|
flamebait resume advice (pg. 101)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
Witness statements are real evidence.
Especially when they contradict statements made by those who gave evidence in court and the information was contradictory. |
Honestly Mr. Ashley, I have to believe that your version of events is a little skewed, at this point. If the prosecutor objected to evidence you meant to present and the judge agreed, your evidence was likely not very exculpatory. |
|
|
| w_ashley |
| quote: | Originally posted by EddieZilker
Honestly Mr. Ashley, I have to believe that your version of events is a little skewed, at this point. If the prosecutor objected to evidence you meant to present and the judge agreed, your evidence was likely not very exculpatory. |
Think that. The judge expressly limited my ability to present information which surrounded witness statements and my version of the event. Get a copy of the transcript if you don't believe me. |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
Think that. The judge expressly limited my ability to present information which surrounded witness statements and my version of the event. Get a copy of the transcript if you don't believe me. |
I would love to do that. Please provide me with the court clerk's address and case number and I'll get right on that.
But, FWIW, it's common practice for a court reporter not to transcribe their steno unless it's been requested - has it? |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
doubtful.
What is the name of the person who knows me and how do you know them? |
If you think for a second I would disclose any personal information about someone I care about to you then you're even more crazy then I thought. |
|
|
| w_ashley |
| quote: | Originally posted by EddieZilker
I would love to do that. Please provide me with the court clerk's address and case number and I'll get right on that.
But, FWIW, it's common practice for a court reporter not to transcribe their steno unless it's been requested - has it? |
Transcriptions are available to be purchased at the courthouse.
Kitchener Courthouse
200 Frederick St.
Kitchener ON N2H 6P1
Criminal - Ontario Court of Justice tel. 519-741-3300
You should be able to find it by giving them my name. and the year.
I lookedup the info but I don't have all information with me currently where I am writing from.
Moral is local perhaps he will call the courthouse for you to get the transcript number. |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
Transcriptions are available to be purchased at the courthouse.
Kitchener Courthouse
200 Frederick St.
Kitchener ON N2H 6P1
Criminal - Ontario Court of Justice tel. 519-741-3300
You should be able to find it by giving them my name. and the year.
I lookup the info but I don't have all information with me currently where I am writing from.
Moral is local perhaps he will call the courthouse for you to get the transcript number. |
Day, Month, Year and full name, please. |
|
|
| w_ashley |
Also this is my response to my medical files held at the hospital in regard to my stay at Grand as recounted 2 years ago less a week. I was held three years before this for a little over a month while my court case was ongoing, I was suppose to be self representative but was completely removed from the process.
Items in brackets are added comments that were added when posting this.
And FYI why would I post this to feed fuel to the people attacking me. Because the fact is, I was abused and at some point things will come into account. At least I have presented the information truthfully as it is from my perspective.
BEFORE YOU JUDGE, I suggest you take into account this woman had a personal vendetta against myself. Her findings were not upheld in subsequent assessments. I have never required medication to function. I haven't taken any medication since I was released after being held for a month.
I realize the probable outcome of posting this is that the doctors comments will be accepted and my own ignored; however, I would ask you do not make judgment unless you verify what is stated as true, and not hearsay. All medical tests showed up normal. The only issues stated are those outlined below, and this was enough for her to hold me for a month and force medicate myself, at a high level, and deprive myself from access to my trial.
I was held in Grandriver Hospital on a Form 2/ and a Form 3. I have since obtained the Doctors summary. Within it I found a number of errors and lies. I feel that this is a cause for concern in treating the Physician as competent in regard to treating individuals.
Information which is inaccurate is listed below, and it is a lot.
