|
The Arrivals: The Foundation of the Anti-Christ (pg. 46)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| thesauce23 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
instead of laughing like a prepubescent 6 year old girl who got her first my little pony |
yea instead, one should laugh more like a pubescent 6 y/o |
|
|
| DaRoZa |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
|
so now you're posting that implies you believe no planes flew into the WTC? after you posted all the stuff about the whistleblower who stated they failed to assess atta as a threat.
just quit while you're behind... far behind. |
|
|
| basilisk |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Something else because the experts say so, which I re-quoted for you a couple of posts above to drive it home. |
"Something else"? That's your big ing theory? Nine years after the fact that's what you offer as a coherent alternative to the "official story"? A few quotations suggesting no planes were hijacked with absolutely no other information put forward and, by definition, no evidence whatsoever? What a joke. |
|
|
| Claude Hughes |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
I would hardly call a pre-school write up from a user named "CatHerder" on abovetopsecret.com conclusive. Try taking that to a court room and see how it would hold up if you are really convinced.
Below is the type of stuff that is severely wrong with the garbage CatHerder (LOL) posted as evidence in the link you provided,
Oh really?
So I will ask again, start providing some conclusive evidence by credible people that Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon. I might then start taking you seriously, and no abovetopsecret.com doesn't count. |
:haha:
You are single handedly destroying these guys! |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by Claude Hughes
:haha:
You are single handedly destroying these guys! |
I guess so. John Lear is a very credible source!
| quote: |
John Lear is a well known, even legendary figure in the UFO community... |
oh theres more too. Holograms and missles and oh an alien race towing the moon into orbit! LOL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj-H..._embedded#at=11
36 minutes of his interview.. wowwwwwwwwwwwww
So terrorists could never crash the planes into the world trade center yet its plausible to believe that the moon was towed into orbit by an alien race?
AND your posting this as your first testimonial as per credible evidence?
Keep it comming clowns.. |
|
|
| basilisk |
| quote: | Originally posted by Claude Hughes
:haha:
You are single handedly destroying these guys! |
Conspiracy theorist arbitrarily rejects conspiracy theory web site, offers up more material from other conspiracy theory web sites as definitive proof of "something else" striking the Pentagon without even guessing what that might be, and this is "single handedly destroying" everyone in the discussion using reason and logic to examine the material at hand? Right. |
|
|
| Comrade Stalin |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Something else because the experts say so, which I re-quoted for you a couple of posts above to drive it home. I would hardly call a pre-school write up from a user named "CatHerder" on abovetopsecret.com conclusive. Try taking that to a court room and see how it would hold up if you are really convinced. |
You are invoking a court room? LOL. Seriously? Your standard of truth isn't fit for a North Korean court room. The day you and your "movement" truly uncover this supposed plot and get everyone arrested and convicted for treason, murder, terrorism, then I'll believe you. Until then, ty documentaries, youtube videos, and so-called expert testimony (of which these "experts" never even examined the physical evidence first-hand) isn't going to cut it.
| quote: | | So I will ask again, start providing some conclusive evidence by credible people that Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon. I might then start taking you seriously, and no abovetopsecret.com doesn't count. |
Why are you asking for conclusive evidence (which is there but since it's from the government you don't believe it) when you yourself have no conclusive evidence of your own?:haha: |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by basilisk
"Something else"? That's your big ing theory? Nine years after the fact that's what you offer as a coherent alternative to the "official story"? A few quotations suggesting no planes were hijacked with absolutely no other information put forward and, by definition, no evidence whatsoever? What a joke. |
i've been asking ~3 years now for him to tell me what happened to flight 77 if it didn't crash into the pentagon, how the remains of passengers and crew known to be on flight 77 got to the pentagon crash site etc etc, and he's never been able to provide anything close to an answer. just ignorant appeals to authority to people who aren't actually authorities at all, haha.
indeed, i have yet to see a proper, coherent theory for how the impossibly vast and unlikely conspiracy was meant to be carried out. 9 years and none of the retards cretinrot follows have been able to do so, which explains why cretinrot can't either, because he is incapable of novel, independent thought. everything he "knows" about the world can be found on youtube. school too hard, youtube good. |
|
|
| richard raiban |
| quote: | Originally posted by basilisk
That's all we can really do about most aspects of 9/11. |
This is exactly my point. We are left to "speculate" about what happened. All the evidence we have doesn't add up. Everyone here is in agreement that the "official report" is a tad askew. We all know and I think have admitted that the Bush Administration dropped the ball on this big time (I believe there was a hidden agenda for "dropping the ball" others here believe that they were just "negligent"). That makes them just as liable and shouldn't exempt them from taking ownership for their actions and what went down (no pun). All of you guys are trying to prove points about CD and other areas. We can go about this until we are all blue in the face. Everyone has their own mixed reviews on this because the truth hasn't been told to us. We shouldn't be getting mad at each other we should be angry at those in power for not giving us the real story. So when people have views that don't match your level of standard that doesn't give you a right to squash their beliefs because you yourself do not hold the final answer, your views are speculations all the same.
Does this make sense to anyone? Do you understand why we CANNOT all agree with each others views? If someone here said that pigs can fly then its fair that we all jump on that person and say they are crazy lol but what we are talking about is far different. |
|
|
| evil_cookie |
| quote: | Originally posted by richard raiban
Does this make sense to anyone? |
NO. |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| Credible reports for cultrot are testimonials from someone who believes that the moon was towed into earths orbit by an alien race who created a massive spaceship. |
|
|
| Comrade Stalin |
| quote: | Originally posted by richard raiban
This is exactly my point. We are left to "speculate" about what happened. All the evidence we have doesn't add up. Everyone here is in agreement that the "official report" is a tad askew. We all know and I think have admitted that the Bush Administration dropped the ball on this big time (I believe there was a hidden agenda for "dropping the ball" others here believe that they were just "negligent"). That makes them just as liable and shouldn't exempt them from taking ownership for their actions and what went down (no pun). All of you guys are trying to prove points about CD and other areas. We can go about this until we are all blue in the face. Everyone has their own mixed reviews on this because the truth hasn't been told to us. We shouldn't be getting mad at each other we should be angry at those in power for not giving us the real story. So when people have views that don't match your level of standard that doesn't give you a right to squash their beliefs because you yourself do not hold the final answer, your views are speculations all the same.
Does this make sense to anyone? Do you understand why we CANNOT all agree with each others views? If someone here said that pigs can fly then its fair that we all jump on that person and say they are crazy lol but what we are talking about is far different. |
This debate is like evolution versus creationism. Evolution isn't complete but it's the best thing we have. Just because it isn't complete doesn't make it invalid. Creationism is just bat crazy. |
|
|
|
|
