|
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 34)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| metalgearsolid |
| quote: | Originally posted by Psionic
I believe it's spelled "grammar" :p |
Well, I couldn't see without my glasses. Thanks though.:thepirate |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
That is great you have been posting here longer than me, I'am impressed. You want to talk about grammer look above to yours. You are silly little boy. I didn't want to bother with fragmented sentences, but feel free to continue saying I have bad grammer skills compare to you. I laugh every time. Never has a PDD member made so many grammer errors until you post. Every time you are the only one who makes the most grammer errors of all the PDD members.
Every time you post another record(held by you previously) is broken by you for being blatantly ignorant, stupid, and unnecessarily beligerant. Not that I'am an angel I don't pretend to be one, though.
What makes me laugh are twats like you can only attack because you don't know or you are so retardely ill that you automatically dislike anybody who hasn't been on Ta for as long as you. Or you won't respect them until they kiss your ass. |
asides from the fact that i try not to use punctuation (when im at work using my proxy bypass \" & ' often end up with a / in the middle of the word) there is absolutely nothing wrong with what you have brought to my attention. once again youre showing your lack of education. and grammar doesnt have an 'e' in it, moron. even some of your corrections make no sense. what exactly is i'am?
'every time i post another record' ?
'retardely ill' ?
'equivilent' ?
'bad grammer skills compare to you' ?
i respect any user who can construct a reasonable argument. and people like you that dont even realise they cant, annoy me. i dont care how long youve been registered, was merely pointing out that your suggestion i only ever attack people (as opposed to arguments) is thoroughly untrue, and someone thats been posting here for more than 5 minutes would realise that. and to criticise my paragraph with your own diatribe filled with poor writing and spelling mistakes is just funny. the fact you cant see that though is merely sad.
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
But please do me a favor, no do us all a favor, before you want to talk down to someone make sure you are at least smarter, if not equilivant, than he is. |
:haha: without a doubt :haha: hope you hold on dearly to that highschool certificate. its the only one youll ever get. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
Well, I couldn't see without my glasses. Thanks though.:thepirate |
oh, for some reason your glasses make your spelling better? idiot. |
|
|
| metalgearsolid |
| Right, my point being that you make excuses for being a ing loser who rather debating a topic you make it your goal to attack someone. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
Right, my point being that you make excuses for being a ing loser who rather debating a topic you make it your goal to attack someone. |
firstly, you wanted to argue language and grammar with me. i debated that with you. you lost.
secondly, i attack YOU. and sometimes kapedan or purple et al. not EVERYBODY. think about that einstein. i attack YOU because you specifically annoy me with how you present your arguments. i show almost all users in the PDD plenty of respect, even admiration.
just coz i have given up on your ability to construct an argument doesnt mean ive lost respect for everyone else on here too.
are we on the same page now? |
|
|
| metalgearsolid |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
firstly, you wanted to argue language and grammar with me. i debated that with you. you lost. |
Just how did I lose? We are using standard MLA format. Are we not?
| quote: |
secondly, i attack YOU. and sometimes kapedan or purple et al. not EVERYBODY. think about that einstein. i attack YOU because you specifically annoy me with how you present your arguments. i show almost all users in the PDD plenty of respect even admiration. |
Admiration because you are gay? I thought so.
| quote: |
just coz i have given up on your ability to construct an argument doesnt mean ive lost respect for everyone else on here too. |
Oh, so you are lazy, should I be surprised with that?
| quote: | | are we on the same page now? |
Far from it. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
oh, and you havent answered my question regarding how exactly the US government is making a profit from the wars?
this is what im talking about- if you make such a statement you need to back it up with something called evidence, or sometimes logic. thats what a reasoned argument consists of.
otherwise youre just spurting bull. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
Just how did I lose? We are using standard MLA format. Are we not?
|
you tried to criticise what i had written, yet your paragraphs contained a littany of spelling and grammar/sentence construction errors. the fact you dont even realise this means that i won. youre a highschool gradute and you have a smaller command of the english language than i did when i was in primary school.
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
Admiration because you are gay? I thought so. |
oh, thats just genius! your parents would be proud. no, admiration becuase there are several people on here that (unlike you) have a strong command of logic and argument.
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
Oh, so you are lazy, should I be surprised with that? |
no, you just form poor arguments, with little or no logic, and glaring grammar/spelling errors.
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
Far from it. |
im not surprised. you dont even know how ordinary your ability in the PDD is. thats ok, im sure you have other skills. |
|
|
| skot_e |
| quote: | Originally posted by shaolin_Z
William Rodriquez, who were rescuing people from the buildings before they collapsed, all talking about bombs going off in the buildings |
Possibility of fire extinguishers being exposed to extreme heat? just a thought, what do you think. |
|
|
| metalgearsolid |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
oh, and you havent answered my question regarding how exactly the US government is making a profit from the wars?
this is what im talking about- if you make such a statement you need to back it up with something called evidence, or sometimes logic. thats what a reasoned argument consists of.
otherwise youre just spurting bull. |
| quote: | "Everybody there stands to make money the longer we're there," says Wilkins. "So that's why we refer to it as 'The War for Cheese.'"
|
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,201644,00.html
The way the Government makes money is by contracting their friends, giving them millions of dollars. Also, politicians can only invest in funds not individual stocks. If they had invested money in a defense fund they would have made a huge profit from war and the continueing of war and the likely prospect that there might be another war. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by metalgearsolid
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,201644,00.html
The way the Government makes money is by contracting their friends, giving them millions of dollars. Also, politicians can only invest in funds not individual stocks. If they had invested money in a defense fund they would have made a huge profit from war and the continueing of war and the likely prospect that there might be another war. |
um, so what youre telling me is that the US government carried out the most extraordinary & complicated conspiracy in history, so they could award some re-building/supply contracts to some of their 'friends' (friends you havent listed and shown connections with btw)?
and you dont seem to think that this is a slightly complicated means to make a small profit, and one fraught with so many difficulties??
i mean seriously, thats almost as ludicrous as it being a missile that struck the pentagon :rolleyes:
now, if you wanna argue we're there for oil supply reasons, thats a much better argument. oil is an important commodity after all. |
|
|
| metalgearsolid |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
you tried to criticise what i had written, yet your paragraphs contained a littany of spelling and grammar/sentence construction errors. the fact you dont even realise this means that i won. youre a highschool gradute and you have a smaller command of the english language than i did when i was in primary school.
|
No, they didn't. Just one word was spelled wrong and that was 'grammar'.
And yeah I'am sure your grammar skills were my equilivant while you were in primary school. You are in your late twenties and they still lack those of a primary student.
| quote: |
oh, thats just genius! your parents would be proud. no, admiration becuase there are several people on here that (unlike you) have a strong command of logic and argument.
|
People admire other individuals because they lack confidence in themselves and admiring a PDD member while not being a bad thing it isn't something to hold yourself highly.
| quote: | no, you just form poor arguments, with little or no logic, and glaring grammar/spelling errors.
|
Once, again you have a narrow minded vision of the way things will work.
| quote: | | im not surprised. you dont even know how ordinary your ability in the PDD is. thats ok, im sure you have other skills. |
Oddly, enough I won't be the one stuck at a deskjob. Just what is your "profession"? |
|
|
|
|
