return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 [225] 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 
Do you believe there is a U.S. government cover-up surrounding 9/11? (pg. 225)
View this Thread in Original format
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Guess what they still lost and are still bitchy whiny losers.


so, what exactly has the truth movement "won" in your time championing the cause? since we're losers you must be the winners, so what has been achieved champ?
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
so, what exactly has the truth movement "won" in your time championing the cause? since we're losers you must be the winners, so what has been achieved champ?



You see this post like practically all of the others you have made sums you up quite nicely.

There is nothing to win, especially in a discussion forum which mainly is focused primarily on music. You decided to engage in a topic posted and began trashing people specifically not a "truth movement", including whether or not they were present on this forum.


You have not backed up anything aside from posting what most who have read up on 9/11 already know. Muttering insults into cyberspace does not make you an expert on the matter either. If you feel it does get your head checked immediately, insults, rumors and mis-information posted from shady websites are not facts.

If anything has been achieved it is that ignorance has been shown here to it's full potential and it continues to be the downfall of the human race.
Krypton
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Well show me a poll that shows otherwise, every last one I have seen has not sided with the official story what so ever.


Well, looking polls from internet forums does NOTHING to help your argument. It makes you look ridiculous.

From Scripps Howard...

quote:
"Federal officials either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or took no action to stop them".

* 59% "not likely"
* 20% "somewhat likely"
* 16% "very likely"

"The collapse of the twin towers in New York was aided by explosives secretly planted in the two buildings".

* 77% "unlikely"
* 10% "somewhat likely"
* 6% "very likely"

"The Pentagon was struck by a military cruise missile in 2001 rather than by an airliner captured by terrorists".

* 80% "not likely"
* 6% "somewhat likely"
* 6% "very likely"

How about that some people in the federal government had specific warnings of the 9/11 attacks in New York and Washington, but chose to ignore those warnings. Is this very likely, somewhat likely or unlikely?

* 32% "Very Likely"
* 30% "Somewhat Likely
* 30% "Unlikely"
* 8% "Don't Know/Other"
pkcRAISTLIN
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
You see this post like practically all of the others you have made sums you up quite nicely.

There is nothing to win, especially in a discussion forum which mainly is focused primarily on music. You decided to engage in a topic posted and began trashing people specifically not a "truth movement", including whether or not they were present on this forum.


You have not backed up anything aside from posting what most who have read up on 9/11 already know. Muttering insults into cyberspace does not make you an expert on the matter either. If you feel it does get your head checked immediately, insults, rumors and mis-information posted from shady websites are not facts.

If anything has been achieved it is that ignorance has been shown here to it's full potential and it continues to be the downfall of the human race.


in other words, not a damned thing. 7 years of "researching" and the movement has got nothing to show for it. how humiliating :haha:
LazFX
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
in other words, not a damned thing. 7 years of "researching" and the movement has got nothing to show for it. how humiliating :haha:

If this was a "grant" funded study, the funds would of already been pulled.
culorut
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
in other words, not a damned thing. 7 years of "researching" and the movement has got nothing to show for it. how humiliating :haha:


How pathetic and fuking naive.

Forcing countless documents to be released to the public via the Freedom of Information Act, supporting and raising funds for the 9/11 responders and pushing for impeachment against a criminal government is just a fraction.

I would say you have your head deep in a sand pit troll.

Here is a perfect example although I have a serious problem with them trying to justify spending money on heroes. Then again the NY Post is owned by the same jerk off who owns Fox News so it really is no surprise.


9/11 AID MAY $ICK IT TO US


Federal legislation to help those suffering health problems from the World Trade Center terrorist attacks could cost taxpayers up to $13 billion, The Post has learned.

The bill, which will go before a House hearing today and is strongly backed by Mayor Bloomberg, would reopen the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund and would provide funding for medical care for downtown residents and for firefighters, cops, EMTs and construction workers who worked at Ground Zero.

The preliminary estimate of the cost of the measure by the Congressional Budget Office ranged from $8 billion to $13 billion, congressional sources said.

The staggering cost figure hasn't been publicly disclosed yet but was revealed to The Post by sources.

Under the bill, roughly 35,000 people living within 1.5 miles of Ground Zero would be eligible for medical benefits at a projected cost of $3.1 billion. Thousands of first-responders would also receive medical aid at a cost of $2 billion.

As many as 85,000 first-responders could be eligible for medical aid. But the overall cost for their care is less than for residents because most of the first-responders have health insurance that covers a large share of their medical bills, sources said.

The price for reopening the victims' fund was harder to calculate because congressional analysts couldn't predict how many people would apply. They put the cost at anywhere from $3 billion to $8 billion, sources said.

The legislation has the active support of Bloomberg, who last month met with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to push for its passage.

If approved, the bill would spare the city from massive liability by letting sick workers, or families of those who died, apply for aid from a reopened and federally financed Victim Compensation Fund.

After the terror attacks, the federal fund paid out $6 billion to families of those who died on 9/11 and another $1 billion to the injured through 2003.

The current bill is far less costly than an earlier version that was estimated at $30 billion.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/0731200...o_us_122366.htm
culorut
Nothing accomplished? :eyespop:

NTSB: No Records Pertaining To Process Of Positive Identification Of 9/11 Aircraft Wreckage


Within a July 18, 2008 Freedom of Information Act response from the National Transportation Safety Board, the NTSB indicates that it possesses no records indicating how wreckage recovered from the 4 aircraft used during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 was positively identified as belonging to the 4 planes reportedly hijacked that day or even if such wreckage was positively identified at all.




