return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 [218] 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 218)
View this Thread in Original format
culorut
Graeme MacQueen - 3.19.2008 - University of Waterloo

LazFX
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Graeme MacQueen - 3.19.2008 - University of Waterloo


culorut
Somehow I am willing to bet my left nut you did not even bother to watch the video.

One of the best ones to date which explains that the collapses where not caused from 2 aircraft and jet fuel.

Sorry, you failed. Miserably.
LazFX
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Somehow I am willing to bet my left nut you did not even bother to watch the video.

One of the best ones to date which explains that the collapses where not caused from 2 aircraft and jet fuel.

Sorry, you failed. Miserably.


yeah I did.....
and the guys credentials said what again??


yeah :rolleyes:
culorut
The guy has a PHD which makes him smarter then most structural engineers by far. This also includes every last person who has posted in this thread vouching for the official story.

Far from what you would call a tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorist. He actually makes sense, very good sense at that.

He explains in the most simple terms throughout the lecture that the official story is a fairy tale. You do not even need half a brain to figure it out, that is the point.

I do not expect most of you official story believers around here to believe it as most do not even have claim to that minimum half of a brain needed to understand this in the first place.
LazFX
honestly dude,,,,,

they give out Phds like Ritalin these days...... oh.... i see, you don't have one??

sheeesh.... :rolleyes:
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
The guy has a PHD which makes him smarter then most structural engineers by far. This also includes every last person who has posted in this thread vouching for the official story.

Far from what you would call a tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorist. He actually makes sense, very good sense at that.

He explains in the most simple terms throughout the lecture that the official story is a fairy tale. You do not even need half a brain to figure it out, that is the point.

I do not expect most of you official story believers around here to believe it as most do not even have claim to that minimum half of a brain needed to understand this in the first place.


So why, if he's so damned smart and PhD worthy, hasn't he produced a proper scientific paper to validate his argument? He can spew hot air all he wants and it’ll still be irrelevant.

Still waiting for that peer-reviewed paper that provides scientific analysis supporting controlled demolition (and in a real journal or magazine, not some third-rate public access vanity journal either einstein).

oh, that's right. he's a religious studies scholar. he sure knows how to talk about engineering then im sure! :stongue:
jerZ07002
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
The guy has a PHD which makes him smarter then most structural engineers by far.


what about a structural engineer with a PHD?
colonelcrisp
quote:
Originally posted by jerZ07002
what about a structural engineer with a PHD?
a PHD is only relevant if it is in the context of your field of expertise. ie a structural engineer with a phd in FEA (finite element analysis) would be very relevant, whereas a guy with a Phd in theology knows about as much about structural engineering as a 2 year old.
LazFX
quote:
Originally posted by colonelcrisp
a PHD is only relevant if it is in the context of your field of expertise. ie a structural engineer with a phd in FEA (finite element analysis) would be very relevant, whereas a guy with a Phd in theology knows about as much about structural engineering as a 2 year old.


I was going to tell him I have a PHD in OBMF.....


;)

XaNaX
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Graeme MacQueen - 3.19.2008 - University of Waterloo




culorut
Wow another 4-5 replies from the usual suspects who simply attack instead of debating the actual content that a professional is addressing in a highly respected university.

Go figure.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 [218] 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 
Privacy Statement