She states: "There was a history of change in behavior, which began several years ago when in grade 10 he stopped going to school, as he did not feel it was necessary"
At no time was this the case, I was suffering from severe fatigue and general physical unwellness such as shooting neck pains. (as well as later gastro intestinal issues. At no time did I state that I stoped going because it wasn't necessary. This is a fabricated lie. I stopped going due to not being well rested and not feeling well enough to go to classes, or going to school and sleeping. I was in terrible health and horribly overweight. )
I also had been threatened and attacked at school on a number of occasions, which the administration did nothing to protect me from. (This caused a partially spoiled environment, and noticably upset me on a handful of occasions. Harasment was so severe by two individuals I had an apple core chucked at me and explode on contact with myself. I was openly attacked in a school hallway and the person didn't even get suspended. The safe schools act however only came into force in the year 2000; however both the # Expulsion of a Pupil Regulation - Education Act R.S.O. 1990, c. E-2 and
# Suspension of a Pupil Regulation- Education Act R.S.O. 1990, c. E-2 were available.) I fell behind on work, and was forced to leave school until the next term. (This was done by the vice principal McPhail not due to not thinking it was necessary. My mother then immediately stated I would be required to enter the workforce. They consulted one another and determined the term expulsion without speaking to me.)
"At times he had worked, at other times had not, but had continued to live in his parents' home."
I moved out on one occasion but the person I moved in with was preparing to move, so the reason for being there was no longer applicable. Also my parents continued to let me live in their home and I was paying room and board. I quit work because I was mistreated at work, and as a result of the stress of the work I took time off to sort my life out, which appeared to have no future in the service industry. (The inaccuracy is that it makes no mention I made several attempts to move out, but wasn't making enough money to support myself. I also paid room and board until my money ran out.)
"There had been some legal involvement."
There had not been legal involvement, the only time police were called to the house was when my brother attacked me because I was withholding his CD's because he had my property and would not return it. I chose not to press charges even though he cracked my skull, and caused skull deformation.
"In August 2004, he was convicted on charges related to an incident which occurred in a 7/11 Store in January 2004 where he jumped over a counter, demanded cigarettes, and had been aggressive and bizarre."
This is not true, while I was arrested outside of a 7/11 stemming from a phone call by the store clerk after I requested the police be called, I at no time jumped over a counter, nor was I aggressive with the clerk, and only became seriously upset after being pepper sprayed by a police office who profiled me as assaultive, even though I was only involved in dialog with the store clerk, because she stated I looked 23 twice but still refused me sale of cigarettes, even though the law stated at the time I only needed to look 19.
Apparently he has refused to recognize the court and felt that they did not have any jurisdiction over him.
I only refused to recognize the court after they stated they were not in sitting as representative for the Queen of Canada, as judges are required to be. I would not recognize a Canadian court which did not derive its legal standing stemming from the Queen. (To further this, part of the issue is that when speaking with the justice of the peace I requested a "hearing", he ordered a "hearing" not a "trial". However it was seemingly my prerogative. When arriving in court it was a "trial", of course you would state that of course it was a trial. Hearings are not the same as trials. Fact that there were numerous legal issues with the presentation. By the end when the judge stated falsehoods in delivering her synopsis I objected and rejected recognition of the court and demanded to speak to a representative of the Queen or Prime Minister. The judge then ordered me pepper sprayed. I spoke with the cop outside. Refused to sign the court documents on grounds they were flawed and left after I was instructed by the court officers that it was sufficient and I could leave, after a very short stand off with a number of individuals.)
As for jurisdiction, courts do not have jurisdictions over people, they hear cases, within a land area, or in cases of citizenship for acts. Courts do not have exclusive jurisdictions over people. They may create court orders in relation to people, however there was no such court order in existence, only an agreement with police to appear in court, which is not a court order, but a private contract. At my arraignment I was granted a hearing, and was not put in custody. Technically the court did not have jurisdiction over me.
"He had, however, been quite upset at his conviction, had gone back to court and created a disturbance there, which precipitated this admission to hospital."
