Rockefellers caused jews who caused evolution which caused 9/11!
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
the only people that think there's are "thousands" of things wrong with the official story look like this
How original, here's one that describes your kind to the tee....
I bet you really do look like that. LOL
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
I'm getting a little tired of the way the [CTer] switches back and forth between demolition charges and thermite depending on which piece of evidence is being discussed.
"Squibs," "freefall speed," "debris ejected sideways," and "some people heard explosions" is all cited as evidence of demolition charges blowing apart the WTC.
BUT....."molten steel," Steven Jones' microspheres, and the lack of loud CD charges on audio of the collapses is "proof" of thermite!
Sometimes I see truthers switch between the two in mid-senetence - as Richard Gage did in a CFRB radio debate when I pointed out how the usual sounds of a CD were not heard or recorded. "That's cuz they used thermite....and people heard explosions."
So let's clear this up once and for all: is it bombs or thermite?
It can't be both. If your position (like Gage's) is that thermite was used because bombs are too loud then say goodbye to all those "explosive" talking points because none of that could be caused by silent explosives.
If it's bombs you believe in then stop with the "molten steel" and Steven Jones.
Originally posted by culorut
How original, here's one that describes your kind to the tee....
I bet you really do look like that. LOL
what is it you do on here again? o yeah i remember, propagate lies, plant seeds of doubt and personally attack established members......:rolleyes:
culorut
I call bull, and anyone following this thread knows dam well between you and PKC the picture I posted fits the both of you like a glove.
Seriously fuk off you trolls.
colonelcrisp
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
I call bull, and anyone following this thread knows dam well between you and PKC the picture I posted fits the both of you like a glove.
Seriously fuk off you trolls.
hrmmm my account was created in 2003.... yours in 2007.... who is established? furthermore what you seem to think is compelling evidence is nothing but irrefutable proof that you had major difficulty putting square pegs through round holes as a child.... you wouldnt know a good fit if it bit you in the arse while you were crouched under a bridge eating children........:whip:
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by colonelcrisp
hrmmm my account was created in 2003.... yours in 2007.... who is established? furthermore what you seem to think is compelling evidence is nothing but irrefutable proof that you had major difficulty putting square pegs through round holes as a child.... you wouldnt know a good fit if it bit you in the arse while you were crouched under a bridge eating children........:whip:
And yet another compelling post from someone who has the credentials (supposedly) but still has not disproved the thousands of problems that are present in the official 9/11 story.
Good job troll, keep proving to others how you define what you are with every keystroke.
{b.s.e.}
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
And yet another compelling post from someone who has the credentials (supposedly) but still has not disproved the thousands of problems that are present in the official 9/11 story.
Good job troll, keep proving to others how you define what you are with every keystroke.
hi, long time listener, first time caller..
i don't understand why 3 different buildings all falling at free-fall speed (i.e. falling with gravity, as if no weight was underneath such a massive structure) didn't raise more eyebrows.
Q5echo
quote:
Originally posted by {b.s.e.}
i don't understand why 3 different buildings all falling at free-fall speed (i.e. falling with gravity, as if no weight was underneath such a massive structure) didn't raise more eyebrows.
when a few thousand tons of steel begins to fall, nothing will stop it.
the south tower:
you have it in your mind, instictively, to assume that the upper 1/3 of the building has little to do with the structural integrity of the lower 2/3's when, IN FACT, in a building like the WTC (a purely exoskeleton design) when the top of the building is no longer connected to the rest most if not all of the original integrity becomes non-existent.
National Geographic. at 1:40 begins the close-up shot the exoskeleton begins to buckle the instant prior to collapse:
{b.s.e.}
heh, fair enough. and building 7? pretty odd, i think.
Marvin Bush at the helm of security is also pretty curious.
The World Trade Center was destroyed just days after a heightened security alert was lifted at the landmark 110-story towers, security personnel said yesterday [September 11]. Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday [September 6], bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed.
