|
The Arrivals: The Foundation of the Anti-Christ (pg. 36)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Claude Hughes |
| quote: | Originally posted by love_child
:stongue: at you guys comparing credentials over 9/11 |
|
|
|
| Comrade Stalin |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
I challenge you to use the search function quoting me posting these made up excuses and I will believe you. Until you do so and prove it you should shut the up. |
I did you stupid . I quoted you word for word.
| quote: | In the other 9/11 thread, he says, "The US government needed 9/11 to happen and did nothing to stop it as evidenced by the very specific multiple warnings from other countries."
http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...2&pagenumber=22
But our resident village idiot also believes the US government was behind the attacks, blew up the buildings, and covered it up. So in essence, the US government ignored "very specific multiple warnings from other countries", but since according to him, the US government carried out 9/11, the US government ignored intelligence warnings about themselves. What a ing idiot. |
|
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
I did you stupid . I quoted you word for word. |
You're clearly confused as always. |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
sorry but it's funny that this guy claims to know more about engineering then an engineer, that's all. |
Quote me, otherwise you are full of . |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Quote me, otherwise you are full of . |
|
|
|
| basilisk |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
You continue to neglect that a building which was bigger then WTC building 7 was demolished by controlled demolition even though it was actually done as you originally posted. The Hudson building was much bigger then WTC building 7, more then 5 NFL football fields bigger.
I find it extraordinary that you believe this is impossible when it has been done on a much larger scale yet you don't find it even more extraordinary that not one building in the history of mankind has fallen due to fires before or after 9/11. |
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You have nothing whatsoever, not even a complete theory. I've been trying to illustrate what sort of success criteria you'd need to even begin talking about the controlled demolition of WTC 7 as an alternate theory. It only begins with a comparison such as the one I made to the JL Hudson building. You need to do a lot of legwork after the fact to establish plausibility and rationale. The mere fact that something is possible does not make it so; you have not gathered anything resembling the necessary and sufficient evidence to prove your claim. It isn't a matter of me proving your theory "impossible"; the burden of proof rests with you since you are making the extraordinary claim. It is not true until you have proven it to be true.
And that's the last lesson in basic logic and rational argumentation that I will be providing you since I appear to have grossly overestimated your intelligence and interest in actually having anyone else believe your bat insane world-view. |
|
|
| thesauce23 |
| quote: | Originally posted by basilisk
promulgating |
such a great word. should be used more often |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by basilisk
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You have nothing whatsoever, not even a complete theory. I've been trying to illustrate what sort of success criteria you'd need to even begin talking about the controlled demolition of WTC 7 as an alternate theory. It only begins with a comparison such as the one I made to the JL Hudson building. You need to do a lot of legwork after the fact to establish plausibility and rationale. The mere fact that something is possible does not make it so; you have not gathered anything resembling the necessary and sufficient evidence to prove your claim. It isn't a matter of me proving your theory "impossible"; the burden of proof rests with you since you are making the extraordinary claim. It is not true until you have proven it to be true.
And that's the last lesson in basic logic and rational argumentation that I will be providing you since I appear to have grossly overestimated your intelligence and interest in actually having anyone else believe your bat insane world-view. |
Oh wise teacher do tell, just do me a favor and at least get the basics straight next time you're trying to formulate an argument. I won't mistaken you for someone who I thought had any credibility before ing up the simplest of equations.
:rolleyes: |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Oh wise teacher do tell, just do me a favor and at least get the basics straight next time you're trying to formulate an argument. I won't mistaken you for someone who I thought had any credibility before ing up the simplest of equations.
:rolleyes: |
Did you even graduate from elementary school?
I mean seriously. The guy structured an entire argument for you to fill in the pieces, then you nitpick on him for something so insignificant while he was trying to give you a case. You had absolutely nothing before, and he tried to help you out and you barked on him. You still have nothing now.
Since you have a very basic understanding of vocabulary let me spell it out for you by example:
You are falling off a cliff, he throws you down a rope, you take the rope and pull it out of his hands and end up falling down the cliff.
But unfortunately, here you're still alive to continue your useless, baseless arguments.
I'm at a loss of words for how much of a complete imbecile you are. Cretin is definitely to high of a tier to classify you under, you should at least thank PKC for that undeserving title.
In other more kinder words: you need to go back to school to learn and understand how real research is conducted. Perhaps begin by doing a basic book report, I heard Robert much is quite popular these days. |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
Did you even graduate from elementary school? |
No, apparently to mega trolls like PKC and some other idiots anyone who has a different view or opinion is uneducated.
How about you, what's your view? |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
No, apparently to mega trolls like PKC and some other idiots anyone who has a different view or opinion is uneducated.
How about you, what's your view? |
If anyone is trolling its you. You keep on bringing up arguments with no facts behind them.
You would not be ridiculed if you did the following:
A) bring a solid theory or case to the table
B) have substantial supporting evidence to defend it. Scientifically based (<---- this is important!)
C) refrain from using ad hominem attacks if you are wrong, just admit it. Its ok to be wrong.
IF you keep on bantering useless things like "A MISSLE HIT THE PENTAGON AND THEY DROPPED AIRPLANE DEBRIS AT THE SITE WHILE THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE SIMULTANEOUSLY BLINKED FOR A SECOND" without evidence or things along those lines, expect to be ridiculed since you are wasting the time of anyone who wants to have a meaningful discussion (if there is even one to be had in the first place). |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
No, apparently to mega trolls like PKC and some other idiots anyone who has a different view or opinion is uneducated.
How about you, what's your view? |
Also an educated opinion requires educational backing. Hence why i suggest you go back to school and learn how to write a research paper.
This is a serious suggestion. |
|
|
|
|