During the judges rendering I caught the judge stating lies in regards to statements made in court. When I objected she acknowledged her lies, became redfaced then ordered police to "Spray me.". Clearly unjudicious behavior. Since I was conspired against, and the police would not do anything to stop the issue of corruption of justice or the conspiracy. After I spoke with the Officer in Charge in relation to false information testified and made appear to the Court of Appeals, both of which received no assurances or hearing as to the issues, simply dismissing the matters, and taking measures to contact other individuals and having no movement in insuring resolution to what I saw as injustice. I went to the court to deliver a declaration which called for anyone who was aware of corruption of justice or crimes against humanity to come forward. While it was bizarre, since the court allowed a conspiracy to happen, and the judge lied, and admitted to it, only to have the system ignore the situation was of deep concern to me, and still is. Technically I did nothing illegal while there, yet I was forcibly ejected from the courthouse without cause, and unreasonably attacked when I tried to get information as to why I was being objected. I did not resist, and was held without food for a number of days before being taken to Grandriver.
She goes on to state:
"On initial assessment, he presented as a tall, well built young man. His hair was long and matted and he had obviously not been taking of himself."
I was in very good health, perhaps the best health of my life. My hair was matted, as I chose to let my hair naturally grow. I was very much taking care of myself in what I felt was right. Pepperspray from the 7/11 incident however had ruined my hair. Although I take "taking of himself" to mean taking care, rather than any other meaning it may hold. (I let my hair stay in a mono dread. It was basically a afro. After the police sprayed me, it caused my hair to be ruined somewhat. My mother also gave me a feltish blanket that caused red felt to get caught in my hair. I had been taking care of myself such as protecting my nails, working out regularly, showering, etc..)
"Speech was rambling and thought disordered and he presented as grandiose and delusional."
The doctor made no attempt to state she was having difficulty understanding me, as I was speaking openly. If she would have made attempts to state that she couldn't understand me then I could have attempted to explain in a different manner. Also she seemed to be following our discussion, so I don't understand where rambling or thought disordered is coming from in that statement. She simply made no attempt to express there was issue with our discussion, and let on she understood our communication. )Note she state presented as, not that I was. Also I had just been starved for a few days. Obviously people who havn't eaten and just went through a traumatic experience may present a little off. Although I had discourses with the doctor, and she had ample time to ask for clarification.)
"Collateral history obtained from is family indicated marked deterioration since he was charged with the offense at the 7/11 store."
The information my parents gave was not wholly accurate. My behavior remained the same after the 7/11 incident. I spent time researching law for my court case. My family did not beleive me, and in general their unwillingness to support my version of the events, showed they did not beleive me, and instead chose to ignore and failed to offer any support. They let me be isolated for a couple years, and made no attempts to communicate with me, on the contrary they simply didn't want to communicate with me. Their judging of my behavior was based on next to no interaction with me while dismissing my concerns which were valid and remain valid. We had a difference of opinion in fundamental aspects of our belief systems, and we still do.
"His cousin stated that he had expressed belief that he was a Nation State unto himself."
At no time did I ever use the term Nation State ascribed to myself, so any statement of that sort would have been a misrepresentation. I did have a discussion with her about individuals right to sovereign self representation as a basic tenement of a free society, and discussed the idea of microstates, which do exist, done so very sanely. I still express my right to self representation in my affairs in the world, as we all have that right. (I did have a discussion with her once about micro states, if she confered this to mean I was a nationstate, it was totally due to her confusion of the two terms microstate and nation state. Nation states are groupings of people, not individuals. In self recognition of my sovereignty, I was a sort of microstate.)
"Bill had no insight into the fact that he was unwell and was not willing to take medication"
I knew very well that the medication was not needed, except for when I was held at Grandriver I have never in any other situation had medication needed. It has been 3 years since Grandriver, and I have yet to take any medication, nor have a need for medication. I'm attending UW and have also worked without needing medication. I do not have any symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations etc... and my recent diagnosis states that my issues stem from the fact I don't like communicating with people, which is also untrue. I frankly had a difference of belief system, and expressed myself as an independent person, and was attacked as a result of it. There is no evidence that medication was required, and I was against and stated my objection to medication, more so after I was forcibly injected with it while strapped to a bed. I still see no evidence why medication was required, or evidence of why my right to self determination was ignored under a form, as I presented no risk to anyone including myself, nor was there evidence presented as t why others would be a risk to me. Forming and force medicating me to protect me from other people doing harm to me, makes absolutely no sense. It actually ended up harming me by doing so, and that was a great injustice. (2 more years have nearly passed since writing, I havn't had any altercations with the law, and I have yet to be medicated since I was released in 2004, after the month being held. I have yet to have any hallucinations, and all my delusions are real events. No one has presented evidence to prove that the events didn't occur. I still attest that every human has the right to self determination, and it is a belief issue, not a mental issue.)
