|
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 335)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by iTranscendence
molten steel |
lols. I see this conversation is pointless (gee, what a shock!!). I can’t believe that after all these years, you ing idiots are still harping on about molten steel.
, I’d feel sorry for you if you weren’t such a dishonest wit.
Goodnight. |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by iTranscendence
Is there anything in particular that you would like to discuss with me about it? |
Let's approach this like we'r in a court of law.
1) Who are you indicting?
2) What charges are you filing?
3) What evidence do you bring before the court to prove the accused committed the crime for which you are accusing them of?
We'll go one by one. One defendant. One charge. Evidence for that charge. |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by iTranscendence
There were giant marble slabs blown across the lobby when the firefighters got in there and there is film of it from the french documentary producers who were with the FDNY Unit on the morning of 9/11. |
The film is only as good as those who filmed big foot or UFOs. It proves NOTHING.
| quote: | | Furthermore there has been plenty of eyewitness testimony to the massive amounts of molten steel by the firefighters as well, one went so far as to call it a molten foundry. But I'm sure you believe that refined kerosene (jet fuel) could actually cause something like that to happen. Or even more preposterously, actually believe the friction of the building falling; of which there was very little could actually cause massive amounts of steel to melt. Steel that stayed molten underneath ground zero and was in excess of 1300 degrees at some points in the rubble from heat maps taken by NASA satellites 4 weeks later. |
The onus is on you to prove explosives were used. Not us to prove they weren't there.
1) Who set the explosives?
2) How did they hide the tonnes of explosives needed?
3) Who managed such a complex operation?
4) Who ordered it?
5) Why fly planes into the building if the conspiracy planned a demolition? |
|
|
| iTranscendence |
| quote: | Originally posted by Krypton
Let's approach this like we'r in a court of law.
1) Who are you indicting?
2) What charges are you filing?
3) What evidence do you bring before the court to prove the accused committed the crime for which you are accusing them of? |
Well I think I would first start with another investigation, one that didn't have key players in positions to control the flow of information like phillip zellikow was on the first commission. I mean, we investigated pearl harbor like 9 times.
This should be done to answer a list of legitimate questions the victims families still have.
http://911independentcommission.org/questions.html
I believe there is ample evidence to show criminal negligence by several governmental agencies regarding 9/11. Including but not limited to:
The destruction of 2.5 terabytes of data of operation able danger, which had been surveying mohammed atta for at least 18 months. (if you want to debate if you should believe shaffer or the FBI that's another debate)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9342936/
Key evidence that was destroyed by the FAA
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/w...6¬Found=true
The censured testimony of nomran mineta the transportation secretary, from the final commission report.
All the testimonies of the NSWBC (National Security Whistleblowers Coalition). Yes, thats right there is an entire group of whistle blowers who are screaming criminal negligence.
http://www.nswbc.org/Press%20Releases/NSWBC-911Comm.htm
I believe once full proceedings were underway the full extent of what has happened will come to light, but that's all you need to get your foot in the door. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by iTranscendence
I believe there is ample evidence to show criminal negligence by several governmental agencies regarding 9/11. |
its funny how they dance and weave between "OMG bush planted bombs in the towers" to "criminal negligence for not stopping the attacks". lols.
its the same with cretinrot, who thinks no plane hit the pentagon AND that cheney gave a "stand down" order not to shoot the plane that crashed into the pentagon.
I also wanna know who is left to conduct this investigation, since the thousand of government and private sector employees are so obviously “in on it”. Who is left to investigate? Haha.
love their logic :stongue: |
|
|
| iTranscendence |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
its funny how they dance and weave between "OMG bush planted bombs in the towers" to "criminal negligence for not stopping the attacks". lols.
its the same with cretinrot, who thinks no plane hit the pentagon AND that cheney gave a "stand down" order not to shoot the plane that crashed into the pentagon.
love their logic :stongue: |
Leave this discussion to the big boys, thanks kid. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by iTranscendence
Leave this discussion to the big boys, thanks kid. |
I am older than you, have far better qualifications, and quite obviously would thrash you in any measure of logic and deduction anyone could mention, child.
