return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 87)
View this Thread in Original format
shaolin_Z
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
given how ridiculously e the first edition of loose change was, i dont understand how you could possible fix it. you cant polish a turd!

Funny, I could have said something quite similar about popular mechanics BS analysis but I don't think there's a "version 2" of it so not entirely.
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Funny, I could have said something quite similar about popular mechanics BS analysis but I don't think there's a "version 2" of it so not entirely.


well, "screw loose change" was quite enough to "smackdown" loose change.
ogvh5150
quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Thanks, but I already have that. I'd rather do my own research than watch documentaries though, not that they don't have their place and provide some useful info.


It wasn't for you. It was for anyone lurking that might want to snatch a copy.

There are other videos out there all with their differences on what happened that day on 9/11.
shaolin_Z
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
well, "screw loose change" was quite enough to "smackdown" loose change.


LOL, if you insist.
SuspicionVandit
the dude from loose change told the guy from Popular Mechanics he was a liar!
When a man gets down to business like that, he speaks the truth!
shaolin_Z
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
i didnt bump it, crazy mofo m.johan (who should stick to beating his women or something) did.

I seriously doubt he's anything like the ignorant stereo type you're imposing on him. Maybe you should stick to using and ing as many women as you can and never commiting to a single one and leaving multiple women you impregnate to raise the children as single mothers...











Now, I only said that so you realize what an ass you are at times, very unecessarily too I might add, with a response that somewhat mirros yours.
M.Johan
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
a plane definitely didnt hit the pentagon!

yeah! go get 'em super sleuth!! :rolleyes:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
i didnt bump it, crazy mofo m.johan (who should stick to beating his women or something) did.

yeah, maybe im a little obsessed, but we all have our favourite topics (or anti-favourites) :p



FTW ..........:wtf: :wtf: :wtf: :conf:


i don't beat my woman u moTHERfuc@@@@@


This's ur ING US Department of Defence who released these videos

:rolleyes:

Not my words

WTF
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
I seriously doubt he's anything like the ignorant stereo type you're imposing on him. Maybe you should stick to using and ing as many women as you can and never commiting to a single one and leaving multiple women you impregnate to raise the children as single mothers...

Now, I only said that so you realize what an ass you are at times, very unecessarily too I might add, with a response that somewhat mirros yours.


honestly shaolin, youre such a baby at times! :p

oh, and last time i checked the bible didnt condone "Maybe you should stick to using and ing as many women as you can and never commiting to a single one and leaving multiple women you impregnate to raise the children as single mothers..." so your parallel doesn't work nearly as well. oh and women arent second-class citizens in australia like they are in much of the middle east. ner ni ner! :p
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
I seriously doubt he's anything like the ignorant stereo type you're imposing on him. Maybe you should stick to using and ing as many women as you can and never commiting to a single one and leaving multiple women you impregnate to raise the children as single mothers...

Now, I only said that so you realize what an ass you are at times, very unecessarily too I might add, with a response that somewhat mirros yours.


honestly shaolin, youre such a baby at times! :p

oh, and last time i checked the bible didnt condone "Maybe you should stick to using and ing as many women as you can and never commiting to a single one and leaving multiple women you impregnate to raise the children as single mothers..." so your parallel doesn't work nearly as well. oh and women arent second-class citizens in australia like they are in much of the middle east. ner ni ner! :p
shaolin_Z
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
honestly shaolin, youre such a baby at times! :p

oh, and last time i checked the bible didnt condone "Maybe you should stick to using and ing as many women as you can and never commiting to a single one and leaving multiple women you impregnate to raise the children as single mothers..." so your parallel doesn't work nearly as well. oh and women arent second-class citizens in australia like they are in much of the middle east. ner ni ner! :p

LOL, you're no Christian buddy! And it wasn't a reference to Christian values, the west has largely forgotton those. I know several christians, ones who're not hypocrites or crazy fundies, and you certainly aren't anything like them, and by that I mean, you don't have Chrisitan values. Anyways, didn't you despise religion and just about everything about it as you see it :p ?

pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
LOL, you're no Christian buddy! And it wasn't a reference to Christian values, the west has largely forgotton those. I know several christians, ones who're not hypocrites or crazy fundies, and you certainly aren't anything like them, and by that I mean, you don't have Chrisitan values. Anyways, didn't you despise religion and just about everything about it as you see it :p ?


yeah, pretty much ;)
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
After a clear smack down from Popular Mechanics and they're putting something else out??:wtf:

Capitalism at work! :haha: :crazy:


Popular Mechanics was ripped many times regarding their propaganda hit pieces.

Here is Mark Cuban handing Bill O'Reilly his ass and making it very clear that Popular mechanics is full of .


Mark Cuban Exposes O'Reilly Hypocrisy On Radio Broadcast


Hearst yellow journalism devotees Popular Mechanics, NY Post enlisted to debunk 9/11 truth again

Saturday, March 24, 2007


Billionaire Mark Cuban, the owner of the Dallas Mavericks who is set to finance a cinema release of Loose Change narrated by Charlie Sheen, exposed Bill O'Reilly's rampant hypocrisy concerning his coverage of the 9/11 truth movement on the Fox News host's radio show yesterday.

