A dramatic re-enactment of the Ashley home, right now.
Omega_Blue
wow. this thread has exploded.
Capitalizt
quote:
Originally posted by Theresa
Read what I write. I worked for Forwells with both Mary and Tracey. Tracey would never say she didn't know Mary... it's her ing employee (in case you didn't know, Tracey is the daughter of the owner, and the manager of the store)! And yes, I know the space you are talking about, and that space is to get into the office WHICH IS BEHIND THE COUNTER!! You are not permitted to go there. Going there is a breach of the clerks personal space and so she would have felt threatened, and I am willing to bet that she "touched you" to prevent you from grabbing the cigarettes that you said you "would get yourself". Her attempt to prevent you from stealing (which is what was implied whether that was your intention or not) or breaching her personal space, is not "assault" from the way I understand things.
First moral hazard and his contact with ********'s old instructor..now this. We have ashley blaming the cashier..the cop who arrested him..the cops in the courthouse...his former employers..and even his own mother and various doctors who thought he needed help. Everyone except ashley himself seems to agree that he is bat insane.
epicaricacy
i called miss cleo and she sent these brain thought cats to eat your brain washley.
Silky Johnson
It's pretty awesome that this thread got nearly as big as random talking in the matter of only a few days, lol.
Theresa
For the record, it clearly states in the Tobacco Control Act of 1994:
A sign that is in English shall read as follows:
“19? Prove it. Where age is in question the law says we must ask for I.D. when you ask for tobacco. Acceptable I.D.: Ontario driver’s licence, Cdn. passport, Cdn. citizenship card, LLBO photo card, Cdn. Armed Forces I.D. card.”
Just because someone might think you are of particular age, does not mean that the age is not in question. Asking for ID proves that she wasn't certain, regardless of what she may or may not have thought. It is your obligation then to "prove it" as the act states.
I just want to say congratulations Eddie and System-J, for the best internet diagnoses..ever.
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
I've said this before, William, but you seem to have a serious problem understanding causality. You seem unable to comprehend that your actions could be misinterpreted in any way, or that events could pan out in any other way than how you predicted. Your grasp of irony is incredibly weak and you interpret any contrary opinion to yours as malicious or spiteful.
Basically, you seem to have quite a simplistic or childish view of how things work. Take this resume: it's obvious to everyone you missed a couple of typos, typos that we all saw the first time we read it, typos that have been in exactly the same places since the 2nd of February. However, you're so unwilling or unable to realise you made a mistake and weren't thorough enough on your proof-read that you'll accuse people of hacking into your account on the grounds of being Internet trolls out to spite you. To you, a detailed act of persecution against you is more likely than an oversight or error on your part.
Sadly, I'm pretty confident that exactly the same thought process is the missing piece of your other tales of injustice and government persecution. Something will have happened where it was very obvious you were wrong or naive or just not thinking of all the possible outcomes. You will have denied this, probably become hostile and unreceptive to anyone's attempts to get through to you, developed a victim complex at a very rapid pace. The other party would have seen you for what you are: someone with obvious problems.
I don't think you're harmful or particularly psychotic, but you clearly have a fundamental problem in reading and predicting situations, in accepting your own mistakes and just generally seeing past your own little view of how things should be. I'm sure you'll respond to this by either calling me a hateful troll or giving me a deluge of poorly written rhetoric about freedoms, expression and life-views, but you should have a serious consideration of what I've written.
quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
Since you asked, I'll bold what I think applies to you. I will not, however, fish through this cluster- of a thread you started to find each and every example of what gives me cause to believe it a possible diagnosis. Even I have to admit that some of your behavior in this thread seems a little psychotic, therefore contravening such a diagnosis, but currently, to my non-professional mind, the diagnosis falls straight upon Occam's Razor.