Within a similar March 18, 2008 FOIA response from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the FBI states the following:

"The identity of the three hijacked aircraft has never been in question by the FBI, NTSB or FAA"

http://www.infowars.com/?p=886&cp=1

However, NTSB factual reports pertaining to the Flight Data Recorders allegedly belonging to American Airlines flight 77 (N644AA) and United Airlines flight 93 (N591UA), do not cite a "Flight Data Recorder Group", that would normally consist of Federal Aviation Administration and airline officials, in possession of records pertaining to a given aircraft and unique serial numbers pertaining to each FDR. The absence of published FDR part and serial numbers within each NTSB FDR report suggests that the NTSB were not provided access to such records that would allow them to confirm the identities of the FDRs studied by them.

Many FDRs possess unique memory configurations that are identified by serial numbers contained within a given aircraft's records. Such serial numbers are required to facilitate FDR data readouts. Presumably, if the recovered AA 77 and UA 93 FDR's did not possess the memory configurations indicated within FAA and airline aircraft records, a mismatch could become apparent to NTSB investigators.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/16089

The FDRs in question were apparently recovered by NTSB personnel.

Carol Carmody, Vice-Chairman, National Transportation Safety Board, referring to the NTSB:

"I ... assured FBI Director Mueller that we would assist in any way we could ... he called and said, "Could you send us some people to help find the black boxes and help identify aircraft parts."

http://www.ntsb.gov/speeches/carmody/cc020227.htm

Marion Blakey, Chairman, National Transportation Safety Board, referring to the NTSB:

"Over 60 Safety Board employees worked around the clock in Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, and at our headquarters in Washington, D. C., assisting with aircraft parts identification"

http://www.ntsb.gov/Speeches/blakey/mcb020625.htm

The text of the July 11, 2008 NTSB FOIA request:

"I respectfully request copies of records revealing the process by which wreckage recovered from the aircraft used during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, was positively identified as belonging to: American Airlines flight 11 (N334AA), United Airlines flight 175 (N612UA), American Airlines flight 77 (N644AA) and United Airlines flight 93 (N591UA).

The afore mentioned aircraft are identified within numerous public NTSB records. Positive wreckage identification was presumably obtained through the use of unique serial number identifying information contained by the said aircraft's wreckage. Within U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 14, Part 45, it is indicated that all U.S. commercial civil aircraft are required to contain numerous components bearing unique serial number data "secured in such a manner that it will not likely be ... lost or destroyed in an accident"."
culorut
Nothing accomplished? :eyespop:


National Security Whistleblower J. Michael Springmann


This week Visibility 9-11 welcomes former diplomat from the State Department's Foreign Service J. Michael Springmann. Mr. Springmann served postings in Germany, India, Saudi Arabia, and the Bureau of Intelligence and Research in Washington D.C. He is a published author of several articles on national security themes, and is an attorney in private practice in Washington D.C.

Michael has attended several 9/11 Conferences over the years, most notably, the 9/11 Omission hearings on 9/9/2004 chaired by former Representative and current Green Party candidate for President, Cynthia McKinney, as well as the recent conference in Keene, NH.

Included in this important interview is a discussion regarding a new article by Mr. Springmann titled, THE MISTAKE DEPARTMENT: One Example of Why American Foreign Policy is a Disaster that discusses the American Consulate General at Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and it's relationship to 15 of the 19 alleged September 11th hijackers. In it, he says that "the Jeddah Consulate was not a State Department post but an intelligence services operation", "the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) routinely demanded (and got) visas for sleazy characters with no ties to either their home country or Saudi Arabia," and "these vile people were terrorists recruited by U.S. intelligence officers along with Osama bin Laden, then a CIA asset."
pkcRAISTLIN
wow. i take it all back. you've managed to file some FOI requests :stongue:

what an outstanding accomplishment.
colonelcrisp
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
You and colonel sound like 8 year olds, downplaying and making personal attacks on people on the internet (very original).

It has been like what a billion pages now in this thread and with every letter you two type you are discrediting your cause and making yourselves look like a-holes.

You remind me of when I played road hockey as child and the kids we gave a beating to would bitch and whine all the way home with every excuse in the world.

Guess what they still lost and are still bitchy whiny losers.



thats what the internet is for dumbass, its a forum for me to make baseless (well not so much in your case) ill intended statements about other peoples intelligence / sexual orientation / mothers etc etc without fear of reprisal.


so i have said it before and now i say it again.....



YOUR A DOUCHE AND AN IDIOT

culorut
And you are the most retarded engineer (supposedly) I have ever encountered. It has been at least 50 pages and you still cannot back up one dam thing you have polluted this forum with.

Bravo. You and PKC should get married.
Krypton
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
And you are the most retarded engineer (supposedly) I have ever encountered. It has been at least 50 pages and you still cannot back up one dam thing you have polluted this forum with.

Bravo. You and PKC should get married.


Do you have a thesis published in a scientifically peer-reviewed journal which implicates complicity of government involvement in the 9/11 attacks? I'de really like to see it.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 [225] 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 
Privacy Statement