return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 38)
View this Thread in Original format
pkcRAISTLIN
^^ and thats all you can do. cut n paste irrelevant stuff that means virtually nothing whilst ignoring the gaping holes in logic that ive already alluded to.
LazFX

I beleive that this guy did it, cause we all know the government is lying about Roswell too!! Release the Greys!!!!! :D
colonelcrisp
quote:
Originally posted by dcougar99
.




yeah guess your right... it was only 2 planes and some jet fuel :rolleyes:


In February 2005, The Windsor building in Madrid (pictured) burned for over 24 hours as shooting flames engulfed almost the entire structure and yet the building did not collapse. The core of the WTC was exponentially more robust than the Windsor building. So we have one building that burned incessantly for over 24 hours and did not fall, compared to two buildings which were structurally far superior, burned briefly from limited fires, and yet both collapsed within an average time of 79 minutes.




yup... still standing



well now that youve done your research....... how about not being a ing moron and compare apples to apples. windsor building is a REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURE USING A COLUMN AND TWO WAY SLAB DESIGN.... concrete is very very very resistant to fire dammage, the concrete insulates the steel reinforcement

the WTC towers were STEEL FRAME CONSTRUCTION. this means that you have an exterior "skeleton" made up of large steel girders and columns, from which you "hang" reinforced concrete slabs... the difference being that the steel is exposed in the WTC and the steel is the primary load carrier. in reinforced concrete, the steel carries none of the load, it merely acts as strain resistance... a quick lesson in strucutral concrete design

Concrete is stupidly strong in compression for a non homogenus cast in place material, however it can only withstand 0.0035 mm/mm of strain or elongation if you will, once it passes this mark, the concrete hits what is known as a modulus of rupture and explodes. the steel however will hold the concrete together, it provides tensile resistance to concrete and will allow the concrete to handle a much higher load in both compression and tension (flexture) than non reinforced concrete.
colonelcrisp
quote:
Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Hmm... 1945, a B-25 bomber crashed into the Empire State building and expolded. Forteen people died and the builiding never came down.

http://history1900s.about.com/od/19...empirecrash.htm

EDIT: Here's another link: http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92525&page=1


while the empire state building is tall, its not that tall. the higher up you go, the more the building is affected by things like fire... lets put it this way, at the top of the WTC towers the wind blowing into the buring building turns it into the environment similar to that of an oxygen blast furnace.. drastically increasing the heat.

as for the "traces of thermate found" the only traces you are going to find is the acelrants added to the the thermite mixture, and lets face it, they arent exactly rare elements to find especially around rubble from steel and concrete.

the thermite theory is total bull, no amateur video footage or crack pot physist can prove otherwise. the sheer volume required is just incomprehensible.

and for the record those thermite grenades you were speaking of, the military uses them to disable field artilery, the most dammage they can muster is welding the breach shut, not melting through it, that would require too much thermite.
pkcRAISTLIN
colonel crisp, you are a ing champion :)
colonelcrisp
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
colonel crisp, you are a ing champion :)


sorry i just cant help myself when i read all the factless dribble that perversly pours onto the keyboards of these conspiracy theorists. im not an expert, but 6 years of structural engineering education and workterms does keep me on top of my game :D
LazFX
quote:
Originally posted by colonelcrisp
sorry i just cant help myself when i read all the factless dribble that perversly pours onto the keyboards of these conspiracy theorists. im not an expert, but 6 years of structural engineering education and workterms does keep me on top of my game :D


You mean to tell me that my 4 years of university, my hatred of all things America, my paid subscriptions to infowars.com, my inability to accept the fact that a bunch of radicals hijacked planes, the fact that I have only lived on this earth less than the towers stood, the fact that I have lived off of my parents money for the past 20 years and the ability to quote Chumpsky does not make me an expert on structural engineering??:eek: Damn it... well I guess I still have the Roswell thing going for me..




ha ha ha ha

crisp is da man
colonelcrisp
quote:
Originally posted by LazFX
You mean to tell me that my 4 years of university, my hatred of all things America, my paid subscriptions to infowars.com, my inability to accept the fact that a bunch of radicals hijacked planes, the fact that I have only lived on this earth less than the towers stood, the fact that I have lived off of my parents money for the past 20 years and the ability to quote Chumpsky does not make me an expert on structural engineering??:eek: Damn it... well I guess I still have the Roswell thing going for me..




ha ha ha ha

crisp is da man



in the words of the ragin cajun.... i have nothing to say..... that was well, perfect....
LazFX

As in his belief of a 9/11 cover up, the Baker ignores the obvious.
donnybrasco
OMG. This thread was never locked or died?

Scary. :nervous:

colonelcrisp
quote:
Originally posted by donnybrasco
OMG. This thread was never locked or died?

Scary. :nervous:


NB4DALOCK ??
shaolin_Z
quote:
Originally posted by colonelcrisp
while the empire state building is tall, its not that tall. the higher up you go, the more the building is affected by things like fire... lets put it this way, at the top of the WTC towers the wind blowing into the buring building turns it into the environment similar to that of an oxygen blast furnace.. drastically increasing the heat.


That's a nice little theory. Unfortunately, a simple statement backed up by no evidence won't make me beleive it. And don't bother trying to find a similar example. The closest one's I can think of, was a) the B25 bomber crashing into the Empire State Building, and b) the building in Madrid that burned for over a week (or something close to that). In both cases, the structural integrity of the building were not compromised and the didn't collapse, especially in a manner that looks exactly like a controlled demolition. The tower's came down at nearly freefall speed. And the obvious implication of that is the extremely low probability (more like impossiblity) of the pancake theory.

quote:
Originally posted by colonelcrisp
as for the "traces of thermate found" the only traces you are going to find is the acelrants added to the the thermite mixture, and lets face it, they arent exactly rare elements to find especially around rubble from steel and concrete.


Yeah, it's not exactly a rare substance to find in the rubble of a controlled demolition. You care to elaborate on other probable causes as to why it would be present in samples of the support beams for the WTC? Plus the yellow hot molten steel goes hand in hand with a thermite reaction.

quote:
Originally posted by colonelcrisp
the thermite theory is total bull, no amateur video footage or crack pot physist can prove otherwise.


Now that a very compelling argument. Thermite with accelerants (like sulphut if I recall correcrlty?) are more than capable of melting through steel. Apparently you haven't read through the rest of this thread. Ogvh5150 posted a video from google video (or utube) which explains in simple terms and demonstrates how thermate easily cuts through steel. I find it hard to believe that you're actually debating that thermate can't cut through structural steel.

quote:
Originally posted by colonelcrisp
the sheer volume required is just incomprehensible.


Uh-huh, something that the military industrial complex and Intelligence agencies are incapable of right?

EDIT: 2 more things you might want to look into (or gloss over?):

1) The evidence was ILLEGALY removed (majroity of the steel melted and sold to China)

2) The architect and engineers of the WTC specifically designed and over engineered the structural integrity of the Twin Towers to be able to withstand multiple airline hits from a 707.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 
Privacy Statement