"The diagnosis on admission was of a (edited)illness, which apparently had come on insidiously."
Is insidious onset meaning, as my belief system changed, and I chose to do things I did not do before consciously and with reasonable grounds, to a point of cultural difference being noticeable. I still stand by the choices I made during that period as the right choices, I had good reason for doing everything I did. (This is total bull, as I was fully aware of my state and my actions. Yeah I realized that I was odd in my beliefs, I still recognize this. But I support my reasons for my beliefs. It is not ungrounded, illogical thought process. that diagnosis was countered by a mental health team after a 30 day assessment, and did not find have the same finding. Why is it that her finding after a very short assessment get refuted after a much longer period of assessment, one that gave me more time to recover from being starved.
"There was evidence of grandiose and paranoid ideation."
I had grandiose ideas , but not paranoid ones, on the contrary I felt no risk to myself. The reason they were grandiose is because I didn't have support of them. They are rational and well meaning ideas and continue to be. (The only reason my ideations were grandiose and they still are is because I value my rights as an individual, and firmly believe that people should be free from state oppression.)
"He did not appear competent to make treatment decisions and his mother agreed to act as a substitute decision maker."
I refused treatment as it wasn't needed. I rejected the idea of my right to make my own treatment decisions. The rights adviser however said, I had no choice. So sarcastically I chose the government as my option. He however rejected that option, at which point I sarcastically stated, I guess that leaves my family then. It was a total farce of a situation, I was able to communicate that I had desire to continue my own affairs, it was total stupidity to ask me who I'd like to make my decisions, if I deemed to be unable to make decisions. Likewise the process was a joke. Essentially my substitute was chosen for me, and I rejected the process. Likewise my right to self representation in court was also removed against my wishes. Yet they let me manage my appeal to the consent and capacity board - this makes no sense. My mother who was named as substitute, completely disregarded my wishes, and attacked me. I did not wish her to be my substitute because she can't make rational choices that take my beliefs into consideration. I was assaulted on numerous occasions. (What was the reason for not appearing competent. The fact I was laying calm in bed?)
"Bill continued in hospital for some time. "
I was held for over a month against my will outside the court process after the charges were dropped. (I was "held" by the hospital until my charges were dropped and the case dismissed and had my head shaved. Had medical tests showing no abnormalities in my brain processes.)
"He was certified and appealed to both this and the incompetency status, which were, however, upheld by a review board."
The review board was also a bad joke. I was highly medicated and unable to concentrate and was very agitated, I was suffering negative side effects of the medication at the time. They dosed me up prior to the meeting, and I was regularly being medicated even before the hearing. There decision was made seemingly exclusively on the doctors statements, and gave no hearing as to my wishes.I have yet to hear any reason why they chose to keep me held against my will. The doctor also stated inaccurate information at the consent and capacity hearing.
(I was highly highly drugged at the time. The doctor showed up got a phone call and left. After answering a few questions.)
"Once on the medication on a regular basis, his manner and behavior appear more appropriate, although really it was not my sense that his delusional ideation had changed to any great extent."
I was regurgitating the medication, and complying because i was held forcibly there on a committal basis. I was cooperative to stop the assaults and forced injections, and being strapped to the bed. I was not successful in regurgitating the liquid medication in whole at all times. (I was having muscle convulsions, my knees separated and I was chronically dizzy and unable to concentrate. That is an improved state? This still pisses me off. That this woman would have the gall to do what she did.)
