|
flamebait resume advice (pg. 43)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Capitalizt |
| quote: | Originally posted by Danny Ocean
you ing delusional paranoid government tax leaching scum piece of goat . |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
How am I paranoid? |
I like how he didn't question the rest of the sentence. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| Yeah Eric and I had a good lul about that. :stongue: |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
I've had no "mental issues" as my acts have been justified and logical. If you actually question why something occurred, there are substantiated reasons for everything.
Since I've seen my own medical files and the grounds that were used such as "drank tea made from leaves, roots and tree bark", or "has a logical explanation for thinking he is god". Not only were many of the comments taken out of context, but the actual asssessments were blunted and really didn't capture the spirit of what the actual situation was. It was really bad assessment, and I honestly feel that it was done only to confine and drug me, rather than actually give an unbiased assessment. Personally there is nothing issued about drinking natural teas, and there is nothing issued about having a spiritual belief system. Those are thought police actions, and my medical assessments at that time are filled with what is quite frankly bad practice, and false grounds for force medicating someone. I acted fully within my rights and reasonably. |
I've said this before, William, but you seem to have a serious problem understanding causality. You seem unable to comprehend that your actions could be misinterpreted in any way, or that events could pan out in any other way than how you predicted. Your grasp of irony is incredibly weak and you interpret any contrary opinion to yours as malicious or spiteful.
Basically, you seem to have quite a simplistic or childish view of how things work. Take this resume: it's obvious to everyone you missed a couple of typos, typos that we all saw the first time we read it, typos that have been in exactly the same places since the 2nd of February. However, you're so unwilling or unable to realise you made a mistake and weren't thorough enough on your proof-read that you'll accuse people of hacking into your account on the grounds of being Internet trolls out to spite you. To you, a detailed act of persecution against you is more likely than an oversight or error on your part.
Sadly, I'm pretty confident that exactly the same thought process is the missing piece of your other tales of injustice and government persecution. Something will have happened where it was very obvious you were wrong or naive or just not thinking of all the possible outcomes. You will have denied this, probably become hostile and unreceptive to anyone's attempts to get through to you, developed a victim complex at a very rapid pace. The other party would have seen you for what you are: someone with obvious problems.
I don't think you're harmful or particularly psychotic, but you clearly have a fundamental problem in reading and predicting situations, in accepting your own mistakes and just generally seeing past your own little view of how things should be. I'm sure you'll respond to this by either calling me a hateful troll or giving me a deluge of poorly written rhetoric about freedoms, expression and life-views, but you should have a serious consideration of what I've written. |
|
|
| Magadansky |
| A wall would be easier to convince than ********. |
|
|
| w_ashley |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
I've said this before, William, but you seem to have a serious problem understanding causality. |
Utter tripe. I understand cause and effect and a sequence of events just fine. This is undemonstrated rhetorical bull.
| quote: | | You seem unable to comprehend that your actions could be misinterpreted in any way, |
What actions. If someone misinterprets something, it isn't the act that is at fault, it is the faculty of the person misinterpreting.
| quote: | | or that events could pan out in any other way than how you predicted. |
When did you surmise that I am unable to reason multiple outcomes. That is once again utter bull.
| quote: | | Your grasp of irony is incredibly weak and you interpret any contrary opinion to yours as malicious or spiteful. |
Untrue. Some things are attacking my character, other comments on the site do not, even if they aren't in line with my own thoughts. There are a number of posters who do clearly attack and show up to attack myself. Moral Hazard is one of them. PKC use to be one, although he has softened up quite a bit since I confronted him some time ago. ElFreak/ElNazi or Scheude is also someone, although I'm not the only one. The list of course continues, however, I am not stating that these people specifically only attack myself. In general about 10 of the regulars here are easily identifiable trolls. Some have certain soft spots - Jenny for instance as demonstrated here lobbies that the Medical Institution has no faults and could never do something like abuse someone in their care. There are various others who also "haven't liked what I have said in the past" Capitalizt started trolling me after what he deemed to be Commie speak (regardless of the fact I support a free market short of essential public services, and believe in sustainable development). PKC didn't like me playing devils advocate - stemming from my stance of the possibility of a coverup of the real events of 911. The list of course goes on. You are wholly incorrect in me thinking this applies to everyone or in every circumstance. You are sadly misinterpreting, delusional or a jackass just trying to attack.
| quote: | | Basically, you seem to have quite a simplistic or childish view of how things work. |
Utter rhetorical bull. I have a very advanced world view.
| quote: | | Take this resume: it's obvious to everyone you missed a couple of typos, typos that we all saw the first time we read it, typos that have been in exactly the same places since the 2nd of February. However, you're so unwilling or unable to realise you made a mistake and weren't thorough enough on your proof-read |
I proofread multiple times, and corrected all the non foreign language errors. Anything that was spelled incorrectly should have showed up in red. While there were numerous errors, those were spell checked.
