return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 [260] 261 262 263 264 265 
The movie recommendations thread, son (pg. 260)
View this Thread in Original format
Zoso
We have another, stronger cold front coming this week, which should drop temps quite nicely. That means it's time for ye olde annual viewings of The Shining and The Fellowship of the Ring. The remastered Shining BD is a thing of beauty. I have the UHD disc as well, but I don't have a player yet. I gotta get on that now that we have a UHD TV with HDR and 10-bit color support. Come a long way since watching NSTC 480i broadcast as a kid.
Zoso
I'm sure all the movie buffs are aware, but just in case: https://ultrahd.highdefdigest.com/n...ember-1st/45490

If industry sources are true to their word, Weta Digital went back to the original camera negative (OCN) for all the live action shots (4K scan), and they did a 4K scan of the "film outs" for the VFX shots. All the VFX were rendered at 2K, then printed back to 35 mm film in what is called a "film out". So, those are locked at 2K, but they are still being scanned in at 4K, along with the rest of the 35 mm OCN.

If UHD BD is not your thing, Warner has also announced a remastered standard BD set coming in late 2021. Either way, I just hope to god they fixed the ty ass green tint color timing on the extended edition of Fellowship.
Zoso
We watched this (Who Killed Maria Marta?) last night and enjoyed it: https://www.netflix.com/title/81017110
tranceCDs
Bully



Never get tired of this classic.
Zoso
My UHDs of The Lord of the Rings shipped yesterday. Very much looking forward to those, especially the correction of the green tinted e color timing on Fellowship.
planetaryplayer
That trilogy is so good, but imo the hobbit films blow. I prefer the hobbit over lotr in book form but they ed up the movies so much. Dreaming of the day for a proper adaptation of the silmarillian. But back to LOTR— May be my personal favourite movie of all time (counting them as one). I might watch them again since your post. I have pillows with maps of middle earth
Zoso
quote:
Originally posted by planetaryplayer
That trilogy is so good, but imo the hobbit films blow. I prefer the hobbit over lotr in book form but they ed up the movies so much. Dreaming of the day for a proper adaptation of the silmarillian. But back to LOTR— May be my personal favourite movie of all time (counting them as one). I might watch them again since your post. I have pillows with maps of middle earth


I enjoy the Hobbit trilogy only because it's an excuse to spend more time in Middle Earth. But, yes, LOTR blows it away. The new UHD discs are a sight to behold, apparently, so I am really looking forward to them!

https://thedigitalbits.com/item/lor...ogy-2020-4k-uhd
planetaryplayer
I’ll definitely need to buy a 4K tv if just to watch it. I’ll probably watch the hobbit sometime again but I only own the first one, why they stretched it out over three films is beyond me. I downloaded tenet, not too much expectations on it.
Zoso
quote:
Originally posted by planetaryplayer
I’ll definitely need to buy a 4K tv if just to watch it. I’ll probably watch the hobbit sometime again but I only own the first one, why they stretched it out over three films is beyond me. I downloaded tenet, not too much expectations on it.


I am raging Nolan fanboi, so I'll get the UHD/BD combo as soon as it's out. I'm sure it's over pretentious gobbeldy gook to the masses, but I don't care. I love his films.
planetaryplayer
Only reason it got me interested is Nolan! Hoping it has some inception like magic that captures me but I’ve read mixed reviews.

Zoso
quote:
Originally posted by planetaryplayer
Only reason it got me interested is Nolan! Hoping it has some inception like magic that captures me but I’ve read mixed reviews.


Agreed. With Nolan, I always see the mixed reviews and say, ", I'll for me own opinion, thanks" and I have yet to be disappointed. He will eventually let me down, that's just life and statistics, but I shall enjoy the ride in the meantime. The fact that I got the wife to no only watch but actually enjoy Interstellar is a testament to Nolan's narrative ability. Initially she was all "ewww, sci-fi" but I explained that although there is sci-fi in the film, it's actually mostly our modern understanding of physics, but the entire heart and soul of the movie is "how far would you go, as a parent, to protect/save your child/family?" It's a family drama, just played out on a grand scale. That sold her and she loved it.
planetaryplayer
my girlfriend won't watch sci-fi at all. it might be my favourite genre, but it can't be like star wars or some stupid crap. was just at the liquor store and there was a wine called 'inception' almost bought it too but it was too sweet for keto
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 [260] 261 262 263 264 265 
Privacy Statement