return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 
so did McCain just blow it? (pg. 36)
View this Thread in Original format
UWM
quote:
Originally posted by RJT
It doesn't count if you had the TV on mute and your dick in your hand the whole time.


Maybe that's why I found it so painful. I just realized I forgot to lube up first.
MeLLyMeL
quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
hahaha, ok Mel, what about him? Pony up here.

You're getting all of your information from obviously biased (and incorrect) sources. Your decision is your own, but basing it off of misinformation is just comical to the rest of us.
Well if i'm wrong tell me. I don't have a major problem with this. I just think he helped fund those low income houses and with tax payer money. Lots of it. :\


This isn't the main reason why I *generally* vote republican. I'm sorry but yes I am a one stance above the rest, voter. I know it's bad. I'll admit it! Even my dad may be voting on the other side so that's why I'm not too sure about Florida. ;\
Ted Promo
quote:
Originally posted by RJT
It doesn't count if you had the TV on mute and your dick in your hand the whole time.


I tried it for Biden but for some reason his face kept reminding that I wanted Taco Bell :/
RJT
To quote the great philosopher, Jenna Jameson:

quote:
Don't use lube, use spit.


:gsmile:
enydo
quote:
Originally posted by Ted Promo
I tried it for Biden but for some reason his face kept reminding that I wanted Taco Bell :/


Let's go.
Ted Promo
Oh, so I could've used my taco as lube. Well that's a humdunger.
Lebezniatnikov
quote:
Originally posted by RJT
The difference is that the Republican Party is doing it here, not the media.

The Democrats haven't said a ing thing about Palin's daughter.


The media isn't even doing it!!!

This is straight out of the GOP playbook - cast Palin as a victim so she can be a redemptive figure for insulted women everywhere.

quote:
Either McCain's vetting process was a complete sham. Or his press operation is the worst in modern presidential politics history. Or some unholy blend of both.

Campbell Brown isn't the story - people are underestimating her, as they always have. No, the story is that Tucker Bounds went on national television without material to answer what is maybe the simplest, most straightforward follow-up question any reporter can ask: "What's your evidence for that assertion?" And I suspect that the reason they canceled Larry King is not to punish CNN (it doesn't work that way) it's that they still couldn't come up with an answer to the question by the time his show aired.

Now look at this comment from McCain honcho Steve Schmidt to Katie Couric last night: "Members of this campaign went to off-the-record lunches with reporters today, and they were asked if she would do paternity tests to prove paternity for her last child. Smear after smear after smear, and it's disgraceful and it's wrong. And the American people are going to reject it overwhelmingly when they see her."

First of all, that's the first time I've heard anyone in the campaign/political press throw out the notion of paternity tests. So Schmidt is to blame for bringing that issue into the mainstream. If anyone is smearing the candidate, it's Schmidt. This is as cynical a tactic as I've ever seen in politics.

Secondly, how can it be a "smear" if it was during an off the record lunch with McCain campaign aides?

Thirdly, hey, colleagues, you're on notice: Steve Schmidt does not respect "off the record." Watch your backs, my friends.


Who are the bad guys here? The media? Why, for asking questions and DOING THEIR JOB? Nobody called them out when they asked questions about Rezko or Rev. Wright. Why is the rash decision by McCain to choose a running-mate with no national issue experience not fair game for scrutiny? Instead they go around planting stories about Bristol and then crying foul about the way its reported.
Renzo
, some Taco Bell right now would be awesome. Adam, bring me some.
Ted Promo
I meant humdinger, but that worked out quite well in hindsight.
Ted Promo
...and humdunger is what brings a certain pause to this thread...

RJT
I'm just sad HST isn't around to comment on this whole rigamarole - this seems like it would have been brilliant fodder for him.

I've been on a rampant HST binge the past month and it's scary to read the stuff he wrote in 88 about Biden's presidential bid - and how eerily similar the tone he took then seems to map onto how I feel about the current election.

Edit: Babies come out of vagina's unless it's a c-section or an abortion.

Edit 2: Wait, scratch abortions from that last edit.
Ted Promo
quote:
Originally posted by Renzo
, some Taco Bell right now would be awesome. Adam, bring me some.


Dude, we still need to chillbat. Right when I get done with being a pow in Hanoi.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 
Privacy Statement