shows all, to date there is no conclusive evidence that was ever matched to Flight 77. Only on 9/11.
There is footage of Flight 93 after the crash showing nothing but a huge ing hole in the ground (shot down) with yet again no conclusive evidence. Only on 9/11.
Jokes is about right.
love_child
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
There is footage of not one but three buildings blowing up right in front of everyone's eyes, they later said it was the fires yet this enigma has never happened in the history of mankind. Only on 9/11.
There is footage of something smashing into the Pentagon yet the video they provided shows all, to date there is no conclusive evidence that was ever matched to Flight 77. Only on 9/11.
There is footage of Flight 93 after the crash showing nothing but a huge ing hole in the ground (shot down) with yet again no conclusive evidence. Only on 9/11.
Jokes is about right.
It is pretty funny that we have tons of amateur footage of the planes going into the towers but not one single (clear) video of the plane hitting the pentagon.
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by love_child
It is pretty funny that we have tons of amateur footage of the planes going into the towers but not one single (clear) video of the plane hitting the pentagon.
The footage and tons more of it is definitely available and should have been made available a long time ago. It's the Pentagon, every last square inch inside and out has been monitored 24/7 for at least 50 years. Coincidentally, construction of the Pentagon began on September 11th, 1941.
But yes it is funny that the only released video happens to be the worst possible option to start off with. They went ahead editing it to make matters worse showing only 5 frames with no conclusive evidence that it was Flight 77.
Silky Johnson
Aren't you people bored of arguing the same points over and over again with no progress? Taking a is more productive than what's going on in here.
