The View with Rosie O'Donnell will be airing tomorrow with the first rescue workers/responders that arrived at 9/11. (ground zero)
They government lied to each and everyone of these people about their safety in order to remove the evidence.
25,000 people are sick, many have died and will continue to die.
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Let's see maybe it was peanut butter then? Give me a break University graduate, LOL.
see, its this type of pathetically ignorant response that gives your position nothing. i ask you for proof that it was steel, and you cant. you are pathetic.
why does molten metal = explosives you ing retard?
i dont know how many times i can ask you this? do you have ANY idea about constructing a valid argument? idiot.
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Controlled Demolitions Inc picked up the job to remove the evidence from ground zero. They shortly re-located outside the USA just like Halliburton has recently done, of course they have both made huge profits since 9/11. If they are doing so well in the US why have they left?
what does this have to do with ANYTHING? all i am asking you to do is provide some ing evidence of explosives. and you cant. youre just a moronic juvenile little turd that cant provide answers to very important, relevant questions. why? because your ideas are pathetically stupid. you and your ilk move in a million different ways at once, but try and pin you down on JUST ONE issue, and you go to pieces. pathetic.
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
You are the one who stands by that the fires where hot enough to cause the metal to weaken and cause the collapses. It is well known that these fires where not hot enough to melt the metal so something obviously did, the molten metal is on the record I will add again.
oh, it is "well known" is it? please provide me with real research tard. not your opinion. ive put together a bunch of logical questions for you to answer. but you dont have the intellectual commitment to providing them. pathetic.
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Can't have both ways know can we University Graduate. :rolleyes:
nice spelling & grammar there mate. with your complete lack of ability to attend to particular questions and arguments, you'll be lucky to be a highschool dropout.
so lets recap shall we?
the government, knowing that planes were going to hit the towers, pre-planted explosives in the buildings. a mammoth task that would have taken MONTHS.
somehow, they managed to get access to all the relevant structural steel to place their charges. but this wasn't enough for them.
they also placed tonnes and tonnes of a secret government agent, one that makes metal melt, and stay melted for weeks after the collapse. you know, just for the hell of it.
did i miss anything?
its funny seeing the typical CT response when asked serious questions. ignorant isnt even close to describing you.
keep fighting the power child! go read your conspiracy sites, ignore all the holes and respond with non sequitur statements when asked genuine questions. your commitment to finding the truth is truly impressive.
culorut
Your commitment to act like a non-University Graduate and an ass is really what the joke is here.
The point is molten metal=molten metal you idiot. IT WAS THERE. IT WAS IGNORED. IT WAS NOT TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION.
We are waiting on NIST for WTC7 six years later but since they already ignored many pieces of facts/evidence chances are they will have a report built upon these missing factors yet again.
There go the "official" reports you cling on to like a bible. Next time pick a subject a little less strenuous on your adolescent mind, you seem to get easily ruffled up when you are wrong.
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
The point is molten metal=molten metal you idiot. IT WAS THERE. IT WAS IGNORED. IT WAS NOT TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION.
There go the "official" reports you cling on to like a bible. Next time pick a subject a little less strenuous on your adolescent mind, you seem to get easily ruffled up when you are wrong.
and you havent provided a SINGLE reason why it should be taken into consideration. please, tell me. you cant even suggest an explosive you arseclown. this is your and the entire movement's problem. you cant put your claims into any type of proper context. im sure there are many things that were not included in the report. how about you ing show me why molten metal is OF ANY ING SIGNIFICANCE WHATSOEVER and deserved "consideration" you moron.
sorry, where is my reliance on "official" reports? most of my information does not come from any government source whatsoever. good try child.
still waiting for my answer re molten metal and explosives. keep up the cognitive dissonance. your parents must be proud. you have a long road of fast-food provision ahead of you.
Philby
lol this is a good thread. keep it up :)
shaolin_Z
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
why does molten metal = explosives you ing retard?
You have got to be kidding me PKSheep. A huge stirdy structure like that requires tons of explosives, and it's very common to detonate the charges at the bottom first so that the structure can fall down on it's footprint in a controlled demolition. Keeping in mind how over engineered the WTC was, it would require high power explosives in the base of the structure, which would also melt the steal. What's so hard to understand about that?
