|
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 20)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| seval |
ive spent hours researching this and i came to the conclusion that the americian government was behind the attacks, the hole in the pentagon is a direct result of a missle attack due to the size of the hole and the lack of an airplane in pieces at the scene, the twin towers was a planned demolition if you look at the news coverage in slow motion you can see loads of explosions going off as the towers collapse not to mention it is impossibe for the structure of them buildings to collapse under such low temperaturs as steel has a melting point of over 2000 degrees and seeing as most of the fuel was burned in a giant fireball on impact it would of been impossible for the steel to melt especially as it only burnt for under an hour,
if you look at the footage of when george bush was told of the attack he nods his head and then gives a speech to school children not pahsed at all
and if you examine the fottage from people who caught the experience on video you can see the plane shoot missiles a split seccont before impact and the underside of the planes had been modified to carry the equipment |
|
|
| stevieboy32808 |
| quote: | Originally posted by seval
ive spent hours researching this and i came to the conclusion that the americian government was behind the attacks, the hole in the pentagon is a direct result of a missle attack due to the size of the hole and the lack of an airplane in pieces at the scene |
Almost. There were plane parts and I will address, at least this part, later. As for the rest of tiesto14's original questions I may answer those. |
|
|
| seval |
| quote: | Originally posted by stevieboy32808
Almost. There were plane parts and I will address, at least this part, later. As for the rest of tiesto14's original questions I may answer those. |
the only pieces of debre were that of a missle, part of the engine and part of the shell casing, both were too small to be part of a jumbo jet
when you look at the footage of the twin towers you can see a distinct outline of the planes that crashed into them, the pentagon had no such marks, also witneses said the plane hit the ground then crashed into the building, no such evidence was found to suggest a plane draged along the ground as the lawn was virtually un marked bar debrie from the explosion
im not usually one for conspiracy theorys but every thing the americian gevernment said was that was proven wrong leads me to believe that it would of been impossible for a terrorist group to do such a thing
but dont take the word of a skinny irish guy check out this video and see what you make of it
[[ LINK REMOVED ]]
|
|
|
| Lepanto |
| If the US gov't was behind this, no one here would know about it ;). |
|
|
| seval |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lepanto
If the US gov't was behind this, no one here would know about it ;). |
thats the thing blowin up two of the tallest buildings in the world and kill over 2000 people isnt exactly a good thing and not somthing you expect your government to do, if they come out and say 'we did it, we blew up the twin towers' do you think the americian people would jump with joy? i think not.
in a recent statment georege bush said 'we are a country addicted to oil' look at the countrys attacked by america, iraq one of the largest oil reservs in the world, afghanistan oil and gas, and next on the list iran.;) |
|
|
| Lepanto |
| the only thing in your reply that makes sense is iraq. afganistan was a retaliation to 9/11 and Iran won't be attacked by ONLY the US ;) |
|
|
| seval |
ok this is where you fall, your talking to someone who believes the americian government was behind the attacks so how could the invasion of afganistan be a retaliation if they wernt behind the attack
seccond of you look this up in an atlas you will find afganistan is directly beside iran this is a very good stratagic point to have over an oponent
third iran has many enemys just as every country does it just so happens isreal wants to blow them off the map at the same time america is trying to take over the world its more coincidence than planed:) |
|
|
| Marc Summers |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lepanto
the only thing in your reply that makes sense is iraq. afganistan was a retaliation to 9/11 and Iran won't be attacked by ONLY the US ;) |
Iraq wasn't attacked by only the US, what was that "Coalition" Bush kept talking about?
You know, he would be like, "coalition", and at the same time, do that hand gesture that he somehow figured symbolized coalition.
And Iran is crazy, I say we just send in those police rovers via remote control to do the work for us. |
|
|
| hardcore trancer |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lepanto
and Iran won't be attacked by ONLY the US ;) |
oh yes I forgot about the massive coalition behind them.:haha: |
|
|
| ogvh5150 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lepanto
If the US gov't was behind this, no one here would know about it ;). |
I think you're trying to say that those "in the know" would know what really happened on that Tuesday morning. Am I correct in that assumption?
| quote: | Originally posted by hardcore trancer
oh yes I forgot about the massive coalition behind them.:haha: |
You forgot Poland
GW Bush |
|
|
| ogvh5150 |
| quote: | Sunday, 23 September, 2001, 12:30 GMT 13:30 UK
Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well.
The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.
Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September.
His photograph was released, and has since appeared in newspapers and on television around the world.
Hijacking suspects
Flight 175: Marwan Al-Shehhi, Fayez Ahmed, Mohald Alshehri, Hamza Alghamdi and Ahmed Alghamdi
Flight 11: Waleed M Alshehri, Wail Alshehri, Mohamed Atta, Abdulaziz Alomari and Satam Al Suqami
Flight 77: Khalid Al-Midhar, Majed Moqed, Nawaq Alhamzi, Salem Alhamzi and Hani Hanjour
Flight 93: Ahmed Alhaznawi, Ahmed Alnami, Ziad Jarrahi and Saeed Alghamdi
Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco.
He told journalists there that he had nothing to do with the attacks on New York and Washington, and had been in Morocco when they happened. He has contacted both the Saudi and American authorities, according to Saudi press reports.
He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Daytona Beach in the United States, and is indeed the same Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI has been referring.
But, he says, he left the United States in September last year, became a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines and is currently on a further training course in Morocco.
Mistaken identity
Abdulaziz Al Omari, another of the Flight 11 hijack suspects, has also been quoted in Arab news reports.
He says he is an engineer with Saudi Telecoms, and that he lost his passport while studying in Denver.
Another man with exactly the same name surfaced on the pages of the English-language Arab News.
The second Abdulaziz Al Omari is a pilot for Saudi Arabian Airlines, the report says.
Meanwhile, Asharq Al Awsat newspaper, a London-based Arabic daily, says it has interviewed Saeed Alghamdi.
He was listed by the FBI as a hijacker in the United flight that crashed in Pennsylvania.
And there are suggestions that another suspect, Khalid Al Midhar, may also be alive.
FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.
Hijack 'suspects' alive and well |
|
|
|
| tiesto14 |
| quote: | Originally posted by seval
ok this is where you fall, your talking to someone who believes the americian government was behind the attacks so how could the invasion of afganistan be a retaliation if they wernt behind the attack |
So you dismiss Osama Bin Laden's blatant confession? Or was he working in tandem with the US? |
|
|
|
|