People with classic schizotypal personalities are apt to be loners, having few to no intimate relationships. They exhibit extreme anxiety in social situations, often associated more with distrust and an inability to communicate with others than with a negative self-image (See Avatar - both literally negative and an inappropriate affect with the head tilted on a bias and a blank expression). They view themselves as alien or outcast, and this isolation causes pain as they disengage more and more from relationships and the outside world. (While it seems you are engaging the outside world, the very vehicle you have chosen seems only to have further alienated you and made you the object of scorn and ridicule.)
(Current Avatar)
People with schizotypal personalities often have odd patterns of speech and ramble endlessly on tangents to a topic of conversation. They may dress in peculiar ways and have very strange ways of viewing the world around them. Often they harbor unusual ideas, such as believing in the powers of ESP or a sixth sense. At times, they believe they can magically influence people's thoughts, actions and emotions.
In adolescence, signs of a schizotypal personality may begin as a gravitation toward solitary activities or a high level of social anxiety. The child may be an underperformer in school or appear socially out-of-step with peers, and as a result often becomes the subject of bullying or teasing.
Symptoms of schizotypal personality disorder include:
* Incorrect interpretation of events, including feeling that external events have personal meaning
* Peculiar thinking, beliefs or behavior
* Belief in special powers, such as telepathy
* Perceptual alterations, in some cases bodily illusions, including phantom pains or other distortions in the sense of touch * Idiosyncratic speech, such as loose or vague patterns of speaking or tendency to go off on tangents (Such as is seen in your writing) * Suspicious or paranoid ideas * Flat emotions or inappropriate emotional responses * Lack of close friends outside of the immediate family (If you had these, you probably wouldn't behave like such an ass.)
* Persistent and excessive social anxiety that doesn't abate with time
Schizotypal personality disorder can easily be confused with schizophrenia, which is characterized by intense psychosis, a severe mental state characterized by a loss of contact with reality. While people with schizotypal personalities may experience brief psychotic episodes with delusions or hallucinations, they are not as pronounced, frequent or intense as in schizophrenia.
Another key distinction between schizotypal personality disorder and schizophrenia is that people with the personality disorder usually can distinguish between their distorted ideas and reality. Those with schizophrenia generally can't be swayed from their delusions.
epicaricacy
the funniest thing is that he says he speaks french, but can't even speak english.
idoru
I love that my one simple question resulted in a cavalcade of epic posts. :stongue: I'd kill to see what Theresa's friends have to say about the situation now. Theresa, make some calls, damnit! :p
EddieZilker
quote:
Originally posted by Capitalizt
I just want to say congratulations Eddie and System-J, for the best internet diagnoses..ever.
FWIW, it's System-J's observations that gave the inspiration for my hypothesis.
quote:
Originally posted by idoru
I love that my one simple question resulted in a cavalcade of epic posts. :stongue: I'd kill to see what Theresa's friends have to say about the situation now. Theresa, make some calls, damnit! :p
I am hoping for her to be doing just that. I am betting she is doing just that, right now.
My God, this thread. 8 days. 82 pages.
Capitalizt
quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
(2) A person shall not be found to have contravened subsection (1) if it is established that the person attempted to verify that the person was at least eighteen years of age by asking for and being shown documentation prescribed for the purposes of verifying age, and believed on reasonable grounds that the documentation was authentic.
11. No person, unless exempted by the regulations, shall sell a tobacco product by means of a display that permits a person to handle the tobacco product before paying for it.
45. Every person who contravenes section 8, 9, 11 or 12, or any retailer who contravenes section 29, is guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction
(a) for a first offence, to a fine not exceeding $3,000; and
(b) for a subsequent offence, to a fine not exceeding $50,000.
Oh, my, Mr. Ashley. That's a quote from the Tobacco Act. You seem to be either fooled or prevaricating yourself into a corner.
quote:
Originally posted by Theresa Just because someone might think you are of particular age, does not mean that the age is not in question. Asking for ID proves that she wasn't certain, regardless of what she may or may not have thought. It is your obligation then to "prove it" as the act states.