Its not my fault you’re a conspiracy wackjob lacking a proper education. Don’t be jealous, not everyone can afford to go to school. Im sure you’re good at other things. |
|
|
| iTranscendence |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
I am older than you, have far better qualifications, and quite obviously would thrash you in any measure of logic and deduction anyone could mention, child.
Its not my fault you’re a conspiracy wackjob lacking a proper education. Don’t be jealous, not everyone can afford to go to school. Im sure you’re good at other things. |
You definitely make an amazing logical case based on deductive reasoning, your skills of debate and persuasion are above reproach.
:rolleyes: |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by iTranscendence
You definitely make an amazing logical case based on deductive reasoning, your skills of debate and persuasion are above reproach.
:rolleyes: |
Pig-ignorant, dishonest conspiracy nutjobs are beneath me. What is this, a new member joins, wants a new investigation, posts a bunch of crap we’ve all seen 100 times before, and expects us to waste time with his disingenuous bollocks? Puh-lease.
I took the chance that maybe you were different and asked you about the fire fighter quotes, and all I got in return was the same ignorant, pathetic drivel. Having been putting up with people like you for the last ~5 years I know when there’s an idiot afoot. Why waste time when I could just mock you? these debates never get anywhere because you CTers are ing morons. |
|
|
| Krypton |
| quote: | Originally posted by iTranscendence
Well I think I would first start with another investigation, one that didn't have key players in positions to control the flow of information like phillip zellikow was on the first commission. I mean, we investigated pearl harbor like 9 times.
This should be done to answer a list of legitimate questions the victims families still have.
http://911independentcommission.org/questions.html
I believe there is ample evidence to show criminal negligence by several governmental agencies regarding 9/11. Including but not limited to:
The destruction of 2.5 terabytes of data of operation able danger, which had been surveying mohammed atta for at least 18 months. (if you want to debate if you should believe shaffer or the FBI that's another debate)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9342936/
Key evidence that was destroyed by the FAA
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/w...6¬Found=true
The censured testimony of nomran mineta the transportation secretary, from the final commission report.
All the testimonies of the NSWBC (National Security Whistleblowers Coalition). Yes, thats right there is an entire group of whistle blowers who are screaming criminal negligence.
http://www.nswbc.org/Press%20Releases/NSWBC-911Comm.htm
I believe once full proceedings were underway the full extent of what has happened will come to light, but that's all you need to get your foot in the door. |
Unfortunately, that's not what I asked you. Before you say anything, please clarify your position. Is the government responsible for carrying out 9/11, or simply guilty of a massive national security failure? |
|
|
| iTranscendence |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
Pig-ignorant, dishonest conspiracy nutjobs are beneath me. What is this, a new member joins, wants a new investigation, posts a bunch of crap we’ve all seen 100 times before, and expects us to waste time with his disingenuous bollocks? Puh-lease.
I took the chance that maybe you were different and asked you about the fire fighter quotes, and all I got in return was the same ignorant, pathetic drivel. Having been putting up with people like you for the last ~5 years I know when there’s an idiot afoot. Why waste time when I could just mock you? these debates never get anywhere because you CTers are ing morons. |
Don't give me that you gave me a chance bull, you came at me like a bulldog as soon as I posted, there was no discourse with you, it was you, immediately attacking me, I think the only one who needs to see a shrink here is you. |
|
|
| iTranscendence |
| quote: | Originally posted by Krypton
Unfortunately, that's not what I asked you. Before you say anything, please clarify your position. Is the government responsible for carrying out 9/11, or simply guilty of a massive national security failure? |
The latter for sure, the former is less concrete, but I think with further investigation could be proven in a court of law. |
|
|
|
|
