|
Post Padding Room... (pg. 909)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| DaveSaenz |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Cubano
<~~~ needs some aroz con pollo :whip: |
I know what you're saying bro...;)
Love the pic too! Funaaaaayyyyy :stongue: I just got this funny pic (slides) back of me in the fog holding an umbrella that's inside out. It's f'in awesome! I'll get it scanned tomorrow, and post it here. :toothless It will be a laff......:stongue: I have to be my own model sometimes because of being a pauper and all.
I didn't know about the chillout room either.....
'till later. :tongue3 |
|
|
| DJ Cubano |
| quote: | Originally posted by drizzt81
is that magnetostatics? Cross product of the magnetic Auxiliary field H with the velocity V yields 'd'?
so this is probably about displacement of a moving charge through a B field? |
well it was hubble's constant :conf: , but now you've def. lost me gregor :toothless |
|
|
| DJ Cubano |
Hubble Law:
v = H x d
v - the recessional velocity
H - the Hubble constant
d - the distane to galaxies
H approx. 65km/s/Mpc
is that right? |
|
|
| decibel08 |
| quote: | Originally posted by drizzt81
is that magnetostatics? Cross product of the magnetic Auxiliary field H with the velocity V yields 'd'?
so this is probably about displacement of a moving charge through a B field? |
oh dude the fact that similar things came to mind worries me... too much time with textbooks !
but what is d ? i remember D (cap) being the electric displacement, or the divergence of D being the free charge.
all i remember involving v (velocity) is F = q (E + (v x B)) which i guess could be converted from B to H, and the E could be converted to D... somehow giving del x E = -(dB/dt)
here's to engineer dorks !
»danny«
ps - my least fav from electricity & magneticism: A -- the magnetic vector potential... |
|
|
| decibel08 |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Cubano
Hubble Law:
v = H x d
v - the recessional velocity
H - the Hubble constant
d - the distane to galaxies
H approx. 65km/s/Mpc
is that right? |
oh...
ignore my post |
|
|
| drizzt81 |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Cubano
well it was hubble's constant :conf: , but now you've def. lost me gregor :toothless |
I have little/ no knowledge when it comes to astronomy. I understand some basic concepts, but that is about it.
i was not sure if you were talking about vector quantities, since u used a 'x' (cross, i.e. cross product) and not a '*' for a regular multiplication.
sorry, i had just taken a guess since I had never seen that equation, yet a lot of Magnetic-interation equations deal with the cross product.
anyway, i was 100% off. yippie |
|
|
| DaveSaenz |
I forgot everything from astronomy....:whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip: :whip:
I just need to know the phases of the moon, what time is sunrise/sunset, forcast for tommorow.......:toothless |
|
|
| Sunshine79 |
GUYS!!!!!! didn't f0x tell you!??!
i am _dense_
man o man. thanks for your thoughts, zoom zoom but ...uh.....i was looking for less science and more emotion.
Danny B Good: I think I agree with you. I guess I am still a kid. Or am trying to be (omg 24 approaches!!) and, by the way, I don't mind your spam and i DON'T want to make like a tree, ok?
MUAH!
love u guys! |
|
|
| drizzt81 |
| quote: | Originally posted by decibel08
ps - my least fav from electricity & magneticism: A -- the magnetic vector potential... |
hahha i love that too! yay:
"it doesn't really exist, but we have invented it in order to make magnetostatics and electrostatics 'look' the same."
laf! |
|
|
| drizzt81 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sunshine79
man o man. thanks for your thoughts, zoom zoom but ...uh.....i was looking for less science and more emotion.
|
oh. sorry about that. I figured i'd be of some help, by providing my insight.
I was basically saying that the number of crushes u get decreases as you get older, if you are > 30 (seems like a good estimate for me) and that the number of crushes increases as you get older, if you are < 15.
in between, there has to be a point, where you have a constant number of crushes...
It's concave down, is what i am trying to say, with a peak somewhere between 15-30. |
|
|
| PatMcGroin |
| quote: | Originally posted by Sunshine79
GUYS!!!!!! didn't f0x tell you!??!
i am _dense_
|
so am i!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :toothless |
|
|
| decibel08 |
| quote: | Originally posted by drizzt81
d(Crushes)/dt (t>30 years) < 0
d(Crushes)/dt (t<15 years) > 0
d(Crushes)/dt (for some t in [15,30]) = 0
my oppinion :P |
i could agree with this, although it might help if you plotted it :D
but i think d(Crushes)/dt = 0 for ~t[12..marriage] (hopefully) or maybe for ~t[12..marriage#2]
i know i had crushes in middle school...
»danny«
omg daniela just referred to me as 'daniel' on the radio :o |
|
|
|
|