The same has occurred with posting on this, and other sites. I screen my posts before I post, and errors still occur, even though no red appears, which shows up later, after I detect typos in posting. While this you may state is delusion - the fact is, it isn't behind the realm of possibility, since I have had many many Trojans on my computers. And there are people who would take advantage of that to harass or vandalize people.
| quote: | | Sadly, I'm pretty confident that exactly the same thought process is the missing piece of your other tales of injustice and government persecution. Something will have happened where it was very obvious you were wrong or naive or just not thinking of all the possible outcomes. |
You legitimizing what occurred is frankly just showing yourself to lack basic morality.
| quote: | | You will have denied this, probably become hostile and unreceptive to anyone's attempts to get through to you, |
I don't blame myself for other people confining and drugging me. It was their faulty judgment not mine, so trying to lay blame on me for others immoral actions is just plain faulty on your part.
| quote: | | developed a victim complex at a very rapid pace. The other party would have seen you for what you are: someone with obvious problems. |
It isn't hard to play the victim when you have victimized. If you are victimized by a private person or the government, it is still victimization.
| quote: | | I don't think you're harmful or particularly psychotic, but you clearly have a fundamental problem in reading and predicting situations, |
I don't take threat against person as a deterrent if I am in right. If people act immorally, it isn't going to deprive me of taking just action. I won't be intimidated by that premise. You are weak minded to do so, once again a character flaw on your part.
| quote: | | in accepting your own mistakes and just generally seeing past your own little view of how things should be. I'm sure you'll respond to this by either calling me a hateful troll or giving me a deluge of poorly written rhetoric about freedoms, expression and life-views, but you should have a serious consideration of what I've written. |
I think you are trying to poke at me, but you are just expressing an immoral chicken view point. I don't agree with your view. Or how you think people should go about living their lives as snakes living in fear. |
|
|
| Domesticated |
| You're a moron. |
|
|
| Jackson |
| quote: | Originally posted by Domesticated
You're a moron. |
|
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
I don't think you're harmful or particularly psychotic, but you clearly have a fundamental problem in reading and predicting situations, in accepting your own mistakes and just generally seeing past your own little view of how things should be. |
Possibly Schizotypal Personality Disorder.
But an internet diagnosis by an unlicensed wanna-be, such as myself, is largely irrelevant. |
|
|
| blitz~ |
i just want to be part of this epic thread.
******** deserves a encyclopediadramatica entry. |
|
|
| w_ashley |
| quote: | Originally posted by EddieZilker
Possibly Schizotypal Personality Disorder.
But an internet diagnosis by an unlicensed wanna-be, such as myself, is largely irrelevant. |
I'm curious what are your diagnostic factors? |
|
|
| w_ashley |
| quote: | | acute discomfort with, and reduced capacity for, close relationships |
I have no discomfort or reduced capacity in having close relationships with people. Frankly I am very open with people and generally involved with them when they are interested. I share myself, and I am a loyal friend. Some people actually consider me too involved, mostly my parents from time to time. I've had many a friends over my life. I easily socialize with others.
Although here is the thing. There are many people I don't like, because of their personality and interests. In some instances it doesn't attract me to spend time with people. Everyone does not hang out with everyone. People pick and choose who they associate with. I tend to see the world as a non interventionist. Frankly I tend to be around people much younger than myself, and their interest aren't the same as mine, since I grew up. They are still kids. Although I do still meet people I find interesting or hang out with, but I also travel a lot so, that chat I have with someone at a given place doesn't necessarily form into a strong relationship because I met them and then we parted ways. While I'm sure if I met that person again, we wouldn't be at odds, people have lives. I don't value spending my time communicating with everyone I meet, or adding them to my face book account. I get along fine with people who have the same interests as myself, and are at the same level of maturity. Some points in my life have provided for blossoming of relationships, others haven't. This doesn't mean I am unable or find it painful - I just pick and choose who I actually associate with. It isn't difficulty I just don't surround myself with people I have no interest in on a personal level. While I'm not the type to just turn people away, I don't put an effort into befriending everyone, I am quite selective in who I associate with.
I have no cognitive or perceptual distortions. If you are aware of them, then state them. Pointing out a website that I state didn't have typos on it on March 2nd or 3rd and stating it was compromised is not a distortion, it is a fact. Frankly in this instance there is no trusted source to verify this. While I can admit it did appear on my page likely soon after it was pointed out. There was a very long gap before there was a response to my request to point out any typos. Also using the term - spelling errors, when it was 1 spelling error, has me wonder if an insignificant error wasn't orchestrated because the point was beaten. I do not doubt that if some of you had access to corrupt a data system you would. It is not beyond the capacity of some of you to contact someone who could exploit a system Trojan, or compromise the data via another method. Frankly having Trojans on my system turns my computer into a remote that people can pretty much do anything I can do. If you consider this a perpetual distortion, then I frankly disagree because there is no other verifiable source from my end of the deal. Meaning none of you are here on this end, and if you were then we might have something more than a rhetorical baseless discussion that can only be construed rather than proven.
| quote: | | eccentricities of behavior |
While when cast against "the norm" my so said eccentricities are generally my interests that aren't the norm. I am not alone in doing things such as go hiking and collecting wild mushrooms, or utilize nature for goods. There are lots of naturalists who do many of these things. So it really isn't all that bizarre. I wouldn't go to the extent of calling myself an exhibitionist, but yes I am one of the few males who posts up picks of himself scantily clad; however, those situations were based on others requests. There is nothing wrong in my opinion in showing non frontal nudity shots of oneself. I haven't posted a single picture showing my penis on the site, and that is where I draw the line between acceptable posting and unacceptable posting in terms of my body. Other than this, I travel, make music with FLStudio, bake stuff, read, and exercise. There isn’t much more to it than that. When school is on I have classes, and I go out to places now and then. I don't find that eccentric behaviour. While I do tend to job places rather than walk, I don't find that eccentric, although it isn't the norm.
So I really don't see the basis of your net diagnosis. |
|
|
| igottaknow |
| Its not your fault. |
|
|
|
|