"There was no abnormality on routine blood work"
I don't recall ever getting blood work - does this mean that I had blood drawn from me without my knowledge? (I still have yet to confirm if this was also approved without my consent. I did find out though that they drugged me at least on one occasion without me knowing. They also drugged me twice with different drugs within the same time span of effect. This was around the same time my muscled tightened to the point my knee joints started grinding and popping out of joint.
"They beleive that he is quite delusional and believes that he owns everything in the world, all land, houses etc. and they say that he talks about being derived from a root and at other times believes that he is God."
This is a clear misrepresentation. In having theological discussions with my father we discussed fundamentals outside of civil law. Eg. As humans in communion with God we all have equal rights and mutually share the planet. Although there are laws which create deeded land uses as a society we transcend this and all share equally. It is reasonable use, and social customs that present ethics in regard to usage of property, ultimately however given reason there are no civil barriers to use of property. I stated implicitly against the idea of ownership, but instead the idea was equal right in reason. The root I was talking about wasn't the plant source, it was leading to the concept of Logos. That is a source, and I still beleive this, it is the fundamental of belief, where do you think we come from, no where? As for statements of me being God, this is another misunderstanding - by bieng god I mean a union with God, a communion, and mutually representative, as God has chosen for all us to be representative of our purpose in life. I'm actually an ordained minister currently. I still stand by those beliefs. It is an issue of conscientious beleif, not a mental health issue. (These were during talks about metaphysics and social beliefs. It essentially was speaking that egalitarianism is a fundamental underlying element in the world. That we are all equal with God as expressing his message, and receiving his message. It is still my spiritual belief. This doesn't mean I can just go out and take things from people, never have I stated that. It was simply a lack of adequate insight to make statements that don't begin to fully contain my thoughts or take them out of context.)
"He doesn't matter about dying because he can't really die."
I still support this notion, not on biological grounds but I was speaking of "full life" spiritual life etc.. since we all have ever lasting life. There is really no logical conclusion. I simply refuse to belief we cease to exist at biological death, and thus there is no reason to have fear in death instead we should do what we feel is right, without worries of our morality. Instead to live up to our ideals on the basis of doing what is right rather than doing what preserve the body, soley. This does not mean reckless abandonment of our health, but instead the willingness to sacrifice ourselves for a higher purpose, such as saving others lives, doing a greater community service or upholding a higher ideal. I think martyrdom is still a valid course of action if there is reason to beleive it will make a better world. To state again this doesn't mean reckless self abandonment but instead reasoned decision making with valid cause.
(I still live my life like I live for eternity because life is inexplicable in how it exists beyond a logical foundation. I am not concerned with death because God will deliver me to where I will go. I have no cause to fear death because it is gods will. While I may physically pass on I do not live my life for materialist gain, I live to express right belief and action. While this may seem messed up, it is my belief. It isn't mentally unstable. I don't put myself at risk as I still don't seek to harm myself or cause me damage. It doesn't mean I will do things that would kill me recklessly.)
"They beleive he is suffering hallucinations and has covered all the mirrors in the house and will not watch television."
There was one occasion of covering mirrors, and I did so because I felt that they created a self obsession and vanity. I still think being vain is something to be averted. This was not ongoing behavior, except my own mirrors, because I felt that there was no need to be concerned about my appearance, instead I should just accept myself for who I am. I still think this is a rational belief.
As for TV, who cares, the programming sucked, and we never had cable. I have no obligation to watch TV. I spent time online, in chat groups and researching AI, Philosophy and making music. TV didn't and still largely doesn't appeal. I like the history channel when non modern history programs are on, and watch the news and that is about it.
(I honestly didn't want to be vain. I'd rather see the world than myself. Narcissism is sadly an issue when people are more held up in how they look than how they act. I didn't have cable, and programming just sucks in general. Even with cable 99% of the time I end up flicking through the channels cause nothing catches my interest. I can manage to watch the odd history show or news but not much else.)
