|
flamebait resume advice (pg. 52)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| SYSTEM-J |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
Actually it is since he just accused me of accusing him. |
It's ing irrelevant! That's my point! The fact you're still arguing it shows you still can't understand.
| quote: | | Caching that is at another period from the point of revision of the document. You should notice there are many other typos in the Feb. 2nd document. Somehow only this 1 error remained which should of easily been detected by the spell check. |
Point all these other typos out, please. I can see one other typo, which is from a clause you completely removed from the version you linked in your OP. And there are two errors. "Gramdmothers" has been pointed out to you multiple ing times, you idiot. Learn to read.
| quote: | | You then pointed out the E=mail thing |
As I've already told you, it wasn't me. Learn to ing follow.
| quote: | | As explained before, you have no verifiable evidence from this end and vice versa. |
You have no verifiable proof you ran any of the spell-checks you claim to have done. No verifiable proof you didn't miss a word out through neglect either. So shut the up about "verifiable proof". This is clearly an argument based on likelihood and Occam's Razor. Given your repeated failures of comprehension, memory and attentiveness in this thread, failures I've provided proof of, and given the complexity of the "hacker" explanation, Occam's Razor says you ed up. Everyone else in this thread can see that. |
|
|
| w_ashley |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
It's ing irrelevant! That's my point! The fact you're still arguing it shows you still can't understand.
|
Moot.
| quote: | | Point all these other typos out, please. I can see one other typo, which is from a clause you completely removed from the version you linked in your OP. And there are two errors. "Gramdmothers" has been pointed out to you multiple ing times, you idiot. Learn to read. |
Are you suggesting I can't read?
Feb 2nd errors that did not exist in contested document:
Counsellor
Personel
Representitive
maintenence
| quote: |
As I've already told you, it wasn't me. Learn to ing follow. |
Wasn't you that?
| quote: | | You have no verifiable proof you ran any of the spell-checks you claim to have done. No verifiable proof you didn't miss a word out through neglect either. |
Hence the moot point. I would say that is possible if one check occurred but it is highly unlikely with multiple checks.
| quote: | | So shut the up about "verifiable proof". |
How about you drop it if you don't have evidence.
| quote: | | This is clearly an argument based on likelihood and Occam's Razor. Given your repeated failures of comprehension, memory and attentiveness in this thread, failures I've provided proof of, and given the complexity of the "hacker" explanation, Occam's Razor says you ed up. Everyone else in this thread can see that. |
The only failure in this post is you. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| So points are moot just because you can't accept them? :stongue: |
|
|
| w_ashley |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
So points are moot just because you can't accept them? :stongue: |
Points are moot because neither of us have substantiated proof and we have a different version of events. It is thus impossible to prove. We are both in the realm of rhetorical potential rather than irrefutable fact.
while certain points can be won such as "yes there were errors and some form of error correction occurred", he then altered position to state it wasn't done well enough. Etc.. Since the only information he has available on the check is from me, and he chooses to refute my honesty, it is nothing but rhetoric trying to prove a case instead of demonstrate fact. So his argument is invalid in terms of verifiability. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| Actually only YOU have unsubstantiated anything, and only YOUR version differs from what is plainly obvious to anyone who isn't missing a few screws. |
|
|
| w_ashley |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
Actually only YOU have unsubstantiated anything, and only YOUR version differs from what is plainly obvious to anyone who isn't missing a few screws. |
Actually you are a bitch who is spewing from the wrong end. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
spewing from the wrong end. |
Can smell your own kind, huh? ;) |
|
|
| w_ashley |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
Can smell your own kind, huh? ;) |
moot. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
:stongue: :stongue:
Omg we're being trolled ing HARD. |
|
|
| osterzone |
| System J and Ashely...get a ing life FFS. How many hours have you wasted over the last week posting in this thread? |
|
|
|
|