Offering the entire 18 minute segment will probably result in Bill calling on Fox security to pay us a visit so here's a 9 minute clip instead.

O'Reilly admits right off the bat that he has not even seen Loose Change, following in the trend of his fellow debunkers who have already arrived at a judgment without even checking the evidence. Bill's mind is made up! Don't bother him with the facts!

This painfully underscores exactly what this whole charade represents, not an open debate on the evidence, but a cynical attempt to smear Charlie Sheen, Rosie O'Donnell and Mark Cuban.

O'Reilly wastes no time in doing so by associating Loose Change with "Nazi propaganda."

O'Reilly's claim might hold more weight if Dylan Avery were in control of a powerful industrial country, ran its media and commanded its standing army, but last time I checked Dylan still lives in upstate New York with his friends and a dog called Justice.

"The security in the World Trade Center would have been impossible for anybody to have set charges," claims O'Reilly, oblivious to the fact that, as World Trade Center worker Scott Forbes, a senior database administrator for Fiduciary Trust, Inc. confirms, power downs and evacuation exercises in the towers were taking place on the weekend before 9/11, giving ample opportunity for incendiary devices to be placed. WTC workers Ben Fountain and William Rodriquez also confirmed this.

At this point Popular Mechanics editor-in-chief James Meigs chimes in to state that the impact of the jetliners and the fires they caused were enough to bring down the towers, a claim that is completely contradicted by the very design architects of the World Trade Center, who are all on the record as saying they designed the building to handle multiple impacts of large jetliners.

Meigs has an illustrious pedigree that puts him right up there with the professors and scholars that have studied 9/11 and the architects who designed the WTC - I just can't decide which title to give prominence, his position on the editorial staff of that bastion of scientific empiricism Entertainment Weekly or the equally respected Video Review.



Popular Mechanics is owned by Hearst Publishing. As fictionalized in Orson Welles' acclaimed film Citizen Kane, William Randolph Hearst (pictured) wrote the book on cronyism and yellow journalism and Popular Mechanics hasn't bucked that tradition.

Enter the term "yellow journalism" in the Encyclopedia Britannica and one of the first entries you will see is William Randolph Hearst. The listing attributes to Hearst a legacy of "distorted" and "lurid" reporting, and cites him as being hugely influential in fanning the flames of the Spanish-American war as a result of his newspaper's sensationalist yellow journalism.

Popular Mechanics is owned by the very corporation that defined yellow journalism!

During the interview, O'Reilly lauds Popular Mechanics as politically independent and non-partisan, "Popular Mechanics is not a political magazine, it's a technical magazine," when in fact it was darling of the Republican party John McCain who penned the foreword to Popular Mechanics' Debunking 9/11 Myths book.

In the foreword, McCain re-hashes an abhorrent amount of Neo-Con detritus that relies solely on 9/11 having happened exactly as the government claims it did. "We liberated Afghanistan from the murderous rule of the Taliban, our attackers' proud hosts. We chased Al Qaeda around the globe," barks the Arizona Senator.

Does this sound politically neutral to you?

Returning to the radio broadcast, O'Reilly brings on Mark Cuban, the billionaire owner of the Dallas Mavericks who plans to mass distribute Loose Change, and immediately makes an argument that Loose Change should be banned just as some books should be banned. Cuban points out that O'Reilly's insistence that "lunacy not be given legitimacy" by affording it any attention is contradicted by the very fact that O'Reilly is covering the controversy on his radio and TV show.

O'Reilly persists with his argument of "marginalizing cranks" which Cuban refutes by asking "how many shows have you spent on this topic?" O'Reilly claims he has only done one show on 9/11 conspiracies which is patently false. O'Reilly has attacked both Jim Fetzer and Kevin Barrett numerous times on his television show.

Cuban's appeal to freedom of speech and his involvement in putting out previous documentaries in association with the Republican party gives strong credence to his argument that people need to hear all sides of the argument, in contrast to O'Reilly's shrill demands for censorship of a film that he hasn't even bothered to watch.

O'Reilly then plays the obligatory Holocaust card to claim Loose Change is insulting to the victims, a myth that we have exposed a dozen times in the past. The representative of the largest 9/11 family victim's group, Bill Doyle who also lost his son in the attacks, is on the record as saying half of his members now have grave questions about what happened on 9/11.

"He's finished," barks O'Reilly, echoing the threat made on his TV show that narrating Loose Change will end Charlie Sheen's career, a baseless assumption considering Sheen's career has only achieved more prominence in the year since he went public on 9/11 to the Alex Jones Show.

Repeating his mafia-like warning of "I'm looking out for him (Sheen) and I'm looking out for you too," O'Reilly concludes the interview by urging Cuban to rethink the project, stating "there's a lot of pain involved in this kind of a situation." With rhetoric like this, O'Reilly wouldn't have looked out of place had he been born into the Genovese Cosa Nostra family.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 [87] 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 
Privacy Statement