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
You have got to be kidding me PKSheep. A huge stirdy structure like that requires tons of explosives, and it's very common to detonate the charges at the bottom first so that the structure can fall down on it's footprint in a controlled demolition. Keeping in mind how over engineered the WTC was, it would require high power explosives in the base of the structure, which would also melt the steal. What's so hard to understand about that?
to quote rimmer from red dwarf "brimming over with wrongability" :p
explosives, the kind used in controlled demolitions DO NOT melt steel. they just dont work that way. they shatter steel or concrete. they dont melt anything. thermite DOES melt steel, but certainly wasn't used in the collapse, for multiple reasons i have listed a few pages back.
quote:
HMX or RDX on the other hand, which can be used in demolition (though TNT seems to be more common), would not melt steel, because the high energy content of the material is released in very short timescales, designed, not to melt the target, but to fracture it.
you guys can keep banging on about the explosives, but until you can present a suitable candidate, instead of the generic term "explosive" or the ridiculous "secret government explosive" you have a serious problem in your position.
i have read this explosive stuff til im bored to death of it. but i still havent been able to locate a suitable substance that fits in with what the CT argument states. feel free to provide me with one if you have one.
also shaolin, there has never been any demolition that explodes charges in the bottom to make a building fall from the top. ALL controlled demolition exercises collapse a building from the bottom up, NOT the top down. charges are set off from the bottom, sure, but then the building collapse starts at the very bottom.
nobody (including you) has EVER seen a building demolished by explosives fall down the way the WTC 1&2 did.
and LOL at "own footprint". yeah, if spewing debris hundreds of meters in all directions can be considered a footprint :p
shaolin_Z
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
to quote rimmer from red dwarf "brimming over with wrongability" :p
explosives, the kind used in controlled demolitions DO NOT melt steel. they just dont work that way. they shatter steel or concrete. they dont melt anything. thermite DOES melt steel, but certainly wasn't used in the collapse, for multiple reasons i have listed a few pages back.
Thermate does ;), and the traces for it were found in the what remaining steel from the columns wasn't illegally melted and shiped out immediately, along with sulphur, potassium and manganese.
EDIT=bold :p
_Ocean_Drive_
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
also shaolin, there has never been any demolition that explodes charges in the bottom to make a building fall from the top. ALL controlled demolition exercises collapse a building from the bottom up, NOT the top down. charges are set off from the bottom, sure, but then the building collapse starts at the very bottom.
nobody (including you) has EVER seen a building demolished by explosives fall down the way the WTC 1&2 did.
I like how you missed out WTC 7.
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
and LOL at "own footprint". yeah, if spewing debris hundreds of meters in all directions can be considered a footprint :p
Yes, because an OBVIOUS controlled explosion wouldn't be a dead-giveaway...
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Thermate does ;), and the traces for it were found in the what remaining steel from the columns wasn't illegally melted and shiped out immediately, along with sulphur, potassium and manganese.
EDIT=bold :p
but thats just not true shaolin :p also, thermate isn't used in demolitions.
quote:
Alex Jones, professional conspiracy theorist radio host, has said Jones found evidence of thermite. This isn't true. What Jones found was something which would have been in the debris pile anyway. Sulfur...
...
In Steven Jones' PDF "Answers to Objections and Questions", to support his claim for Sol-gels/Thermite he states:
"One molecule, described by the EPA's Erik Swartz, was present at levels "that dwarfed all others": 1,3-diphenylpropane. "We've never observed it in any sampling we've ever done,"
"At the beginning of October, the team visited the collapsed and damaged buildings at Ground Zero and over a period of six days collected a significant amount of data on building performance under extreme conditions." Source
"Team members toured what was left of the 16-acre World Trade Center plaza, interviewed officials and eyewitnesses, and examined remnants of fallen structures at the Staten Island landfill and at salvage yards. Steel samples were cut and catalogued for further study, and some were taken back to WPI for analysis (see the "deep mystery" of melted steel)". "The investigation consisted of visiting Ground Zero, a survey of the WTC site, land-fill and steel recycling centers, review of videotape records, eyewitness accounts, interviews with building design teams, and analysis using computer models."
(won't load for me currently, omg maybe its a conspiracy! :p )
quote:
Originally posted by _Ocean_Drive_
I like how you missed out WTC 7.
Yes, because an OBVIOUS controlled explosion wouldn't be a dead-giveaway...
^^ and here we have evidence of your typical conspiracy logic :rolleyes: WTC7, which did collapse more like a controlled demolition (bottom-up) is seen as evidence of government involvement, whereas the WTC1&2, which collapsed nothing like a demolition, was made to look like something other than a demolition, thus is evidence of a government plot. dont you just love how they think? :stongue:
culorut
quote:
but thats just not true shaolin also, thermate isn't used in demolitions.
Yes it is true and thermate was used in bringing down the towers.
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Yes it is true and thermate was used in bringing down the towers.
and where is your evidence young man? thermate isn't used in demolitions. and i would like to know how you believe any substance that can be ignited with heat withstood the fires that raged in the WTCs?
