return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 [130] 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 
so did McCain just blow it? (pg. 130)
View this Thread in Original format
Sukhoi29SU
quote:
Originally posted by RJT
Alright, I'll bite. What, specifically, about them?

Ask me a pointed question and you'll get your answer.


I'd like to know why you two thought that what she said about hydrocarbons was out of context, and incorrect
delobbo
quote:
Originally posted by UWM
How can anybody possibly believe she performed better than Biden?

Honestly!

ing jokes. She's such a snarky condescening snatch. I hope anyone with an education can see that.

looks
woscar99
quote:
Originally posted by Sukhoi29SU
I think they were particularly impressed with her words about hydrocarbons.

Any input about that?


And I'm still waiting your input about my question. Does being captured in war demonstrate that you know how to win it?
RJT
quote:
Originally posted by Sukhoi29SU
I'd like to know why you two thought that what she said about hydrocarbons was out of context, and incorrect


What is it that she said that you would like explained for you?

You can pass off your own ignorance to a point, but if you don't even know or understand the question you're asking, why should I bother answering?

To be honest, I think you're playing fast and loose and would like to see how far you'll push it. :)
UWM
quote:
Originally posted by Sukhoi29SU
I'd like to know why you two thought that what she said about hydrocarbons was out of context, and incorrect


"Hydrocarbons" is a very vague buzzword.

It's not technically out of context.

Anything containing a carbon chain with hydrogen substituents is a hydrocarbon. So .. oils, fuels, etc are hydrocarbons.

So are the building blocks of human life.

Broad scope there, huh.
Ted Promo
her peppiness, it slays.
Sukhoi29SU
quote:
Originally posted by woscar99
And I'm still waiting your input about my question. Does being captured in war demonstrate that you know how to win it?


I chose not to respond to your question because it is so completely ing ridiculous.. it actually pisses me off.
In war, lives are lost and people are captured. It's unfortunate. War is unfortunate, but it's sometimes necessary.
John McCain being shot down and captured when he was a young fighter pilot has absolutely no relevance to his ability to lead this country now.
Where was Obama during that time? Kenya?

you.
RJT
And for the record, this is what she said:

quote:
So even in dealing with climate change, it's all the more reason that we have an "all of the above" approach, tapping into alternative sources of energy and conserving fuel, conserving our petroleum products and our hydrocarbons so that we can clean up this planet and deal with climate change.


"Conserving our hydrocarbons" does not compute. Any idiot who understands what a hydrocarbon is should get that, unfortunately I'm certain there are many "any idiots."
RJT
quote:
Originally posted by UWM
"Hydrocarbons" is a very vague buzzword.

It's not technically out of context.


The notion of needing to conserve them was - at least I thought so.

It's like saying "We need to conserve matter, because we need matter to do things."
delobbo
from an (ex)-Palin supporter at another board Im on:

quote:
First half Palin did pretty well, however, the second half she ignored the questions that she did not know how to answer and basically repeated everything she said in the beginning. Im for McCain but after realizing how incredibly stupid Pailin is I probably will skip the vote this year :thumbsup: Biden knew what he was talking about even though I didn't agree with anything said.

Sukhoi29SU
quote:
Originally posted by UWM
"Hydrocarbons" is a very vague buzzword.

It's not technically out of context.

Anything containing a carbon chain with hydrogen substituents is a hydrocarbon. So .. oils, fuels, etc are hydrocarbons.

So are the building blocks of human life.

Broad scope there, huh.


I agree. It wasn't used out of context. You were quick to write that she should "go back to grade school", however. I didn't understand why.
jupiterone
SUCH A MAVERICK
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 [130] 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 
Privacy Statement