|
Pictures of your Home studio (pg. 237)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| atxbigballer1 |
Who the hell is this guy? But nice studio! :) |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
| not sure but he should read up on room acoustics as that sort of treatment won't do a ing thing except make things worse. |
|
|
| clay |
| quote: | Originally posted by atxbigballer1
Who the hell is this guy? But nice studio! :) |
it says pretty clearly; Markus Schulz. |
|
|
| chris marsh |
[QUOTE]Originally posted by evo8
some additions - GAS is strong at the moment :p
How do you find the Q? i fancy one of those! :) |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
| I have one a blofeld which is sort of the Q+ some stuff and largo the software that is pretty much the blofeld. Largo sounds better than the hardware version. |
|
|
| evo8 |
had a blofeld but got rid of it, just found it waaaay to tedious to program
Q is much better in that department, really nice sound as well, probably too much overlap between it and the virus - i didnt expect to get the both of them at the same time but they are there now! |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
i found the Q much more raw and a little more round. The fx were also different. The Q does have that sort of distortion when just playing one osc. saw 3 notes spread apart, you start to get those non linearities and oscillations that sound great.
largo is just so much easier to mix. |
|
|
| evo8 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
i found the Q much more raw and a little more round. The fx were also different. The Q does have that sort of distortion when just playing one osc. saw 3 notes spread apart, you start to get those non linearities and oscillations that sound great.
largo is just so much easier to mix. |
I just find it much more enjoyable with hardware, i get sick of using the mouse all the time, its nice sometimes to sit there and program some sounds, i just find i come up with sounds i wouldnt come up with on softsynths, i just end up using presets
id say Largo is close enough to the blofeld sound that you wouldnt raelly tell them apart blindfolded |
|
|
| chris marsh |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
i found the Q much more raw and a little more round. The fx were also different. The Q does have that sort of distortion when just playing one osc. saw 3 notes spread apart, you start to get those non linearities and oscillations that sound great.
|
thats exactly the reason i like the pulse so much, although its monophonic of course, but you detune 3 saws by a few semitones, turn up the amp for some analog saturation and already you have an extremely fat, nasty sound:) |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
| ya i regret selling the pulse. What a monster. |
|
|
| MiikkaLeinonen |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
ya i regret selling the pulse. What a monster. |
whats your gear nowadays? You seem to have some history/knowledge about the hardware. |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
practical - all software
experimentation - i like to route synths to other synths in particular the nord G1 and the micromod but this is really when i'm just experimenting.
I find the fx you add can just change the synth completely, the ability to send it to multiple aux doing multiband stuff, sending the signal to the input of another synth like absynth in real time.
I do check kijiji and pick up anything that is nostalgic but it is not really something that gets used for actual practical things.
I find almost al the guys doing real cutting edge sound design are pretty much using 100% software. |
|
|
|
|
