return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 [134] 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 
TranceAddict Investors Club @ Marketocracy (pg. 134)
View this Thread in Original format
Shakka
quote:
Originally posted by jerZ07002
For some reason I thought you worked for a mutual fund.


Sorry--that's fair. We manage one of each. Our mutual fund is long/short, so in essence has several attributes of a hedge fund, except that it is registered with the SEC and publicly traded. Should've clarified better.
jerZ07002
quote:

Our mutual fund is......registered with the SEC.


I have a feeling that distinction won't exist for very long. I think the Obama administration has the public support to pass through more regulation of the hedge fund industry, mostly limiting the amount of leverage a fund could utilize (which I feel would be entirely unnecessary). I could also see regulations requiring hedge funds to cover some of their positions (ironically enough, actually "hedging" their bets). If that's the case, it will take a long time for equities to recover.
Shakka
quote:
Originally posted by jerZ07002
I have a feeling that distinction won't exist for very long. I think the Obama administration has the public support to pass through more regulation of the hedge fund industry, mostly limiting the amount of leverage a fund could utilize (which I feel would be entirely unnecessary). I could also see regulations requiring hedge funds to cover some of their positions (ironically enough, actually "hedging" their bets). If that's the case, it will take a long time for equities to recover.


The problem is a lot of these people simply don't understand how the markets work. It's kind of ironic that after Chris Cox implemented the short-sale ban the 2nd time last September he was later quoted in the Washington Post as saying that his biggest regret/mistake as chairman of the SEC was banning short-sales. The shorts get way too much blame in this whole fiasco. Funny how the SEC is slow to point the finger at the actual companies that invested in piles of . The shorts are certainly less to blame than those who allowed the derivatives market to balloon to $90T or however much it is, and who can use a notional amount of money--say $25M--to cause wild movements in the prices of common equity. Shorts are faaar outnumbered in the market by plain vanilla longs.

In any event, you are probably right about greater transparency and regulation of hedge funds--somewhat sad since many of the hedge funds that get such a bad wrap were the very ones who for years warned about the very problems that allowed them to make billions due to the majority's unwillingness to listen to reason while they were drunk on kool-aid.

/rant

on the leverage issue--it's certainly going to be a problem for a lot of people, but I support some sort of action that will limit the amount of debt that an entity can take on. Our hedge fund uses a maximum of 2:1 leverage while our mutual fund uses no leverage at all (in fact, through a large part of 2008 we were probably about 35-40% in cash, as crappy as cash is).
jerZ07002
quote:
Originally posted by Shakka
The problem is a lot of these people simply don't understand how the markets work. It's kind of ironic that after Chris Cox implemented the short-sale ban the 2nd time last September he was later quoted in the Washington Post as saying that his biggest regret/mistake as chairman of the SEC was banning short-sales. The shorts get way too much blame in this whole fiasco. Funny how the SEC is slow to point the finger at the actual companies that invested in piles of . The shorts are certainly less to blame than those who allowed the derivatives market to balloon to $90T or however much it is, and who can use a notional amount of money--say $25M--to cause wild movements in the prices of common equity. Shorts are faaar outnumbered in the market by plain vanilla longs.


agreed

quote:
Originally posted by Shakka
on the leverage issue--it's certainly going to be a problem for a lot of people, but I support some sort of action that will limit the amount of debt that an entity can take on. Our hedge fund uses a maximum of 2:1 leverage while our mutual fund uses no leverage at all (in fact, through a large part of 2008 we were probably about 35-40% in cash, as crappy as cash is).


I don't support a legal limit on leverage for private firms (that's the responsibility of the lender and the CFO), but I would support tighter thin cap limitations (for tax purposes).
jerZ07002
Does anyone know which ETFs have the most liquid shares for Euro and oil based funds? before doing research, i thought i would ask.
Shakka
quote:
Originally posted by jerZ07002
Does anyone know which ETFs have the most liquid shares for Euro and oil based funds? before doing research, i thought i would ask.


FXE for the Euro. I'm sure it's not the most liquid, but it is plenty liquid.

On oil, did you want to distinguish between U.S. plays vs. int'l plays? XLE is the whole energy complex. USO is a name that some have recommended on this topic in the past, but I have read recently that the fund has grown so large that they are unable to roll over their futures and the fund is woefully underperforming--I wouldn't go after that one.
Krypton
I would personally llike to thank Bernanke for the liquidity infusion.
Capitalizt
Party like it's 2009! (just make sure to skip town before the bill comes due)
jerZ07002
quote:
Originally posted by Shakka
FXE for the Euro. I'm sure it's not the most liquid, but it is plenty liquid.

On oil, did you want to distinguish between U.S. plays vs. int'l plays? XLE is the whole energy complex. USO is a name that some have recommended on this topic in the past, but I have read recently that the fund has grown so large that they are unable to roll over their futures and the fund is woefully underperforming--I wouldn't go after that one.


thanks.

I don't want any international plays. I just want a fund I can sell at any time and also that moves as closely as possible with the underlying commodity.
Joss Weatherby
Man, my wamu stock flew today... :p

Both prefered and common up 43% on the bank news and wamu filing suit against the FDIC! :D

Krypton
I'v been loving this 1 week rally. Since Friday, I'm up 10% on X. Yea, it's short-term, and I'm long-term, but I can't help feeling good about it. But I don't discount the fact I could lose all gains in one day. Doesn't bother me though.
Capitalizt
As I type this, X is at $23.90..You're welcome for the tip krypt ;)

Take some more advice and sell now before it plummets back to $19. Bulls make money. Bears make money. Pigs get slaughtered. The market is overbought here.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 [134] 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 
Privacy Statement