|
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 106)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| culorut |
| quote: | | Might as well beat your skull in with a spanner if you're gonna debate a troll. |
LOL, no just waiting for them to post another steel skyscraper that collapsed due to fires the same way WTC7 did. They can talk all they want but they still have not found one.
The Windsor Building in Madrid burned much longer and reached much higher temperatures then WTC7 did. (800 Degrees Celsius/1,472 F)
This building did not collapse. :eyes:
All buildings are built differently but if fires did demolish WTC7 then everyone working or living in a steel framed skyscraper should evacuate now. If these buildings are so easily demolished by fires why is no one rushing to fix the many thousands that already exist around the globe?
Fires? LOL. |
|
|
| Sunsnail |
| quote: | Originally posted by ogvh5150
We must remember that the average troll knows way more than the professional. |
that's new. |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | | no, but your "average troll" knows far more about comparing apples with oranges you ing halfwit. anyone see the differences here? |
You seem confused, I posted this information a short while back stating that the crash into the Empire State building was taken into consideration for when the trade towers where built. I did not say it was the same type of aircraft(s) that hit the WTC towers hence why I mentioned it was a B-25 in the first place. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
All buildings are built differently but if fires did demolish WTC7 then everyone working or living in a steel framed skyscraper should evacuate now. If these buildings are so easily demolished by fires why is no one rushing to fix the many thousands that already exist around the globe? |
because the specific structural design of the WTCs are different from most other buildings. sheesh, how long is it gonna take you people to grasp this simple fact????
versus
idiots.
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Fires? LOL. |
interesting you guys always post a picture from the opposite face that took all the damage from the collapses of 1&2. how would you expect either building to "reach around" to damage the non-facing side? :haha: :haha:
yeah, no fires at all :rolleyes:
edit: anyone gonna respond to colonelcrisp?? |
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | | because the specific structural design of the WTCs are different from most other buildings. sheesh, how long is it gonna take you people to grasp this simple fact???? |
Actually we do understand this, much better than you.
Worst photochop ever. Please stop using debunking 9/11 sites, they have been debunked. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
Please stop using debunking 9/11 sites, they have been debunked. |
then why are you still repeating the same lies and falsehoods? wheres the chop child?? :rolleyes: |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
oh look, video of the fires. did they chop that too?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U
| quote: |
This video shows a large rip in the south side of building 7 before it collapsed. Evidence the building was far more damaged than conspiracy theorists suggest. Note the smoke coming directly from the rip and not building 6 as conspiracy theorists suggest. At 1:33 Min into the video someone says (Firefighters and police were the only ones allowed in the area so it is most likely a firefighter or policeman) "Look at the hole in that building... 7 world... that might come down". Anyone seeing this and suggesting no one knew the building was going to come down is lying. |
|
|
|
| culorut |
| quote: | | oh look, video of the fires. did they chop that too? |
Never said the fires where not present, the picture is incredibly fake just like you. :D |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
the picture is incredibly fake |
you have proof of this of course :rolleyes: |
|
|
| culorut |
| And you have provided evidence that another steel framed skyscraper has collapsed they way WTC7 did due to fires? (in history) :rolleyes: |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by culorut
And you have provided evidence that another steel framed skyscraper has collapsed they way WTC7 did due to fires? (in history) :rolleyes: |
wit. you merely assume that something is fake even though you have no proof. yet another example of your ilk's commitment to assessing evidence. go you!
and again, (even if) the fact that a building hasn't collapsed like WTC7 means nothing. the fact you can't even comprehend this is certainly part of the reason you don't understand and don't bother to respond to other people's arguments.
keep it up internet detective! you are far more capable to assess the structural integrity and collapse of WTC7 than all the structural engineers in the entire world. well done! |
|
|
| Fir3start3r |
omg, I can't believe this crap thread is STILL going on...
I like this explanation the best...
| quote: |
Whatever reason it may be that the government supposedly orchestrated this conspiracy, it must have been worth it to them to cause so much suffering and loss of life. So if there's any truth to this, then you can bet your ass that the government wouldn't let a couple of pecker-neck chumps with a couple of Macs and too much time on their hands jeopardise their entire operation by letting this stupid video float around on the Internet. I can picture you morons emailing me now: "BUT MADOX, MAYBE DYLAN POSTED IT ON THE INTERNET BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT HAD A CHANCE TO REMOVE IT LOL." Yeah, too bad this rebuttal is inconsistent with the premise of Dylan's sh*t-festival of a movie: that the WTC was brought down "in a carefully planned and controlled demolition ... and it was pulled off with military precision." Now we're expected to believe that the same government that was able to commit the largest terrorist operation in history--with military precision no less--is suddenly too incompetent to sniff out and shut down a little website set up by some college losers within days, if not minutes of its creation? The US government has the capability to monitor every electronic communication made anywhere in the world, yet we're expected to believe that they wouldn't be able to nix this kid long before his video ever became popular?
I win. There is no conspiracy
|
|
|
|
|
|