"They state that his speech is disorganized and that he talks extremely fast, rambles on out loud to himself, even after other people have left the room."
They were rude, and are poor communicators. They had no patience to let me answer their questions if it was a reply longer than one sentence. They were just looking for what they like to hear and no what I had to say. (I'm only rambling to myself because I was communicating and I wasn't done. My parents would start a discussion but once I started saying things that they didn't support, they'd just leave the room. This wasn't an instance of rambling, it was an instance of them not wanting to hear what they don't agree with. They were only interested in telling their story not listening to mine. Much like now most likely with those reading. I like to fully explain myself. Part of the issue of misrepresenting my statements is not listeinig to me fully explain. Much the same issue of the doctor in not taking enough time to let me fully express things that she may have been uncertain on.)
"They have stated he has stated eating roots and bark from trees and boiling them for tea."
This was not a regular occurrence, and I researched the herbal properties of specific trees - no roots were being eaten, although there are a number of tubers that people regularly eat, and a number that have medicinal properties. So what, you think tea isn't from a plant? People eat plants all the time. Where do you think tea comes from? (How is this relevant to holding me and drugging me?)
"Communication was somewhat difficult as he displays frank thought disorder and his conversation was difficult to follow much of the time"
I had just gone without eating for 3 or so days. Then was force medicated. She was poor at communicating, as she never stated ongoing she had difficulty with what I was expressing. I could have adjusted my method of communication if she had expressed issues with understanding what I was saying. (Also I felt I was relatively clear in my communication. "Frank thought disorder" I tell the truth. This is a thought disorder? Frankness ain't a thought disorder. "My conversation" there were two people there.)
"He does appear to be quite deluded and is likely suffering hallucinations also."
What delusions? How so, what hallucinations? (I still find this funny, she states I had hallucinations but has no evidence it occured. This only lumps on to the hearsay and non medical nature of her statements. Also she still fails to identify any delusiosn other than saying, my belief system is not allowed. It is a belief, it is a constitutional right. Which belief was delusional? Where is there support for any of these as being delusional?
"He obviously requires admission o a Form 1."
Based on hearsay, my state after being starved and my choice to grow my hair and not use chemically engineered cleaning agents on my body?
Oddly though a Form 1 never occurred.
----------------------
I wont recap all documents. But I'm still offended in regard to how I was abused by the hospital system. Until you take constructive steps to protect people from abuses by hospital staff and apologize for your maltreatment of myself this remain an open issue.
I deserve an apology and compensation for what was done to me. Also the attending doctors Martina Power and James O'Doherty should be barred from practicing again due to their willingness to ignore the basic principles of knowledgeable consent. Likewise some of the staff there are also issued, and I think it should involve more measures to resolve the issues that existed at that point. This would include changing some policies in Grandriver which impeded and restricts patients unreasonably.
I honestly beleive this, and it is nothing against anyone for who they are, merely a result of what I went through, it was an injustice, and no one should be put in the situation I was. I did nothing wrong and I was tortured.
More information is available on request. While I sense this will likely just be ignored, seriously consider this, I feel hurt just by thinking about this situation.
Marlina Power did it for revenge. |
|
|
| w_ashley |
| quote: | Originally posted by EddieZilker
Day, Month, Year and full name, please. |
Just get everything Under "William Ashley"
If they have nothing for that, let me know, I can probably see about assisting your process of getting it tomorrow. |
|
|
| idoru |
| Holy ing . :stongue: |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: |
"Speech was rambling and thought disordered and he presented as grandiose and delusional." |
what a miserable bitch. i simply cannot believe this to be true. |
|
|
| PETRAN |
| Guys, i think that you seriously should stop it now. This conversation doesn't lead anywhere and it is not fun anymore. WTF is this some sort of a medieval street-court or something? ******** man you are not supposed to respond to every single post that people make, just ignore them and do something more interesting. Its just a f*cking internet forum and a not so serious one so do something more productive and stop trolling each other morons. Its 100 pages for s sake. |
|
|
|
|
