return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 
flamebait resume advice (pg. 91)
View this Thread in Original format
w_ashley
quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
I can almost guarantee you will not win

Win what?



quote:
And it would seem your understanding of pro socio is a little murky, unless someone else has filed on your behalf - which doesn't really make any sense.


I know the terms.
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by ********
The whole notion of the state and nationalism, authority, etc.. are aberrant notions.


God you’re a pretentious wanker. And completely wrong too.
EddieZilker
quote:
Originally posted by ********
Win what?


Your arguments' validity are contingent upon you winning a case, you just implied was being argued for you, pro-socio, pro-bono.

The implication being that, although your arguments have no legal terra firma to stand on, that will soon not be the case.










Is this another no win, no lose scenario - just results?
w_ashley
quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
Your arguments' validity are contingent upon you winning a case, you just implied was being argued for you, pro-socio, pro-bono.

The implication being that, although your arguments have no legal terra firma to stand on, that will soon not be the case.

Is this another no win, no lose scenario - just results?


Eddie, your argument is absurd.

1. you havn't indicated a law prohibiting sale to a 23 year old.
2. you have some how convoluted I am trying to do something when I have clearly indicated I am patiently waiting.
3. I have not indicated that the law will change, if anything things will continue to get more restrictive.

I really don't get what you are trying to do.
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by ********
back it up.


Pretentious wanker: you make loose assertions that are ultimately devoid of any real thought or understanding, about all manner of topics you don’t really know anything about.

Completely wrong: the state, authority, nationalism etc have existed for as long as modern man, and are the natural outcomes of community. every liveable landmass is divided into states. Every human society that has ever existed has had some level of authority inside it. Inside every state there exists a certain level of nationalism.

You cannot describe something as “aberrant” when such a thing represents the norm.
EddieZilker
quote:
Originally posted by ********
Eddie, your argument is absurd.

1. you havn't indicated a law prohibiting sale to a 23 year old.


This, here, is one of many straw-men logical fallacies festering in this thread. It is called a straw man because it functions on a false interpretation of my argument which serves to weaken it. There has never, ever, been stipulated by me that it was illegal to sell cigarettes to a 23 year old - even though you argue like a ing twelve year-old girl.
w_ashley
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
Pretentious wanker: you make loose assertions that are ultimately devoid of any real thought or understanding, about all manner of topics you don’t really know anything about.


Such as?



quote:
Completely wrong: the state, authority, nationalism etc have existed for as long as modern man, and are the natural outcomes of community. every liveable landmass is divided into states.


What landmass isn't livable? What landmass is?



quote:
Every human society that has ever existed has had some level of authority inside it.


Egalitarianism is a real thing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egalitarianism

quote:
Inside every state there exists a certain level of nationlism.



Sovereign state
A nation is a grouping of people - for nationalism there must be a nation.

A sovereign state does not require nationhood.



quote:
You cannot describe something as “aberrant” when such a thing represents the norm.


When opposed to natural order I can. Humanity ain't the norm.
idoru
You guys realize that there's no way in hell that you will ever get through to this , right?
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by ********
Such as?





What landmass isn't livable? What landmass is?





Egalitarianism is a real thing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egalitarianism




Sovereign state
A nation is a grouping of people - for nationalism there must be a nation.

A sovereign state does not require nationhood.





When opposed to natural order I can. Humanity ain't the norm.


you are stupid.
w_ashley
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
you are stupid.


You are an al qaeda supporter and pro Iranian. :)

EddieZilker
quote:
Originally posted by idoru
You guys realize that there's no way in hell that you will ever get through to this , right?


He is as thick and obdurate as a wet sack of broken hammers, but that's what makes him so much fun to play with.
w_ashley
quote:
Originally posted by idoru
You guys realize that there's no way in hell that you will ever get through to this , right?


How about we save some time.

What is your bottom line, what are you trying to accomplish.


You'd like me to my life up by taking a bunch of toxic chemicals that up my ability to think and move while doing hard labour just to keep myself fed?

If not, what is your message?
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 
Privacy Statement