return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 [282] 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 282)
View this Thread in Original format
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by mndeg
Anyone care to explain why they found physical evidence of thermate at WTC 7?


there was no evidence of thermate found. unfortunately you seem to believe everything steven jones tells you. how dumb.

quote:
Originally posted by mndeg
Or why there was molten steels for 2 months at the remains of a building that was 200 yrds from the building with the plane in it?


there wasn't any molten steel (another fallacy), and even if there were, having it "molten" for two months after the collapses is not an indication of thermite. which you would know if you knew how thermite worked, but alas.

grow up, child.
Krypton
quote:
Originally posted by mndeg
Of course there's evidence, why would I say something otherwise? Because I hate America and freedom? LOL

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?f...ideoID=26949287

NIST was a crippled investigation, I believe a former CIA director said we should go back and reinvestigate.

http://www.inteldaily.com/news/126/...2009-02-07.html
--

btw i'm talking about wtc 7, you know the one that didn't have the plane in it but still exploded.


I never said you hate America or freedom, so let's not resort to throwing around straw mans. His evidence is...a tiny piece of iron, which he assumed comes from a thermite reaction. So how does he determine that iron comes from a thermite reaction, and not simply a component of the building itself. He doesn't. This "visual evidence" from the towers could be many other things than a thermite reaction. You know, a plane loaded with thousands of gallons of jet fuel hit the building, SURPRISE! His theory has more holes than swiss cheese.

So, how is a CIA guy advocating a new investigation any evidence whatsoever of a conspiracy. It isn't. I'm all for an independent investigation, but don't trump this as if it proves something.
mndeg
hi, i'm still talking about the building without the plane in it. and yes there was evidence of thermite.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/residues.html#incendiary_residues
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evi...urgy/index.html
Joss Weatherby
quote:
Originally posted by mndeg
hi, i'm still talking about the building without the plane in it. and yes there was evidence of thermite.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evi...urgy/index.html



Why would US news organizations not pick up on this? Why would international news organizations not pick up on this?

You know some of the biggest and most damaging stories against the US government have been picked up and released by major news organizations?

This is complete insanity that you would take some random group of people who have no experience in architecture, material sciences, physics, or anything related to how a building is built, maintained, or demolished over a group of people that DO have that experience.

WTC 7 collapsed due to poor design of its fire suppression system, massive structural damage to its south face and most likely the collapse of a critical supporting column that caused an immediate and severe re-distribution of its weight across the rest of the damaged and weakened building.
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by mndeg
hi, i'm still talking about the building without the plane in it. and yes there was evidence of thermite.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evi...ndiary_residues
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evi...urgy/index.html


LOL!

Posting anything from those frauds hardly helps your position! :haha: Your "evidence" has been debunked over, and over, and over again! Why do you keep coming back and telling lies?
mndeg
And how much international news do you watch? Do you really think that's something fox news would cover? REALLY? The government was already caught paying retired generals to cheerlead for the iraq war.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSLgC4cTKcs
mndeg
It hasn't been debunked, unless you can prove so the argument ends here right now.
quote:

This is complete insanity that you would take some random group of people who have no experience in architecture, material sciences, physics, or anything related to how a building is built, maintained, or demolished over a group of people that DO have that experience.

False.
Joss Weatherby
quote:
Originally posted by mndeg
And how much international news do you watch? Do you really think that's something fox news would cover? REALLY?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSLgC4cTKcs


Thats not an example, and I never mentioned Fox News.

How is a CNN interview of a Pakistani General any sort of credible source of information?

Pakistand is knee-deep in due to al-Queda and have always been known to shift blame away from themselves. God forbid they are now harboring the people that were involved in planning this attack!
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by mndeg
It hasn't been debunked, unless you can prove so the argument ends here right now.


this was dealt with more than 2 years ago. go find the information yourself you ing lazy, ignorant moron.
Joss Weatherby
quote:
Originally posted by mndeg
It hasn't been debunked, unless you can prove so the argument ends here right now.


If you can't tell me why exactly this attack was carried out by the United States then this discussion ends right here, right now.

And why does this conspiracy have to be so ing complicated? Thermite, planted explosives, missiles on planes?

Why cant you take it that buildings collapse when really bad happens to them?

Cant the conspiracy be "US trained suicide attackers hi-jacked plane"???

mndeg
Why was Pearl Harbor allowed to be bombed even when the japanese code was cracked long before?

quote:

This is complete insanity that you would take some random group of people who have no experience in architecture, material sciences, physics, or anything related to how a building is built, maintained, or demolished over a group of people that DO have that experience.

this is completely false.

if you aren't willing to talk facts, this is pointless. a complete waste of time. it's like trying to argue jesus exists because you say he speaks to you and "God is good".
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by mndeg
Why was Pearl Harbor allowed to be bombed even when the japanese code was cracked long before?


ohhhhhh. i see. you're really one of those. i'd pity you if you weren't so willfully ignorant and dishonest :haha:
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 [282] 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 
Privacy Statement