return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 
so did McCain just blow it? (pg. 52)
View this Thread in Original format
UWM
Please keep going. This is entertaining.
Lebezniatnikov
Wow, I need a shower after sorting through two pages of that .
Zild
quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
That makes you "qualified" to talk about politics?

:conf:


Probably not. Guess I'm going to have to get a degree in politics so I can be able to talk about it on teh internetz.
Lebezniatnikov
I can only laugh whenever the "Obama isn't bipartisan" line comes up - I worked for a Republican Senator (gasp - that takes away The17sss's "far left liberal" argument, doesn't it?) for some time who frankly adored Obama... and sought out his co-sponsorship on many a bill.
Zild
quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
I can only laugh whenever the "Obama isn't bipartisan" line comes up - I worked for a Republican Senator (gasp - that takes away The17sss's "far left liberal" argument, doesn't it?) for some time who frankly adored Obama... and sought out his co-sponsorship on many a bill.


Obama isn't far left just like McCain isn't a right wing nutjob. They're both respectable human beings.
MrJiveBoJingles
quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
That makes you "qualified" to talk about politics?

:conf:

I think a lot of people are under an illusion that if they have some kind of high "general intelligence" as demonstrated by technical degrees, it somehow makes it more likely that their opinions about politics will be cogent instead of stupid nonsense.
RJT
quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
And I love how people bring up their degrees even if they're entirely irrelevant to the topic under discussion.

Uh, yeah, your knowledge of engineering or biology or quantum physics surely guarantees that you'll be informed when talking about the presidential campaign!

:conf:


Is that not effectively what the post of mine that you quoted said?

:conf:

Edit: Actually, I didn't read your post correctly and subsequently made an arse of myself. :(
Lebezniatnikov
quote:
Originally posted by Zild
Probably not. Guess I'm going to have to get a degree in politics so I can be able to talk about it on teh internetz.


I don't care what your degree is in so long as you can support your arguments and think logically (which you can) - but to use an MA in environmental engineering as an actual reason why we should somehow take him more seriously? Um, ok - I don't follow him on that one.
Zild
quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
I think a lot of people are under an illusion that if they have some kind of high "general intelligence" as demonstrated by technical degrees, it somehow makes it more likely that their opinions about politics will be cogent instead of stupid nonsense.


Usually when you score in the top 1 percentile on everything your whole life it leads you to believe that your opinions about politics will be more cogents than say the other 99% of the people below you. So I can see how that is misleading since politics is full of and doesn't follow your normal ideas of logical reasoning or cause and effect.
Zild
quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
I don't care what your degree is in so long as you can support your arguments and think logically (which you can) - but to use an MA in environmental engineering as an actual reason why we should somehow take him more seriously? Um, ok - I don't follow him on that one.


I think he was just getting defensive there at being called an idiot and was having a knee jerk reaction. I know it has happened to me before and I apologize.

Lebezniatnikov
quote:
Originally posted by Zild
I think he was just getting defensive there at being called an idiot and was having a knee jerk reaction. I know it has happened to me before and I apologize.


Meh, I've never had a problem with you at least. You may be a science nerd, but you can generally support your own opinions. :p
MrJiveBoJingles
quote:
Originally posted by Zild
Usually when you score in the top 1 percentile on everything your whole life it leads you to believe that your opinions about politics will be more cogents than say the other 99% of the people below you. So I can see how that is misleading since politics is full of and doesn't follow your normal ideas of logical reasoning or cause and effect.

No, it's misleading in another way: a person who devotes a lot of his time to serious intellectual study in science or wherever can still easily have half-assed, ill-formed ideas about things that he hasn't thought much about, such as politics.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 
Privacy Statement