Originally posted by culorut
27 year veterans of the CIA do not know anything about black ops or cover ups?
You are the ing idiot.
Idiot.
the fact you can't even see the illogical nature of your argument speaks volumes. youre merely pasting people's suspicions as fact. loser.
colonelcrisp
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Dr. Frank Legge from Australia continues his diligent efforts to reach the public regarding 9/11 issues with his paper on the collapse of WTC 7 sans math, in an article entitled: "9/11 – Proof of Explosive Demolition without Calculations"
There is at least one Aussie with some common sense.
phd in chemistry? are you kidding me? who is your next expert witness for your case? dr bubbles?
his whole "paper" (if i can even call it that) is about as organized and logical as a grade 8 essay....it is no more credible than your endless posting of youtube videos (which he seems to use as irrefutable evidence)
Capitalizt
just something else to muddy the waters here..
Can someone PLEASE explain the photo on the top-right? Ignore everything else on the page and explain that pic plz.
The spark of light on the left is the nose of the plane touching the WTC. There is no way this little impact had time to create a shockwave that blows out the other side of the building..
looks to me like preplanted explosives going off in that building, timed to coincide with the airplane strike (a simple RF proximity sensor could do this).
colonelcrisp
quote:
Originally posted by Capitalizt
just something else to muddy the waters here..
Can someone PLEASE explain the photo on the top-right? Ignore everything else on the page and explain that pic plz.
The spark of light on the left is the nose of the plane touching the WTC. There is no way this little impact had time to create a shockwave that blows out the other side of the building..
looks to me like preplanted explosives going off in that building, timed to coincide with the airplane strike (a simple RF proximity sensor could do this).
ok then professor smarty pants.... explain how the evil government was able to predict the exact point and floor of impact?
what do you think the odds are of a 727 being able to hit a building at precisely the right floor while travelling at upwards of 500 miles per hour?
im going to hazard a guess that you would have better luck winning the lottery 10 times in a row....
Omega_M
Let me hazard a guess. This is not a still photo. The plane was moving at a very high velocity. In this one single frame, the camera caught the plane as it was about to hit the left end, and over the duration of the frame, the plane crashed right through the building and was about to explode towards the other end of the building. The smoke you see is probably just milliseconds before the whole thing exploded. Sounds logical ?
Omega_M
It's actually quite likely that the plane exploded somewhere near the left end of the building. The pressure waves that developed, then traveled at supersonic speeds and out of the building walls.
I think this is the case because I did the math and it doesn't add up to what I said in my previous post. A plane cannot travel the distance of the WTC breadth within a frame, if it's traveling at the reported speed. Besides, the impact will abruptly change the speed so it cannot proceed with the same speed after the impact.
A commercial camera usually captures 24 frames per second. So one frame is about 0.0417 of a second. With the max speed given (it says between 500-800 kmph) the plane can only travel a distance of 9.3 meters in 0.0417 in free air. The width of the building is about 63 mts. If we assume that the plane traveled some distance into the building before exploding, it must atleast have traveled 10 meters or less (this is my guess, but it seems logical that the passenger plane cannot explode immediately on impact. It's not a missile. Or is it ? :eek: ) If you look at the frame, you see the smoke starting anywhere between 1/6th-1/4th of the distance of the breadth of WMC, from the left end.
So, the plane impacted the left side and exploded within 10 meters of the left end. The blast pressure waves traveled at supersonic speeds and ripped out the building. All of this happened within one frame and it got captured on the video. That is my best explanation of the event. :gsmile:
culorut
9/11 Commission Deception, Cheney’s Actions on 9/11, and Why He Should Testify Under Oath
don't you love culorut's technique in this thread? he won't stick around an actually argue any point in particular, just keeps posting nonsense ad nauseum.
ogvh5150
quote:
Originally posted by Trancer-X
It's getting LOUDER
No one has ever posted any "9/11 was a terrorist job" videos.
Just thought I'd point that out.
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
27 year veterans of the CIA do not know anything about black ops or cover ups?
You are the ing idiot.
Idiot.
Sunsnail
quote:
Originally posted by ogvh5150
Yeah seriously. I don't know why people keep bothering to argue with culorut.
Q5echo
quote:
Originally posted by ogvh5150
No one has ever posted any "9/11 was a terrorist job" videos.
Just thought I'd point that out.
would that make our side more legitimate?
Krypton
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
would that make our side more legitimate?
A direct response to the 911 conspiracy accusations would be nice..:)
I want to know who financed 911, because there is no credible report of how Osama was supposed to have financed the attack. Additionally, the one video the Bush admin claims shows Osama taking blame for the 911 attack actually shows a man resembling osama, but with a broad nose, unlike the slender nose of the real osama.
The Zeitgeist makes very VERY strong arguments, so if you can find a direct refutation of that one documentary, I'de be excited..:gsmile:
